Common use of Video recordings Clause in Contracts

Video recordings. A. The State and CCPOA agree that reviewing/viewing of live or recorded video will not be used for routine supervision of staff. Audio/video surveillance will not be used to monitor staff arrivals/departures from the job site. However, if during the legitimate review of audio/video, staff misconduct is identified, the audio/video recording can be used as part of the corrective action and/or disciplinary process. If CCPOA is concerned that inappropriate reviewing/viewing is occurring, CCPOA may raise the specifics of this concern to the Warden. If dissatisfied with the local response, CCPOA may submit its specific concerns in writing to the Associate Director for their determination if inappropriate reviewing/viewing has occurred. B. Routine Matters For routine matters, that do not involve an allegation of misconduct or an investigation by the Office of Internal Affairs, the State agrees that Unit 6 employees may be granted an opportunity to review CDCR video recording(s) of an incident they were involved in only AFTER writing and submitting their report. After reviewing such CDCR video recording(s), the Unit 6 employees will be given the opportunity to write a supplemental report prior to the end of their shift. C. Misconduct, Administrative, Criminal & DFIT Investigations 1. Unit 6 employees will be allowed to review the video, unless, at any point, a CDCR video relates to an incident involving allegations of misconduct (defined as situations where the Hiring Authority has determined and initiated the CDCR Form 989 process), or administrative action is contemplated, in which case Unit 6 employees shall only be granted an opportunity to review CDCR video recording(s) at the sole discretion of the Warden, Chief Deputy Warden or above. If the Xxxx 0 employee is denied the opportunity to review any video indicated in 1. above, no further questions/clarifications may be requested of the Unit 6 employee by the Hiring Authority. 2. Unit 6 employees will be allowed to review the video, unless, at any point, a CDCR video relates to an incident where criminal or Deadly Force Investigation is contemplated. Unit 6 employees shall only be granted an opportunity to review CDCR video recording(s) at the sole discretion of the Office of Internal Affairs/investigating or prosecuting agency. If the Unit 6 employee is denied the opportunity to review any video indicated in 2. above, no further questions/clarifications may be requested of the Unit 6 employee by the Hiring Authority.

Video recordings. A. The State and CCPOA agree that reviewing/viewing of live or recorded video will not be used for routine supervision of staff. Audio/video surveillance will not be used to monitor staff arrivals/departures from the job site. However, if during the legitimate review of audio/video, staff misconduct is identified, the audio/audio/ video recording can be used as part of the corrective action and/or disciplinary process. If CCPOA is concerned that inappropriate reviewing/viewing is occurring, CCPOA may raise the specifics of this concern to the Warden. If dissatisfied with the local response, CCPOA may submit its specific concerns in writing to the Associate Director for their determination if inappropriate reviewing/viewing has occurred. B. Routine Matters For routine matters, that do not involve an allegation of misconduct or an investigation by the Office of Internal Affairs, the State agrees that Unit 6 employees may be granted an opportunity to review CDCR video recording(s) of an incident they were involved in only AFTER writing and submitting their report. After reviewing such CDCR video recording(s), the Unit 6 employees will be given the opportunity to write a supplemental report prior to the end of their shift. C. Misconduct, Administrative, Criminal & DFIT Investigations 1. Unit 6 employees will be allowed to review the video, unless, at any point, a CDCR video relates to an incident involving allegations of misconduct (defined as situations where the Hiring Authority has determined and initiated the CDCR Form 989 process), or administrative action is contemplated, in which case Unit 6 employees shall only be granted an opportunity to review CDCR video recording(s) at the sole discretion of the Warden, Chief Deputy Warden or above. If the Xxxx 0 employee is denied the opportunity to review any video indicated in 1. above, no further questions/clarifications may be requested of the Unit 6 employee by the Hiring Authority. 2. Unit 6 employees will be allowed to review the video, unless, at any point, a CDCR video relates to an incident where criminal or Deadly Force Investigation is contemplated. Unit 6 employees shall only be granted an opportunity to review CDCR video recording(s) at the sole discretion of the Office of Internal Affairs/investigating or prosecuting agency. If the Unit 6 employee is denied the opportunity to review any video indicated in 2. above, no further questions/clarifications may be requested of the Unit 6 employee by the Hiring Authority.

