Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.
Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”
Program Monitoring The Contractor will make all records and documents required under this Agreement as outlined here, in OEC Policies and NHECC Policies available to the SRO or its designee, the SR Fiscal Officer or their designee and the OEC. Scheduled monitoring visits will take place twice a year. The SRO and OEC reserve the right to make unannounced visits.
Program Management 1.1.01 Implement and operate an Immunization Program as a Responsible Entity
1.1.02 Identify at least one individual to act as the program contact in the following areas:
1. Immunization Program Manager;
ANALYSIS AND MONITORING The Custodian shall (a) provide the Fund (or its duly-authorized investment manager or investment adviser) with an analysis of the custody risks associated with maintaining assets with the Eligible Securities Depositories set forth on Schedule B hereto in accordance with section (a)(1)(i)(A) of Rule 17f-7, and (b) monitor such risks on a continuing basis, and promptly notify the Fund (or its duly-authorized investment manager or investment adviser) of any material change in such risks, in accordance with section (a)(1)(i)(B) of Rule 17f-7.
Information Systems Acquisition Development and Maintenance a. Client Data – Client Data will only be used by State Street for the purposes specified in this Agreement.
Information Management Information and Records
Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.
TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.
(b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation.
(c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled.
(d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.
Support and Services ISD and HC agree to the following conditions:
A. HC agrees to the following for both the mathematics and English language arts courses:
i. To share data and provide feedback regarding student success on entry‐level college mathematics and English language arts courses;
ii. To train advisors to recognize and honor course(s) on school district transcripts;
iii. To ensure that eligible students are counseled directly into college level mathematics, English language arts, and all other courses that require mathematics and English language arts college readiness;
B. HC agrees to the following for the college preparatory mathematics courses:
i. To provide the Student Learning Outcomes;
ii. To provide the syllabi for the courses being offered.
iii. To provide regular meetings between the HC faculty and ISD faculty teaching the course.
C. HC agrees to the following for the college preparatory English language arts course:
i. To provide the Student Learning Outcomes for Integrated Reading/Writing (INRW 0303) course;
ii. To provide the syllabi, including types of essays required (i.e., expository, persuasive, and critical analysis).
iii. To provide regular meetings between the HC faculty and ISD faculty teaching the course.
D. ISD agrees to the following for both the mathematics and English language arts courses:
i. To provide highly qualified instructors for the courses being taught;
ii. To identify students who are not college ready as stated in HB 5;
iii. To provide professional development and resources required to teach the mathematics and English language arts courses;
iv. To identify successful completion of the course(s) on the student transcripts as determined by the State of Texas PEIMS number;
v. To provide curriculum for the course that is consistent with HC Student Learning Outcomes;
vi. To provide assistance with admission, enrollment, and financial aid applications;
E. ISD agrees to the following for the college preparatory mathematics course:
i. To teach a math course designed to focus on college mathematics (algebraic or non‐algebraic) concepts;
ii. Require students to meet college readiness scores on the TSI Assessment;
iii. To meet regularly with HC faculty.
F. ISD agrees to the following for the college preparatory English language arts course:
i. To teach an integrated Reading and Writing course that focuses on critical reading and college‐level writing;
ii. Require students to meet college readiness scores on the TSI Assessment;
iii. To meet regularly with HC faculty.
