Case 2 Sample Clauses

Case 2. In Protocol 1, case 4 was satisfied for Ppred at subround t + j′. This means Ppred received (sid, v, vk, σ) and a valid signature σ, and sent it to all of its neighbors, and in particular Pi′ would receive this message by subround t + j′ + 1. Assume Pi′ has not already output (vk, sid, v′, GradeKeyi′ (vk, sid)) for v′ ∈ {v, ⊥} (otherwise we are already done). In that case, for Pi′ it must hold that Bvk,sid = 0. By Inequality 3.1, GradeKeyi′ (vk, sid) > 0; hence, one of the following must be the case:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Case 2. If m2 ≥ |A| we use the fact that M is weakly k-right concellative with respect to the set of generators A. In order to verify condition (P), it suffices to show conditions (i) and (ii) hold with {R(x, x') | x, x' ∈ X} replaced by the broader family [ ] , the set of all k-tuples of A. This is because for each x, x' and a / R(x, x') we may verify (i) and (ii) for R ∈ A with a ∈/ R and R(x, x') ⊆ R. Thus, we need 1 − (k + 1)e |A|
Case 2. In the case when the in-degree of the node is three, the subgroup under this node is composed of three subgroups G1, G2, G3 under three nodes, respectively. Assume that the subgroup key KGi (i = 1, 2, 3) of Gi has been established, then the coordi- nator of Gi (i = 1, 2, 3) broadcasts KGi in other subgroups if it is unknown to them. After that, each member in G1 ∪ G2 ∪ U3 is able to derive a new sub- group key KG1 ∪G2 ∪G3 = h(eˆ( , )KG1 KG2 KG3 ). For example, in Fig. 6, the secret key k(2) = is a special case of mass leave. After mass leaving, a new group key for the rest of the peer group is reached in two steps. h(eˆ( , )r1 k2 k3 ) for the subgroup under 3-in- degree node k(2) can be established after U1 and U4 broadcast r1G and k(1)G, respectively, because k(1)G Step 1 . (Graph Reconstruct) After mass leaving, the key agreement graph for the rest of the group is recon- structed according to the three rules: (1) After a member leaves, remove the member node and the edge with the member node as an initial node as well; (2) If there is no member under a node, remove the node and all edges with the node as the initial node or the terminal node; (3) If the in-degree of a node is one, remove the node. After that, the key agreement graph maintained in the public server is updated accordingly. For example, in Fig. 2, after U2, U3, U5, U10, U11, U12, U13, U15 leave the peer group, the key agreement graph for the rest of the group is reconstructed as shown in Fig. 6.
Case 2. Xxxxxx Schemes‌ Xxxxxx’x rule is an algorithm for polynomial computation that reduces the number of multiplications and results in a computationally efficient form [OS12]. For a polyno- mial in one variable
Case 2. If vehicle is demanded (requirement) on Monday, then 03(three) working days will be completed on Wednesday and penalty will be implemented from Thursday.

Related to Case 2

  • Case Management Prompt resolution of any dispute is important to both parties; and the parties agree that the arbitration of any dispute shall be conducted expeditiously. The arbitrators are instructed and directed to assume case management initiative and control over the arbitration process (including scheduling of events, pre-hearing discovery and activities, and the conduct of the hearing), in order to complete the arbitration as expeditiously as is reasonably practical for obtaining a just resolution of the dispute.

  • Check Meters Developer, at its option and expense, may install and operate, on its premises and on its side of the Point of Interconnection, one or more check meters to check Connecting Transmission Owner’s meters. Such check meters shall be for check purposes only and shall not be used for the measurement of power flows for purposes of this Agreement, except as provided in Article 7.4 below. The check meters shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection and examination by Connecting Transmission Owner or its designee. The installation, operation and maintenance thereof shall be performed entirely by Developer in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • CFR 200 328. Failure to submit such required Performance Reports may cause a delay or suspension of funding. 30 ILCS 705/1 et seq.

  • Start-Up and Synchronization Consistent with the mutually acceptable procedures of the Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner, the Developer is responsible for the proper synchronization of the Large Generating Facility to the New York State Transmission System in accordance with NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner procedures and requirements.

  • Usage Measurement Usage measurement for calls shall begin when answer supervision or equivalent Signaling System 7 (SS7) message is received from the terminating office and shall end at the time of call disconnect by the calling or called subscriber, whichever occurs first.

  • Table 2 Determinations Determination Concerning Determiner 2.8.2.7 Complaints and Grievances Under the Decision Making Model

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!