Examples of European Prospectus Regulation in a sentence
This pro forma financial information has been prepared based on the 2017 consolidated financial statements under IFRS rules as adopted by the European Union and in accordance with the provisions of Appendix II of the European Prospectus Regulation, recommendations issued by ESMA (ex-CSR) in February 2005, as well as recommendation 2013-08 of the Autorité des Marchés Financiers on pro forma financial information.
The Holder of this Warrant, by acceptance hereof, acknowledges that neither this Warrant nor the Warrant Shares issuable upon exercise of this Warrant have been registered under the Securities Act, any applicable state securities laws or other applicable securities laws (including, but not limited to, the European Prospectus Regulation (EU) 2017/1129).
Except as included therein, no historical or pro forma financial statements or supporting schedules are required to be included or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement, the General Disclosure Package, the Prospectus, or the European Prospectus under the 1933 Act or the 1933 Act Regulations, the Belgian Prospectus Law or the European Prospectus Regulation.
According to the definition in the European Prospectus Regulation, securities are transferable assets that can be traded on the capital market.
The FinSA also introduces a new prospectus exemption for admission to trading on trading segments that are only open to professional clients.By contrast to the European Prospectus Regulation, which contains a number of ex- emptions for admission to trading verbatim mirroring the offering exemptions, this technical duplication is missing in the FinSA.
Each Dealer understands that the Base Listing Particulars is not a prospectus and has not been prepared in accordance with the prospectus requirements provided for in the Swedish Financial Instruments Trading Act (lag (1991:980) xx xxxxxx med finansiella instrument), European Prospectus Regulation ((EU) 2017/1129) nor any other Swedish enactment.
In many cases, thecentral question here is whether the structure of the tokens constitutes a security within the meaning of the European Prospectus Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2017/1129) and the German Securities Prospectus Act (Wertpapierprospektgesetz – WpPG).In order to increase legal certainty regarding the regulatory classification of tokens in the field of securities supervision, BaFin published an initial advisory letter on 20 February2018 (reference WA 11-QB 4100-2017/0010).
For employee offerings the FinSA is more liberal than the European Prospectus Regulation in that it no longer requires that “details of the offer” be provided; while this requirement was still contained in the draft FinSA, the parliament acknowledged that this would have created substantial le- gal uncertainty.
While these exemptions largely mirror the new European Prospectus Regulation, including in particular the recently increased offering limit of CHF 8 million, the Swiss Parliament deviated from the EU regulation when in the final legislative efforts it increased the private clients exemption from 150 to 500 investors.