Video recordings. A. The State and CCPOA agree that reviewing/viewing of live or recorded video will not be used for routine supervision of staff. Audio/video surveillance will not be used to monitor staff arrivals/departures from the job site. However, if during the legitimate review of audio/video, staff misconduct is identified, the audio/audio/ video recording can be used as part of the corrective action and/or disciplinary process. If CCPOA is concerned that inappropriate reviewing/viewing is occurring, CCPOA may raise the specifics of this concern to the Warden. If dissatisfied with the local response, CCPOA may submit its specific concerns in writing to the Associate Director for their his/her determination if inappropriate reviewing/viewing has occurred. B. Routine Matters For routine matters, that do not involve an allegation of misconduct or an investigation by the Office of Internal Affairs, the State agrees that Unit 6 employees may be granted an opportunity to review CDCR video recording(s) of an incident they were involved in only AFTER writing and submitting their report. After reviewing such CDCR video recording(s), the Unit 6 employees will be given the opportunity to write a supplemental report prior to the end of their shift. C. Misconduct, Administrative, Criminal & DFIT Investigations 1. Unit 6 employees will be allowed to review the video, unless, at any point, a CDCR video relates to an incident involving allegations of misconduct (defined as situations where the Hiring Authority has determined and initiated the CDCR Form 989 process), or administrative action is contemplated, in which case Unit 6 employees shall only be granted an opportunity to review CDCR video recording(s) at the sole discretion of the Warden, Chief Deputy Warden or above. If the Xxxx 0 employee is denied the opportunity to review any video indicated in 1. above, no further questions/clarifications may be requested of the Unit 6 employee by the Hiring Authority. 2. Unit 6 employees will be allowed to review the video, unless, at any point, a CDCR video relates to an incident where criminal or Deadly Force Investigation is contemplated. Unit 6 employees shall only be granted an opportunity to review CDCR video recording(s) at the sole discretion of the Office of Internal Affairs/investigating or prosecuting agency. If the Unit 6 employee is denied the opportunity to review any video indicated in 2. above, no further questions/clarifications may be requested of the Unit 6 employee by the Hiring Authority.

Video recordings. A. The State and CCPOA agree that reviewing/viewing of live or recorded video will not be used for routine supervision of staff. Audio/video surveillance will not be used to monitor staff arrivals/departures from the job site. However, if during the legitimate review of audio/video, staff misconduct is identified, the audio/audio/ video recording can be used as part of the corrective action and/or disciplinary process. If CCPOA is concerned that inappropriate reviewing/viewing is occurring, CCPOA may raise the specifics of this concern to the Warden. If dissatisfied with the local response, CCPOA may submit its specific concerns in writing to the Associate Director for his/her their determination if inappropriate reviewing/viewing has occurred. B. Routine Matters For routine matters, that do not involve an allegation of misconduct or an investigation by the Office of Internal Affairs, the State agrees that Unit 6 employees may be granted an opportunity to review CDCR video recording(s) of an incident they were involved in only AFTER writing and submitting their report. After reviewing such CDCR video recording(s), the Unit 6 employees will be given the opportunity to write a supplemental report prior to the end of their shift. C. Misconduct, Administrative, Criminal & DFIT Investigations 1. Unit 6 employees will be allowed to review the video, unless, at any point, a CDCR video relates to an incident involving allegations of misconduct (defined as situations where the Hiring Authority has determined and initiated the CDCR Form 989 process), or administrative action is contemplated, in which case Unit 6 employees shall only be granted an opportunity to review CDCR video recording(s) at the sole discretion of the Warden, Chief Deputy Warden or above. If the Xxxx 0 employee is denied the opportunity to review any video indicated in 1. above, no further questions/clarifications may be requested of the Unit 6 employee by the Hiring Authority. 2. Unit 6 employees will be allowed to review the video, unless, at any point, a CDCR video relates to an incident where criminal or Deadly Force Investigation is contemplated. Unit 6 employees shall only be granted an opportunity to review CDCR video recording(s) at the sole discretion of the Office of Internal Affairs/investigating or prosecuting agency. If the Unit 6 employee is denied the opportunity to review any video indicated in 2. above, no further questions/clarifications may be requested of the Unit 6 employee by the Hiring Authority.