Xxxxxx Performing Teachers. 1. Poorly performing teachers refers to teachers identified though the evaluation process set forth in this policy who demonstrate an inability and/or unwillingness to meet the reasonable expectations of this standards- based evaluation system. 2. Comparable evaluations should be derived from multiple summative ratings. Starting in the 2013/14 school year, a teacher will receive a point total of four (4) for accomplished, three (3) for proficient, two (2) for developing and one (1) for ineffective. In a three-year period of time, a teacher will have a rating of three (3) thru twelve (12). Any teacher with a score of twelve (12) over three years would be in group one, teachers with score of four (4) through (11) would be in group two, and teachers with a score of three (3) would be in group three. Each separate group would be considered “comparable”, with group one being the highest rated. Total scores would always be considered as consisting of the most recent three years’ worth of data.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Xxxxxx Performing Teachers. 1. Poorly performing teachers refers to teachers identified though the evaluation process set forth in this policy who demonstrate an inability and/or unwillingness to meet the reasonable expectations of this standards- standards-based evaluation system.
2. Comparable evaluations should be derived from multiple summative ratings. Starting in the 2013/14 school year, a teacher will receive a point total of four (4) for accomplished, three (3) for proficient, two (2) for developing and one (1) for ineffective. In a three-year period of time, a teacher will have a rating of three (3) thru twelve (12). Any teacher with a score of twelve (12) over three years would be in group one, teachers with a score of four (4) through (11) would be in group two, and teachers with a score of three (3) would be in group three. Each separate group would be considered “comparable”, with group one being the highest rated. Total scores would always be considered as consisting of the most recent three years’ worth of data.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Xxxxxx Performing Teachers. 1. Poorly performing teachers refers to teachers identified though the evaluation process set forth in this policy who demonstrate an inability and/or unwillingness to meet the reasonable expectations of this standards- standards based evaluation system.
2. Comparable evaluations should be derived from multiple summative ratings. Starting in the 2013/14 school year, a teacher will receive a point total of four (4) for accomplished, three (3) for proficient, two (2) for developing and one (1) for ineffective. In a three-year period of time, a teacher will have a rating of three (3) thru twelve (12). Any teacher with a score of twelve (12) over three years would be in group one, teachers with a score of four (4) through (11) would be in group two, and teachers with a score of three (3) would be in group three. Each separate group would be considered “comparable”, with group one being the highest rated. Total scores would always be considered as consisting of the most recent three years’ worth of data.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement