Analytic Strategy Sample Clauses

Analytic Strategy. We consider the following: (1) the association between recent paternal incarceration and fathers’ parenting; (2) the association between recent paternal incarceration and mothers’ parenting; (3) the mechanisms underlying the association between recent paternal incarceration and fathers’ parenting; and (4) the association between recent paternal incarceration and mothers’ repartnering. Recent paternal incarceration and fathers’ parenting. In the first analytic stage, we use three methods, each which provides useful and distinct information, to estimate fathers’ parenting as a function of recent paternal incarceration: (1) ordinary least squared (OLS) regression models with covariate adjustment; (2) fixed-effect models; and (3) propensity score models. Because residential and nonresidential fathers parent across vastly different contexts and we expect any consequences of incarceration to be most pronounced for residential fathers, we present analyses separately by pre-incarceration residential status (residential status at the three- year survey). Theoretically, pre-incarceration residential status is not affected by recent paternal incarceration. The OLS models estimating fathers’ parenting are an important first step because they provide a baseline estimate of how paternal incarceration is associated with parenting after adjusting for observed differences between individuals. Model 1 adjusts for a wide array of control variables that precede recent incarceration, including prior incarceration. Model 2 includes these controls and also adjusts for a lagged dependent variable. Model 3 is restricted to fathers who reported prior incarceration. By examining only those who experienced prior incarceration, we diminish unobserved heterogeneity and strengthen causal inference. Note that limiting the sample to previously incarcerated men necessitates estimating the link between an additional incarceration and parenting. These and all models include city fixed-effects. Then, we take two additional steps to diminish unobserved and observed heterogeneity. In Model 4, we present fixed-effects models that estimate how entry into recent incarceration (n = 97 for residential fathers, n = 246 for nonresidential fathers) is associated with changes in fathers’ parenting between the three- and five-year surveys, net of unobserved stable characteristics and observed time-varying characteristics. By examining within-person changes, we account for the possibility that some indivi...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Analytic Strategy 
Sample 1

Related to Analytic Strategy

  • Analytics 1.1. IFS may track and analyze the usage of the IFS Offering for purposes of determining usage made of the IFS Offering, for the purposes of security, to assist customers, and for improving the Software and Services and the user experience in using such Software and Services. For example, IFS may use this information to help customers derive more value from the Software and Services, to understand and analyze trends, or to track which features are used most often in order to improve the Software and Services. IFS may share anonymous usage data with its service providers for the purpose of helping in such tracking, analysis and improvements. Additionally, IFS may share such anonymous usage data on an aggregate basis in the normal course of operating their business; for example, IFS may share information publicly to show trends about the general use of its software and services. TERMS - SERVICES

  • Strategy As an organization without operational services (fuel, maintenance, etc.), and in consideration that the majority of potential issues come from boat maintenance whereby the boats are personal property, the predominant strategy will be the minimization of on-site waste. With this approach, the organization will have minimal potential impact on the environment and reduce regulatory risk. To accomplish this, requirements will be established by policy, periodic communications shall occur, and audits will be utilized to provide feedback for improvement.

  • Supply Chain Monitoring A copy of the supply chain monitoring process, which should include details of the process for monitoring the financial viability of the supply chain (including timing), together with any known risks to supply chain stability and material changes to the supply chain. This should include extracts from Board level meetings, risk registers etc where any of the above items have been discussed. Annex 1 1 Information from Contractors who are not required to submit form AR01 to Companies House

  • Program Monitoring The Contractor will make all records and documents required under this Agreement as outlined here, in OEC Policies and NHECC Policies available to the SRO or its designee, the SR Fiscal Officer or their designee and the OEC. Scheduled monitoring visits will take place twice a year. The SRO and OEC reserve the right to make unannounced visits.

  • Selection Planning Prior to the issuance to consultants of any requests for proposals, the proposed plan for the selection of consultants under the Project shall be furnished to the Association for its review and approval, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of Appendix 1 to the Consultant Guidelines. Selection of all consultants’ services shall be undertaken in accordance with such selection plan as shall have been approved by the Association, and with the provisions of said paragraph 1.

  • Program Development NWESD agrees that priority in the development of new applications services by XXXXX shall be in accordance with the expressed direction of the XXXXX Board of Directors operating under their bylaws.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Strategic Planning Facilitate the effective alignment of IT requirements/ Information Resource Management (IRM) plans with strategic business plans and program initiatives. Management Improvements: Development and implementation of improved systems and business practices to optimize productivity and service delivery operations (e.g., analysis, and implementation of improvements in the flow of IT work and program processes and tool utilization, including business system analysis, identification of requirements for streamlining, re-engineering, or re-structuring internal systems/business processes for improvement, determination of IT solution alternatives, benchmarking).

  • Program Management 1.1.01 Implement and operate an Immunization Program as a Responsible Entity

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!