Application Process – Assessment Phase Sample Clauses

Application Process – Assessment Phase. 3.3.1 Subject to Subsection 3.1.4, a complete Application duly submitted to NGen in accordance with this Agreement will be subjected to an independent review by the Assessors, this review being the bulk of the Assessment Phase. 3.3.2 The Assessment Phase is confidential and, except as provided for in Subsections 3.3.6 and 5.4.2, no information about the Assessment Phase will be provided to the Applicants or to any third party. 3.3.3 To ensure the independence and confidentiality of the Assessment Phase, the identity of the Assessors assigned to the Application will be kept confidential (except for NGen staff specifically and directly responsible for the Assessors), and each Assessor will be bound by written conflict of interest and confidentiality obligations at least as onerous as those set forth in this Agreement. 3.3.4 Each Assessor will independently review the Application and provide his/her assessment comments to NGen. A deliberation meeting will then be held with all the Assessors to deliberate their respective assessment results and to provide NGen with their considered recommendations as to funding of the Project. Such Assessors’ deliberation meeting will be chaired by NGen, and Representatives of NGen and the Crown may also attend the meeting with the status of observers. Other than in exceptional circumstances, the Assessors’ deliberation meeting(s) will not be recorded nor transcribed. Where recordings and/or transcriptions have been made, they are deemed to be Confidential Information under this Agreement and subject to the terms of Section 5 hereof. 3.3.5 After the Assessors’ deliberation meeting, the Chief Executive Officer of NGen will review the Assessors’ recommendations and make the Funding Decision for each application having been assessed. If he so decides, the Chief Executive Officer of NGen may request additional information and/or documents from the Applicants and cause the Application to be reassessed by Assessors prior to making the Funding Decision. 3.3.6 The Funding Decision regarding the Application will be notified to the Lead Applicant by XXxx as follows: (a) If the Funding Decision is positive, NGen will send the Lead Applicant a Funding Recommendation Notification and will provide the Lead Applicant with information and guidance regarding the Contracting Phase. NGen may simultaneously or thereafter provide the Lead Applicant with a summary of the Assessors’ comments in respect of the Application. The Funding Recommendation ...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Application Process – Assessment Phase

  • Loss Assessment We will pay up to $1000 for your share of loss assessment charged during the policy period against you by a corporation or as- sociation of property owners, when the assess- ment is made as a result of:

  • Application Process The employees wishing to enter into a job share arrangement will apply in writing to the Employer and forward a copy to the Union outlining the proposed commencement date of the job share, how the hours and days of work will be shared and how communication and continuity of work will be maintained. The Employer shall communicate a decision on a job share request in writing to the applicants. Applications to Job Sharing shall not be unreasonably denied.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment and Prior Consultation Processor shall provide reasonable assistance to the Company with any data protection impact assessments, and prior consultations with Supervising Authorities or other competent data privacy authorities, which Company reasonably considers to be required by article 35 or 36 of the GDPR or equivalent provisions of any other Data Protection Law, in each case solely in relation to Processing of Company Personal Data by, and taking into account the nature of the Processing and information available to, the Contracted Processors.

  • Application Procedure 7.4.1. Application Priority........................................ 7.4.2. [Reserved].................................................. 7.4.3. Advance Payments............................................

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.

  • Needs Assessment The determination of whether the Annual Income of a family or individual occupying or seeking to occupy a Qualifying Unit complies with the requirements for Extremely Low-Income Households or Low- to Moderate-Income Households shall be made by the applicable housing authority in the CDBG-DR Program area prior to admission of such family or individual to occupancy of a Qualifying Unit.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment If, pursuant to Data Protection Law, Customer (or its Controllers) are required to perform a data protection impact assessment or prior consultation with a regulator, at Customer’s request, SAP will provide such documents as are generally available for the Cloud Service (for example, this DPA, the Agreement, audit reports or certifications). Any additional assistance shall be mutually agreed between the Parties.

  • Escalation Process If Customer believes in good faith that Customer has not received quality or timely assistance in response to a support request or that Customer urgently need to communicate important support related business issues to Service Provider’s management, Customer may escalate the support request by contacting Service Provider and requesting that the support request be escalated to work with Customer to develop an action plan.

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013). 6.3.2 Teachers shall use their professional judgment to determine which assessment and/or evaluation tool(s) from the Board list of preapproved assessment tools is applicable, for which student(s), as well as the frequency and timing of the tool. In order to inform their instruction, teachers must utilize diagnostic assessment during the school year.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!