Examples of Petition for hearing in a sentence
On February 23, 2022, the Board retained the Petition for hearing and assigned President Fiordaliso as Presiding Officer.
Indeed, a trial judge has the discretion to reserve the determination of a pending application already argued but not determined and combine same with a Petition for hearing.
Petition for hearing; temporary detention ............................................
On June 29, 2022, the Board retained the Petition for hearing and, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 48:2-32, designated me as the Presiding Officer authorized to rule on all motions that arise during the pendency of these proceedings to secure a just and expeditious determination of the issues (“June 29, 2022 Order”).
Once the defects are rectified to the satisfaction of the Commission, the Commission may admit the Petition for hearing without requiring the attendance of the party filing the Petition.
Including the child’s residences for the past five years may alert the Court to important information about whether Iowa has subject matter jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus and may also be used by the Court to evaluate whether the petitioner seeking a writ has been excessively dilatory in asserting their custodial rights to a child, which may either affect how quickly the Court sets a Petition for hearing or whether the Court is willing to issue a writ at all.
Where the Commission is unable to schedule the Petition for hearing within this time period or where the Petitioner requests for extension of time, the Commission may extend the time limit for such additional period as it may specify and shall give reasons for such extension; Provided however, that any such extension shall be preceded by at least seven day notice prior to the expiration of the forty five (45) days.
On June 29, 2022, the Board retained the Petition for hearing and, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 48:2-32, designated me, President Fiordaliso, as the presiding officer authorized to rule on all motions that arise during the pendency of these proceedings and to modify any schedules that may be set as necessary to secure a just and expeditious determination of the issues.
The Madras High Court had fixed the Petition for hearing on 2 December 2013.
Shukh’s current Petition does not contain a single argument regarding FilmTec that was not already considered and rejected by this Court when denying his first Petition for hearing en banc.There is no suggestion in the Per Curiam denial of Shukh’s first Petition that a single judge on this Court thought his Petition presented a question of exceptional importance or found Shukh’s arguments identifying purported precedential conflicts persuasive.