Sovereignty means the supremacy of the State;
Sovereignty. God is sovereign over all events, but He does allow human freedom as He xxxxx. He has ultimate authority over all things past, present, and future and most importantly He is sovereign over our salvation (2 Xxxxxx 7:28, 1 Chronicles 29:10-13, Psalms 103:19, Genesis 50:20, Romans 1:18-32; 8:28] ➡ Transcendence: God is completely distinct from anything else in the universe. It is comforting to know that his greatness and power is unsurpassed in all of the world (Genesis 1:1, Psalms 102:25-27, Isaiah 42:5, Acts 17:24, 1 Xxxx 2:15-17).
Sovereignty means that the decree of sovereign makes law, and foreign courts cannot condemn influences persuading sovereign to make the decree.” Moscow Fire Ins. Co. of Moscow, Russia v. Bank of New York & Trust Co., 294 N.Y.S. 648, 662, 161 Misc. 903.; The people of this State, as the successors of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am. Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7.
Examples of Sovereignty in a sentence
The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements.
The Sovereignty of God in creation, providence, revelation, redemption and final judgment.
Sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them.
Davidson, Cooperative Localism: Federal-Local Collaboration in an Era of State Sovereignty, 93 VA.
Carl Schmitt, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, trans.
More Definitions of Sovereignty
Sovereignty means that development of natural resources “must be exercised in the interest of their national development and of the well-being of the people of the State concerned” (Res.1803 UN GA of 14.12.1962)
Sovereignty. An Institutional Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 21, no. 1 (1988): 66–94. Xxxxxx, X., X. Bernhard, and X. Hänggli. “The Politics of Campaigning – Dimensions of Strategic Action.” In Politik in der Mediendemokratie, edited by X. Xxxxxxxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx, 345–365. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2009. Xxxxxxx, X. “Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx and the Catch-All Party.” West European Politics 26, no. 2 (2003): 23–40. . Party Transformations in European Democracies. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2012. . “The Catch-All Party in Western Europe, 1945-1990: A Study in Arrested Devel- opment.” PhD diss., Free University of Amsterdam, 1999. Xxxx, X.-E., and S. O. Ersson. Politics and Society in Western Europe. London: Sage, 1994. Xxxxxx, X., and X. X. Xxxxx, eds. When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organisations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988. , eds. When Parties Prosper: the Uses of Electoral Success. Boulder: Xxxxx Xxxxxx, 2007. Xxxxxxxx, X. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65, no. 3 (1971): 682–693. . The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968. . Verzuiling, Pacificatie en Kentering in de Nederlandse Politiek. 1971. Haarlem: Xxxxx, 1990 [1971]. Xxxxxx, X. X., and X. Xxxxxx, eds. Party Systems and voter alignments: cross-national perspectives. New York: Free Press, 1967. Xxxxxx, X. “Explaining Hamas’s Changing Electoral Strategy, 1996-2006.” Government and Opposition 48, no. 4 (2013): 570–593. Xxxxxxx, R. F. M. Persoonlijke Herinneringen. Amsterdam: Balans, 2018. Xxxxxxx, X. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29, no. 4 (2000): 507–548. Xxxxxxxxxx, S., X. Xxxxxxxxx, and X. España-Najera. “Extra- and within-system volatil- ity.” Party Politics 23, no. 6 (2017): 623–635. Xxxx, X. “Adaptation and Control: Towards an Understanding of Party and Party System Change (1983).” In On Parties, Party Systems and Democracy: Selected Writings of Xxxxx Xxxx, edited by I. van Biezen, 162–185. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2014. . “Electoral Volatility and the Dutch Party System: a Comparative Perspective.” Acta Politica 43 (2008): 235–253. . Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. Xxxx, P., and I. van Biezen. “Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980- 2000.” Party Politics 7, no. 1 (2001): 5–21. Xxxx, P., and X. Xxxxx. “The Party Family and its Study.”...
Sovereignty the international accompaniment shall be understood to constitute support for the efforts of Colombia to achieve the implementation of the agreements and the building of peace successfully, in all cases respecting and taking into consideration the principle of sovereignty in relation to its decisions in the implementation of the agreements. International accompaniment shall also contribute to the effect of the duties and responsibilities of the state, defined in the Final Agreement, guaranteeing the rights of the citizens. • Impartiality: shall be based on respect for and confidence in the institutions, the content of the agreements and democratic values, as a guarantee to ensure that the implementation of such agreements contributes to the building of peace. • Provision of experience, technical capacity and resources: the support of the international accompaniment is rooted in the preparedness to share good practices, transfer of knowledge, experience and resources, to ensure success in the implementation of the agreements and peacebuilding.
Sovereignty the international observation shall be understood to constitute support for the efforts of Colombia to achieve the implementation of the agreements and the building of peace successfully, in all cases respecting and taking into consideration the principle of sovereignty in relation to its decisions in the implementation of the agreements. International observation shall also contribute to the effect of the duties and responsibilities of the state, defined in the Final Agreement, guaranteeing the rights of the citizens. • Impartiality: shall be based on respect for and confidence in the institutions, the content of the agreements and democratic values, as a guarantee to ensure that the implementation of such agreements contributes to the building of peace. • Provision of Experience, technical capacity and resources: the support of the international observation is rooted in the preparedness to share good practices, exchange knowledge, experience and resources, to ensure success in the implementation of the agreements and peace-building.
Sovereignty means to claim or exercise exclusive possession of territory, including exclusionary claims to in-situ resources, to navigation, or research
Sovereignty means the ability of a people, of each generation5 of citizens, to live under rules of their own choosing. After all, whose is a constitution? If the answer is “the citizens of country X”, this means nothing else than it is the constitution of the citizens current ly alive. This is the appropriate state of affairs since dead people can neither be benefited by possessing something, nor harmed by losing a property, including the capacity to rule after their death. But if a constitution is too difficult to change, the dead citizens of country X wield power over the living,6 and the past rules over the present. It might well not make a difference if those succeeding genera- tions share the values and views of their ancestors, but what if they happen not to? What if succeeding generations see some provi- sions of the constitution as a threat to their long-term well-being, or even as morally wrong? This problem is exacerbated when a sta- ble majority of the citizenry would like to reform the constitution but falls short of the required supermajority of 66% or even 75%. Can we call it “the rule of the people” or “popular sovereignty” if stable majorities (let’s say from 50% + 1 vote up to a three-fifths supermajority) of the present demos cannot change certain consti- tutional clauses for the simple reason that their forefathers put the bar for changing the constitution extremely high? “Generational sovereignty”7 is closely linked to the concept of “legitimacy” for two reasons, namely that
Sovereignty means that the decree of sovereign makes law, and foreign courts cannot condemn influences persuading sovereign to make the decree." Fire Ins. Co. of Moscow, Russia v. Bank of NY. & Trust Co.