Written Notice of the IRO’s Final External Review Decision Sample Clauses

Written Notice of the IRO’s Final External Review Decision. Within 48 hours after the date of receiving the opinion of each Clinical Peer, the IRO shall make a decision based upon the recommendations of a majority of the Clinical Peers conducting the review and will provide oral or written notice of the decision to the Member or the Member’s authorized representative and to The Plan. If the IRO’s notice is provided orally, the IRO will provide written confirmation of the decision within 48 hours of the initial oral notice. The IRO will include in its written notice: a. A general description of the reason for the request for external review; b. The written opinion of each Clinical Peer, including the opinion of each Clinical Peer as to whether the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered and the rationale for the reviewer's recommendation; c. The date on which the IRO was assigned to conduct the external review; d. The date of the IRO's decision; and e. The principal rationale for the IRO’s decision.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Written Notice of the IRO’s Final External Review Decision. Within 20 days after the date of receiving the opinion of each Clinical Peer, the IRO shall make a decision and provide written notice of the decision to the Member or the Member’s authorized representative and to The Plan. If a majority of the Clinical Peers respond that the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered, the IRO shall make a decision to reverse The Plan's adverse benefit determination or final internal adverse benefit determination. If a majority of the Clinical Peers respond that the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should not be covered, the IRO shall make a decision to uphold The Plan's adverse benefit determination or final internal adverse benefit determination. If the Clinical Peers are evenly split as to whether the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered, the IRO shall obtain the opinion of an additional Clinical Peer. The additional Clinical Peer shall use the same information to reach an opinion as used by the Clinical Peers who have already submitted their opinions. The selection of the additional Clinical may not extend the time within which the assigned IRO is required to make a decision based on the opinions of the Clinical Peers. The IRO will include in its written notice: a. A general description of the reason for the request for external review; b. The written opinion of each Clinical Peer, including the opinion of each Clinical Peer as to whether the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered and the rationale for the reviewer's recommendation; c. The date on which the IRO was assigned to conduct the external review; d. The date of the IRO's decision; and e. The principal rationale for the IRO’s decision.
Written Notice of the IRO’s Final External Review Decision. The IRO will send written notification of its decision to the Member and to The Plan within 45 days after the IRO’s receipt of the request for external review. The notice will include: a. A general description of the reason for the external review request, including information sufficient to identify the claim, and the reason for the prior denial; b. The date the IRO received the assignment to conduct the external review and the date of the IRO’s decision; c. References to the evidence or documentation considered in reaching the decision, including specific coverage provisions and Evidence-Based Standards; d. A discussion of the principal reason(s) for the IRO’s decision, including the rationale for its decision and any Evidence-Based Standards relied on in making the decision; e. A statement that the IRO’s determination is binding, unless other remedies are available to The Plan or the Member under state or federal law; f. A statement that judicial review may be available to the Member and The Plan; and g. Contact information for a consumer appeal assistance program at the Commissioner of Securities and Insurance. 18

Related to Written Notice of the IRO’s Final External Review Decision

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Reasonable Suspicion Testing All Employees Performing Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Reasonable suspicion testing for alcohol or controlled substances may be directed by the Employer for any employee performing safety-sensitive functions when there is reason to suspect that alcohol or controlled substance use may be adversely affecting the employee’s job performance or that the employee may present a danger to the physical safety of the employee or another. B. Specific objective grounds must be stated in writing that support the reasonable suspicion. Examples of specific objective grounds include but are not limited to: 1. Physical symptoms consistent with alcohol and/or controlled substance use; 2. Evidence or observation of alcohol or controlled substance use, possession, sale, or delivery; or 3. The occurrence of an accident(s) where a trained manager, supervisor or lead worker suspects alcohol or other controlled substance use may have been a factor.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Deviation from Grievance Procedure The Employer agrees that, after a grievance has been discussed at Step 2 of the grievance procedure the Employer or his representatives shall not initiate any discussion or negotiations with respect to the grievance, either directly or indirectly with the aggrieved employee without the consent of the xxxxxxx or the Union.

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES a. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this Agreement that is not disposed of by Agreement, shall be reviewed by C/CAG’s Finance Department. b. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, Consultant may request a review by C/CAG’s Finance Department of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. c. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by C/CAG will excuse Consultant from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. d. Consultant and subconsultant Agreements, including cost proposals and Indirect Cost Rates (ICR), may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an Agreement audit, an incurred cost audit, an ICR Audit, or a CPA ICR audit work paper review. If selected for audit or review, the Agreement, cost proposal and ICR and related work papers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR audit work paper review it is Consultant’s responsibility to ensure federal, C/CAG, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s work papers including making copies as necessary. The Agreement, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by Consultant and approved by C/CAG Contract Administrator to conform to the audit or review recommendations. Consultant agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the Agreement by this reference if directed by C/CAG at its sole discretion. Refusal by Consultant to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, C/CAG or local governments have access to CPA work papers, will be considered a breach of Agreement terms and cause for termination of the Agreement and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!