Maximum extent practicable definition

Maximum extent practicable means the highest level of performance that is achievable but is not equivalent to a performance standard identified in this ordinance as determined in accordance with S. 055 of this ordinance.
Maximum extent practicable or "MEP" means the technology-based discharge standard for municipal separate storm sewer systems established by CWA § 402(p). MEP is achieved, in part, by selecting and implementing effective structural and nonstructural best management practices (BMPs) and rejecting ineffective BMPs and replacing them with effective best management practices (BMPs). MEP is an iterative standard, which evolves over time as urban runoff management knowledge increases. As such, the operator's MS4 program must continually be assessed and modified to incorporate improved programs, control measures, BMPs, etc., to attain compliance with water quality standards.
Maximum extent practicable means, for the purpose of these Regulations, using stormwater management measures, techniques and methods that are available and capable of being implemented while taking into consideration cost, available technology, and project site constraints.

Examples of Maximum extent practicable in a sentence

  • Maximum extent practicable applies when a person who is subject to a performance standard of this Chapter demonstrates to the Village Engineer’s satisfaction that a performance standard is not achievable and that a lower level of performance is appropriate.

  • Maximum extent practicable applies when a person who is subject to a performance standard of this ordinance demonstrates to the Village’s satisfaction that a performance standard is not achievable and that a lower level of performance is appropriate.


More Definitions of Maximum extent practicable

Maximum extent practicable means the highest level of effectiveness that can be achieved through staffing levels, training procedures, deployment and tabletop drills incorporating lessons learned, use of enhanced skimming techniques and other best achievable technology. In deter- mining what the maximum extent practicable is, the director shall consider the effectiveness, engineering feasibility, com- mercial availability, safety, and the cost of the measures.
Maximum extent practicable means designing stormwater management systems so that all reasonable opportunities for using non-structural stormwater practices are exhausted and a structural BMP is implemented only where absolutely necessary
Maximum extent practicable or “MEP” means the statutory standard (33 U.S.C.
Maximum extent practicable or “MEP” means the statutory standard (33 U.S.C. § 1342[p][3][B][iii]) that establishes the level of pollutant reductions that an owner or operator of a regulated MS4s must achieve. The USEPA has intentionally not provided a precise definition of MEP to allow maximum flexibility in MS4 permitting. The pollutant reductions that represent MEP may be different for each MS4, given the unique local hydrologic and geologic concerns that may exist and the differing pollutant control strategies. Therefore, the Permittee will determine appropriate BMPs to satisfy each of the MCMs through an evaluative process. The USEPA envisions application of the MEP standard as an iterative process.
Maximum extent practicable means to the maximum extent after weighing, evaluating and interpreting alternatives to protect the ecological integrity of a wetland or State open water.
Maximum extent practicable or "MEP" means economically achievable measures for the control of the addition of pollutants from existing and new categories and classes of nonpoint sources of pollution, which reflect the greatest degree of pollutant reduction achievable through the application of the best available nonpoint pollution control practices, technologies, processes, siting criteria, operating methods or other alternatives.
Maximum extent practicable means the highest level of effectiveness that can be achieved through staffing levels, training procedures and best achievable technology considering the effectiveness, engineering feasibility, commercial availability, safety and cost of the measures.