WHOLE STUDENT POPULATION Sample Clauses

WHOLE STUDENT POPULATION. Access Canterbury Xxxxxx Church University is proud of its record in attracting students from under-represented groups. In 2014/15 97.8% of young, full-time Undergraduate entrants came from state schools or colleges. Achievement in this area can be evidenced by evaluating HESA performance indicators against benchmark. The following figures are based on the most recent HESA Performance indicators (2014/15) for the student population at CCCU: Performance indicator Location adjusted benchmark Young, full-time undergraduate entrants from lower socio economic groups NS SEC 4-7 39.8% 36.7% (+3.1%) Young Full time Undergraduate entrants from Low Participation Neighbourhoods (LPN) 13.7% 10.8% (+2.9) Young, full time Undergraduate entrants from state schools 97.8% 95.1% (2.7%) BME Student population 18.3% N/A Students with a declared disability as a percentage of the total population 12.6% N/A We analyse our HESA data to determine additional areas of investment. This analysis highlights the need for continuing attention to be given to the targeted recruitment of students from low participating neighbourhoods, particularly of ‘other full-time undergraduates’. A concern for the institution is the recruitment of m a l e students into the professions of Teaching and Health, as well as improving the representation of mature and part-time students. Our Access Agreement Monitoring Return for 2014-15 indicated some very encouraging progress made year on year, in increasing participation from BME students and students with a disability. 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Proportion of BME students 13.9% 14.2% 15.5% 16.2% 18.3% Proportion of students with a disability 10.2% 10.5% 11% 11.4% 12.6% Success The following table shows the most recent performance data from four student groups: 2014/15 HESA data XXX X0-0 BME Disability NS-SEC 4-7 Percentage of students from the following groups obtaining a good degree (2:1 or above) vs. comparator group (in brackets) 63.6% (68.4%) 46.5% (71.0%) 62.7% (67.4%) 66% (70%) Non-continuation rates: non-continuation rate has been calculated as the number of students withdrawing in the PC Grouping divided by the total number of registrations for that PC grouping. The comparable percentage of the non-PC grouping is given in brackets. 6.3% (6.3%) 8.5% (5.8%) 6.5% (6.3%) 6.6% (5.9%)
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to WHOLE STUDENT POPULATION

  • Target Population The Grantee shall ensure that diversion programs and services provided under this grant are designed to serve juvenile offenders who are at risk of commitment to Department.

  • Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).

  • Population The Population shall be defined as all Paid Claims during the 12-month period covered by the Claims Review.

  • Loop Provisioning Involving Integrated Digital Loop Carriers 2.6.1 Where InterGlobe has requested an Unbundled Loop and BellSouth uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the End User and BellSouth has a suitable alternate facility available, BellSouth will make such alternative facilities available to InterGlobe. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, BellSouth will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for InterGlobe (e.g. hairpinning):

  • Local Switching Interfaces 4.2.13.1 Newcomm shall order ports and associated interfaces compatible with the services it wishes to provide as listed in Exhibit A. BellSouth shall provide the following local switching interfaces:

  • Infrastructure Vulnerability Scanning Supplier will scan its internal environments (e.g., servers, network devices, etc.) related to Deliverables monthly and external environments related to Deliverables weekly. Supplier will have a defined process to address any findings but will ensure that any high-risk vulnerabilities are addressed within 30 days.

  • Required Coverages For Generation Resources Of 20 Megawatts Or Less Each Constructing Entity shall maintain the types of insurance as described in section 11.1 paragraphs (a) through (e) above in an amount sufficient to insure against all reasonably foreseeable direct liabilities given the size and nature of the generating equipment being interconnected, the interconnection itself, and the characteristics of the system to which the interconnection is made. Additional insurance may be required by the Interconnection Customer, as a function of owning and operating a Generating Facility. All insurance shall be procured from insurance companies rated “A-,” VII or better by AM Best and authorized to do business in a state or states in which the Interconnection Facilities are located. Failure to maintain required insurance shall be a Breach of the Interconnection Construction Service Agreement.

  • Substance Abuse Testing The Parties agree that it is in the best interest of all concerned to promote a safe working environment. The Union has no objection to pre-employment substance abuse testing when required by the Employer and further, the Union has no objection to voluntary substance abuse testing to qualify for employment on projects when required by a project owner. The cost and scheduling of such testing shall be paid for and arranged by the Employer. The Union agrees to reimburse the Employer for any failed pre-access Alcohol and Drug test costs.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • POPULATION SERVED Adults – Male and Female

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.