Examples of Continuous Disclosure Rules in a sentence
Continuous Disclosure Rules means the continuous disclosure rules as defined in subsection 9(4) of WEMA; Country Facilities means the facilities in New South Wales and Victoria other than the Port Terminal at which the Port Operator receives and stores Bulk Wheat and other commodities.
The Continuous Disclosure Rules contain specific exceptions which, if applicable, mean that disclosure may be not required or is deferred.
The Port Operator must, as a condition of this Undertaking, comply with the Continuous Disclosure Rules under the WEMA from time to time as they relate to Port Terminal Services.
The Port Operator must comply with the Continuous Disclosure Rules as they relate to the Port Terminal Services.
The Company is required to provide this information even if an exception to the Continuous Disclosure Rules applies.
The purpose of this policy is to: assist the Company to comply with its continuous disclosure obligations imposed by law including the Corporations Act and ASX Listing Rules; design procedures so that all shareholders have equal and timely access to material information about the Company and its prospects; and assist the Company and individual officers to comply with the Continuous Disclosure Rules (which carry serious penalties).
Exceptions The Continuous Disclosure Rules contain specific exceptions which, if applicable, mean that disclosure may not be required or is deferred.
In compliance with ASX Continuous Disclosure Rules, Genetic Technologies Limited (ASX: GTG; NASDAQ: GENE) is pleased to report it has now executed a Settlement and Release Agreement with Genelex Corporation of Seattle, Washington, USA.In late 2012, GTG reported that it had filed suit against Genelex Corporation in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle, under its Assertion program in USA.
Second, a cross-sectional design was adopted entailing possible errors in measurement (e.g. self-reported binge eating may be more reliant on the experience of a loss of control than having eaten an objectively large amount of food; Telch, Pratt & Niego, 1998), the preclusion of causal inferences, and the possibility that demand characteristics may have affected outcomes.
The Council of course accepted a building of a very similar scale and height in 2007, and its impact on the Royal Artillery Barracks539.