Examples of Franchise Law in a sentence
After the court dismissed several of the defendant’s counterclaims, in June 2021 the defendant filed an amended counterclaim alleging breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, fraudulent inducement, fraud, and unlawful practices under New York Franchise Law.
This municipal charge results from implementation of House Bill 1777 – Telecommunications Franchise Law which allows all municipalities to be compensated by CTPs for right-of-way usage.
Her article "California Amends Franchise Law: What Restaurants Need to Know", highlights Assembly Bill (“AB”) 676 going into effect as of January 1, 2023, significantly amending the California Franchise Relations Act and Franchise Investment Law.
If an offender 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 is serving a prison term as a risk reduction sentence under sections 2929.143 and 5120.036 of the Revised Code, "stated prison term" includes any period of time by which the prison term imposed upon the offender is shortened by the offender's successful completion of all assessment and treatment or programming pursuant to those sections.
Rather, the Sixth Circuit vacated the arbitrator’s award because one of the franchisors had violated the Maryland Franchise Law by failing to disclose a felony conviction, reasoning:[T]he purpose of this provision of the Franchise Act is to allow parties to make informed decisions regarding whether to enter into a franchise agreement and with whom they choose to do business.
Tesla Motors’ Battle for Direct Sales: State Dealer Franchise Law and Politics,34 FRANCHISE L.J. 293, 305 (Winter 2015), available at http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/franchising_law_journal/Winter_2015/ FLJ%2034-3_01Stolze.authcheckdam.pdf; Todd Bishop, Tesla Wins Battle Against Auto Dealers in Washington State, But Future Rivals Are Screwed, GEEKWIRE (Feb.
Yet, the Plaintiffs insist that, “by the express terms of the Franchise Agreement, the arbitration [clause]’s incompatibility with the [Maryland Franchise Law] renders it void,” because, “when the contract as a whole is examined,” the contract “recognize[s] that certain state laws, expressly including the [Maryland Franchise Law], will control and govern [its] terms,” and “the Maryland Clauses.
Our members and the members of the Franchise Law Committee represent a diverse cross- section of franchisors, franchisees including master franchisors, master franchisees, and other suppliers of goods and services to the franchising sector.
Specifically, the Plaintiffs argue that the Arbitration Clause is “in direct conflict with the provisions of COMAR 02.02.08.16(L)(3), which prohibits any waiver by the franchisee of its right to file a claim arising under the [Maryland Franchise Law] in anycourt of competent jurisdiction in the State of Maryland.” Id. at 9.
Thus, the Plaintiffs contend that, although the claims that Defendants brought in arbitration do not arise under the [Maryland Franchise Law], they are compulsory counterclaims to the Plaintiffs’ claims under Fed.