Application of the Law. This Agreement shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.
Application of the Law. Other matters upon which this insurance contract is silent shall be governed by the Insurance Act and other applicable laws and regulations of the Republic of China.
Application of the Law. [24] As seen from the 3rd Defendant’s submission, one of the arguments being put forward as to why I should revisit my order rests on the issue of there being material non-disclosure at the time the application to strike out was being heard. I agree with the Counsel for Petro Jam, that save for the Inquiry Report of the Port Authority, all the other matters stated as not being disclosed would have been evident from the Court documents filed. There would not have been an active duty on any party to draw my attention to them, unless it was peculiarly relevant to any issue that I had to decide. [25] On the other hand, the Inquiry Report, would have had to be brought to my attention, if any party intended to rely on it. From the affidavit of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, filed July 10th, 2013 filed in support of the application to vary, it seems that the parties would have been aware of this report from by at least the 3rd of June 2010. This is not a situation where the 3rd Defendant was taken by ambush by Petro Jam’s Application to Strike Out. As a matter of fact, at paragraph 10 of the affidavit of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, it was indicated that the 3rd Defendant was served with Petro Jam’s Application to strike out on the 24th June, 2013. It therefore means that if the 3rd Defendant felt that the Inquiry Report was essential to their response to the application to strike out, that ought to have been raised by them. This was not done. [26] Xxx X.X. in Xxxxxxx v SIG plc at paragraph 39 (v), which was relied upon by Petro Jam, stated: “Similarly, questions may arise as to whether the misstatement (or omission) is conscious or unconscious; and whether the facts (or arguments) were known or unknown, knowable or unknowable. These, as it seems to me, are also facts going to discretion; but where the facts or arguments are known or ought to have been known as at the time of the original order, it is unlikely that the order can be revisited and that must still be more strongly the case where the decision not to mention them is conscious or deliberate.”
Application of the Law. Without prejudice, the Service Level Agreement is a secondary law. Thus, the position the IMSHIA Act 2018 which is the primary law supersedes any position of this document INWITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto set their respective hands and seals the date and year first above written. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED by the within named SCHEME AND PROVIDER (By the IMO STATE HEALTH INSURANCE AGENCY) Name……………………………………….. (HEALTH CARE PROVIDER ) Name……………………………………….. (EXECUTIVE SECRETARY XXXXX) IN THE PRESENCE OF: (WITNESSES)
Application of the Law. 21.1. These Articles are governed by the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and in particular the Law.
Application of the Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware. Any matter not specifically covered by a provision of this Agreement shall be governed by the applicable provisions of such laws.
Application of the Law. This Law applies in the jurisdiction of the Dubai International Financial Centre.
Application of the Law. 10.1.1. The applicable law of solving any disagreements occurred under the Agreement shall be guided by the Mongolian legislations, and their official interpretations. Any issues that are not regulated by the Agreement shall be regulated by the existing legislation, rules and regulations of Mongolia.
Application of the Law
