Sovereignty means the supremacy of the State;
Sovereignty. God is sovereign over all events, but He does allow human freedom as He xxxxx. He has ultimate authority over all things past, present, and future and most importantly He is sovereign over our salvation (2 Xxxxxx 7:28, 1 Chronicles 29:10-13, Psalms 103:19, Genesis 50:20, Romans 1:18-32; 8:28] ➡ Transcendence: God is completely distinct from anything else in the universe. It is comforting to know that his greatness and power is unsurpassed in all of the world (Genesis 1:1, Psalms 102:25-27, Isaiah 42:5, Acts 17:24, 1 Xxxx 2:15-17).
Sovereignty means that the decree of sovereign makes law, and foreign courts cannot condemn influences persuading sovereign to make the decree.” Moscow Fire Ins. Co. of Moscow, Russia v. Bank of New York & Trust Co., 294 N.Y.S. 648, 662, 161 Misc. 903.; The people of this State, as the successors of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am. Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7.
Examples of Sovereignty in a sentence
Gender, Sovereignty and the Rise of a Sexual Security Regime in International Law and Postcolonial India, Melbourne Journal of International law 14 (2) (2013), p.
Focusing on heterosexual couples in traditional nuclear households, the results of the survey uncover the relative position of male and female partners in influencing individual entitlements.
James Boyle, Foucault in Cyberspace: Surveillance, Sovereignty, and Hardwired Censors, 66 U.
Sovereignty and Slow Food Movements, which aim to regain local control of food production, exchange and consumption infrastructure, enhance fair trade in food products, and ensure the socio-economic sustainability of smallholder farmers and their families (Blay-Palmer 2010: 4-5).
The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements.
More Definitions of Sovereignty
Sovereignty. An Institutional Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 21, no. 1 (1988): 66–94. Xxxxxx, X., X. Bernhard, and X. Hänggli. “The Politics of Campaigning – Dimensions of Strategic Action.” In Politik in der Mediendemokratie, edited by X. Xxxxxxxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx, 345–365. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2009. Xxxxxxx, X. “Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx and the Catch-All Party.” West European Politics 26, no. 2 (2003): 23–40. . Party Transformations in European Democracies. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2012. . “The Catch-All Party in Western Europe, 1945-1990: A Study in Arrested Devel- opment.” PhD diss., Free University of Amsterdam, 1999. Xxxx, X.-E., and S. O. Ersson. Politics and Society in Western Europe. London: Sage, 1994. Xxxxxx, X., and X. X. Xxxxx, eds. When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organisations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988. , eds. When Parties Prosper: the Uses of Electoral Success. Boulder: Xxxxx Xxxxxx, 2007. Xxxxxxxx, X. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65, no. 3 (1971): 682–693. . The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968. . Verzuiling, Pacificatie en Kentering in de Nederlandse Politiek. 1971. Haarlem: Xxxxx, 1990 [1971]. Xxxxxx, X. X., and X. Xxxxxx, eds. Party Systems and voter alignments: cross-national perspectives. New York: Free Press, 1967. Xxxxxx, X. “Explaining Hamas’s Changing Electoral Strategy, 1996-2006.” Government and Opposition 48, no. 4 (2013): 570–593. Xxxxxxx, R. F. M. Persoonlijke Herinneringen. Amsterdam: Balans, 2018. Xxxxxxx, X. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29, no. 4 (2000): 507–548. Xxxxxxxxxx, S., X. Xxxxxxxxx, and X. España-Najera. “Extra- and within-system volatil- ity.” Party Politics 23, no. 6 (2017): 623–635. Xxxx, X. “Adaptation and Control: Towards an Understanding of Party and Party System Change (1983).” In On Parties, Party Systems and Democracy: Selected Writings of Xxxxx Xxxx, edited by I. van Biezen, 162–185. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2014. . “Electoral Volatility and the Dutch Party System: a Comparative Perspective.” . Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. Xxxx, P., and I. van Biezen. “Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980- 2000.” Party Politics 7, no. 1 (2001): 5–21. Xxxx, P., and X. Xxxxx. “The Party Family and its Study.” Annual Review of Political Scienc...
Sovereignty means that development of natural resources “must be exercised in the interest of their national development and of the well-being of the people of the State concerned” (Res.1803 UN GA of 14.12.1962) (international demand vs national supply)
Sovereignty means the power to make and enforce law in general terms.93 It is more limited than Tino Rangatiratanga, as it derives only from human sources and manifests itself in human-made rules and laws.94. The sovereignty currently exercised by the Crown cannot co-exist with Tino Rangatiratanga. As the Tuhoe Report stated:
Sovereignty. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, June 22, 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sovereignty/. Read, James H. “James Wilson AND THE IDEA OF POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY.” In Power versus Liberty: Madison, Hamilton, Wilson, and Jefferson, 90. University of Virginia Press, 2000. Remete, Mark. “An Analysis of Cicero’s Pro Caecina: Piso’s Argument From A Statutory Interpretation Perspective.” Revista Jurídica, 2018. Richard, Carl J. “Classical Antiquity and Early Conceptions of the United States Senate.” Essay. In Classical Antiquity and the Politics of America: From George Washington to George W. Bush, edited by Michael Meckler, 29–39. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011. ———. The Founders and the Classics: Greece, Rome, and the American Enlightenment. Cambridge etc.: Harvard University Press, 1996. ———. The Golden Age of the Classics in America: Greece, Rome, and the Antebellum United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009. Riggsby, Andrew M. Roman Law and the Legal World of the Romans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Robinson, Daniel N. “The Scottish Enlightenment and the American Founding.” The Monist 90, no. 2 (2007): 170–81.
Sovereignty. The Supreme Court ducks. Con- xxxxx sleeps. Indians rule., The American En- terprise, Sept. 2004 31 Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Appellate Courts as First Re- sponders: The Constitutionality and Propriety of Appellate Courts’ Resolving Issues in the First Instance, 87 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1521 (2012) .......................................................................27 Xxxx Xxxxx, Second Treatise of Government 87 (R. Xxx xx. 1982). 20
Sovereignty. The Supreme Court ducks. Congress sleeps. Indians rule., The American Enterprise, Sept. 2004, at 31. Like many state-based governments, en- tirely located within historic reservations, the Towns of Xxxxxx and Verona, as well as the City of Xxxxxxxx face eventual extinction. They have no way to survive the ever-growing tribal purchases of land, with ever growing casino revenue, followed by fee-to-trust appli- cations. Eventually, the loss of the Towns’ and City’s ability to tax and regulate, will be fatal. See App. F Maps of Oneida Reservation, Town of Verona, Town of Xxxxxx, and City of Xxxxxxxx. And the legal issues at stake are significant in their own right. “It is difficult to imagine a principle more essential to democratic government than that upon which the doctrine of unconstitutional delegation is founded. ” Xxxxxxxxx v. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, 000 X.X. 000, 7 See xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/commission/gaming-revenue-reports.
Sovereignty means "supremacy in respect of power,