Agreement Content Review Sample Clauses

Agreement Content Review. Agreement content reviews may be done occasionally to ensure accuracy of an agreement. Agreement content reviews can only be done by Terra Division Deans. Only 2 agreement content reviews are authorized on an agreement; after that a formal review by the appropriate faculty is needed. If a change is noted during the content review a document revision must be done. Name of Agreement being reviewed: Criminal Justice program at EHOVE Career Center The content in this agreement has been reviewed and found to be accurate for use. Name: Division/Title: Date Reviewed: Document Creation / Revision Date: April 23, 2015 Career Tech and Adult Education Program Articulation Agreement and Articulated Credit Guidelines Purpose: To describe the methods used when implementing an articulation agreement, renewing and amending an articulation agreement and awarding articulated credit (alternative credit) to students who have participated in a Career Tech (CT) program through a career center or high school or an Adult Education (AE) program through a career center. Agreement Process Implementation: The request for an articulation agreement may be initiated by the college, career center, high school or adult education program. A joint discussion among the faculty and administration from both institutions will convene to discuss interest and feasibility. If an agreement is deemed feasible, courses available, credit being awarded and terms and conditions will be documented in an articulation agreement for signatures from all interested parties. The new articulation agreement will be communicated to any additional interested parties as needed. Renewal/Amend: Articulation agreements will be periodically evaluated to ensure that they are accurate and are being effectively utilized. If an evaluation indicates that no revisions are needed, the area division Xxxx will sign-off on the Agreement Content Review sheet and the agreement will be renewed/left as is. If an evaluation indicates that revisions are needed the agreement will be amended through the implementation process. A request for an additional evaluation of an agreement may be initiated by the college, career center, high school or adult education program.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (19)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Agreement Content Review. Agreement content reviews may be done occasionally to ensure accuracy of an agreement. Agreement content reviews can only be done by Terra Division Deans. Only 2 agreement content reviews are authorized on an agreement; after that a formal review by the appropriate faculty is needed. If a change is noted during the content review a document revision must be done. Name of Agreement being reviewed: Business program at Vanguard Tech Center The content in this agreement has been reviewed and found to be accurate for use. Name: Division/Title: Date Reviewed: Document Creation / Revision Date: April 23, 2015 CAREER TECH AND ADULT EDUCATION PROGRAM ARTICULATION AGREEMENT AND ARTICULATED CREDIT GUIDELINES PURPOSE: To describe the methods used when implementing an articulation agreement, renewing and amending an articulation agreement and awarding articulated credit (alternative credit) to students who have participated in a Career Tech (CT) program through a career center or high school or an Adult Education (AE) program through a career center. AGREEMENT PROCESS
Sample 1See All (6)
Agreement Content Review. Agreement content reviews may be done occasionally to ensure accuracy of an agreement. Agreement content reviews can only be done by Terra Division Deans. Only 2 agreement content reviews are authorized on an agreement; after that a formal review by the appropriate faculty is needed. If a change is noted during the content review a document revision must be done. Name of Agreement being reviewed: Automotive Technology program at Vanguard-Sentinel Career and Technology Centers The content in this agreement has been reviewed and found to be accurate for use. Name: Division/Title: Date Reviewed: Document Creation / Revision Date: April 23, 2015 CAREER TECH AND ADULT EDUCATION PROGRAM ARTICULATION AGREEMENT AND ARTICULATED CREDIT GUIDELINES PURPOSE: To describe the methods used when implementing an articulation agreement, renewing and amending an articulation agreement and awarding articulated credit (alternative credit) to students who have participated in a Career Tech (CT) program through a career center or high school or an Adult Education (AE) program through a career center. AGREEMENT PROCESS
Sample 1

Related to Agreement Content Review

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.