Workload Review Panel Sample Clauses

Workload Review Panel. 12.11.1 Any Member dissatisfied with a finalized workload may file a written Notice of Review with the Xxxx and send a copy to the President of the Association. The Member will file a Notice of Review within five (5) working days of receipt of their finalized workload. 12.11.2 Each Workload Review Panel will be composed of at least the following or their named alternates: 12.11.2.1 The Xxxx who will act as non-voting Chair; 12.11.2.2 The Chair or the individual responsible for the preliminary workload assigned to the affected Member; and
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Workload Review Panel. 12.11.1 Any Member dissatisfied with her/his finalized workload may file a written Notice of Review with the Xxxx and send a copy to the President of the Association. The Member will file a Notice of Review within five working days of receipt of their finalized workload. 12.11.2 Each Workload Review Panel will be composed of at least the following or their named alternatives: 12.11.2.1 the Xxxx who will act as non-voting Chair; 12.11.2.2 the Chair or the individual responsible for the preliminary workload assigned to the affected Member. 12.11.2.3 three Academic or Resource area Members. (a) The Members will pre-select seven Members from the appropriate employment category. The Xxxx will ensure a democratic process of pre-selection occurs by the end of January each year. (b) When a request for review is filed, the Xxxx will canvas the seven pre-selected Members, of whom three will serve on the panel. 12.11.3 In making its determinations on the merits of the appeal, the Workload Review Panel will review the workload procedures in the appropriate employment category to determine if all the workload assignment procedures have been considered and applied. The Workload Review Panel Members and the Member requesting the review may request the Xxxx to provide access to the assigned workloads and workload criteria considerations for the appropriate and relevant Members in the Academic Unit. 12.11.4 Within 15 working days of the date of the Member’s review request, the Workload Review Panel will make a recommendation to the Xxxx on whether a workload adjustment is warranted. 12.11.5 The Xxxx will, without delay, refer the recommendation of the Workload Review Panel, including dissenting comments, to the Executive Officer whose decision will be final. 12.11.6 The Executive Officer will communicate the final decision in writing to the Member within ten working days of receipt of the recommendation. If the appeal is denied, the Executive Officer will provide a written explanation. A copy of the decision will be forwarded to the Association. 12.11.7 The financial management for successful appeals will be the responsibility of the Xxxx of the Faculty or School.
Sample 1

Related to Workload Review Panel

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Claims and Review Procedure In the event that any claim for benefits that must initially be submitted in writing to the Board of Directors, is denied (in whole or in part) hereunder, the claimant shall receive from First Charter a notice of denial in writing within 60 days, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for denial, with specific reference to pertinent provisions of this Supplemental Agreement. Any disagreements about such interpretations and construction shall be submitted to an arbitrator subject to the rules and procedures established by the American Arbitration Association. The arbitrator shall be acceptable to both First Charter and the Executive (or Beneficiary); if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator, the disagreement shall be heard by a panel of three arbitrators, with each party to appoint one arbitrator and the third to be chosen by the other two. No member of the Board of Directors shall be liable to any person for any action taken under Article VIII except those actions undertaken with lack of good faith.

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.

  • Claims Review The IRO shall perform the Claims Review annually to cover each of the five Reporting Periods. The IRO shall perform all components of each Claims Review.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!