Examples of Development Evaluation Criteria in a sentence
Include a narrative addressing each of the Development Evaluation Criteria, demonstrating how the Application meets each of these criteria, and providing a specific explanation and justification of the points sought for each scoring item.
Applications must meet all requirements of the applicable QAP and must meet at least the minimum Development Evaluation Criteria score specified in Section 9, below, to receive an Allocation of Housing Credits.
For purposes of this QAP and HC Awards and Allocations, the QAP Selection Criteria include all of the requirements, considerations, factors, limitations, Development Evaluation Criteria, set asides, priorities and data set forth in this QAP and all federal requirements.
Development Evaluation Criteria scoring is only one of several considerations taken into account by the MBOH Board and does not control the selection of Projects that will receive an Award of Housing Credits.
Applications meeting all minimum Threshold Requirements and not excluded from further consideration under this QAP will be evaluated for the amount of Credits needed for feasibil- ity and long term viability and will be evaluated and scored according to the Development Evaluation Criteria section below.
Developments not scoring the minimum Development Evaluation Criteria score of 1000 of the total possible 1260 available points will not receive further consideration.Non-competitive 4% Credit Bond Deals will meet at least a minimum threshold of 800 of the total possible 1260 available points to qualify for further consideration.
In addition to evaluation under all other QAP Selection Criteria, Applications will be evaluated and scored according to the following Development Evaluation Criteria.Awarding of points to Projects pursuant to these Development Evaluation Criteria is for purposes of determining that the Projects meet at least a minimum threshold of 1000 of the total possible 1260 available points to qualify for further consideration.
If the Project giving rise to the negative points would have received a lower Development Evaluation Criteria score under the QAP under which the Project initially was evaluated, scored and awarded credits had the poor track record, management weakness or failure to respond been known as of Application scoring, the negative points assigned with respect to a Development Team member from the earlier Application will be the number of points corresponding to the difference in scoring that would have resulted.
Developments not scoring the minimum Development Evaluation Criteria score of 1000 points (or 800 points for non-competitive 4% Credit Bond Deals) will not receive further consideration.
Non-competitive developments not scoring the minimum Development Evaluation Criteria score of 800 of the total possible 1260 available points will not receive further consideration.The Development Evaluation Criteria, other QAP Selection Criteria and information submitted or obtained with respect to Projects will be used to assist the MBOH Board in evaluating and comparing Projects.Development Evaluation Criteria scoring is only one of several considerations taken into account by the MBOH Board.