Case 1 definition

Case 1. ' (negotiations) means any case where negotiations take place between the parties with a view to the formation of a business relationship between them;

Case 1 means circumstances where a PRA-authorised person is the UK parent institution required by Chapter 2 of Title 2 of Part 1 of the capital requirements regulation to comply with requirements of the regulation on a consolidated basis, other than circumstances falling within Case 3;

Case 1 means any case where the parties form or resolve to form a business relationship between them.

Examples of Case 1 in a sentence

• The cost or credit to the Owner from a change in the Work shall be determined in one or more of the following ways: Case 1.

• Case 1- The index goes up• An investor sells the Nifty Option described above before expiry:Suppose the Nifty index moves up to 3600 in the spot market and the premium has moved to Rs 200 and there are 15 days more left for the expiry.

• Case 1- The index goes up• An investor sells the Nifty Option described above before expiry:Suppose the Nifty 50 Index moves up to 3600 in the spot market and the premium has moved to Rs 200 and there are 15 days more left for the expiry.

• In two further organizations (Case 1 and 3), additional participants (e.g. general manager, waste coordinator, finance manager) were recruited following recommendation from their colleagues.

• Case 1- The index goes upo An investor sells the Nifty Option described above before expiry:Suppose the Nifty index moves up to 3600 in the spot market and the premium has moved to Rs 200 and there are 15 days more left for the expiry.

More Definitions of Case 1

Case 1 means a Leverage Ratio of less than 3.25 to 1.00.

Case 1. Case 2", "Case 3", "Case 4", "Case 5", "Case 6", "Case 7" and "Line of Credit Fee", by substituting the following definitions in lieu thereof and by adding the terms "Motor Sports Division", "Motor Sports Division Report", "Second Amendment", and "Second Amendment Closing Date", and the following definitions thereof, each in the appropriate alphabetical order:

Case 1. The Peerless Loan is not completely reduced

Case 1. We assume that no critical Conf/Deny query occurred, and therefore no incon- sistency in the way B responded to Conf/Deny queries could have occurred. In this case, with probability at least η/(µ1ρ), E’s output would have been (XI∗, m∗, σ∗) = (XJ , mj, σj). In addition, E would not have made a USign query on XJ , mj, and would not have made a Corrupt query on XJ , so B would have not have aborted during the simulation. In this case, B solves the CDH problem if β = 0 and (XI∗, m∗, σ∗) = (XJ , mj, σj), which occurs with probability at least η/(2µ1ρ) and in time τ .

Case 1. This reservation agreement is subject to the condition precedent of obtaining the loan / loans referred to above. As an essential condition of the reservation, the GRANTOR and the GRANTEE agree that:

Case 1 the test session has a matching session S S

Case 1 means a start-up scenario at the Kings Valley Project delivering 689,850 tonnes of dry mill feed per year for 20 years;