Assessment of CBA Sample Clauses

Assessment of CBA. The basis of concerned NRAs assessment of CBA The concerned NRAs have assessed the CBA while taking particular note on the ACER Recommendation. In order to be basis for proper cross-border allocation decision, the CBA needs to be comprehensive and comprehensible, and use comparable and monetised information on costs and benefits and other cross-border monetary flows, disaggregated per country. The project-specific CBA submitted by the project promoters need to comply with principles laid down in Annex V of Regulation No 347/2013 and be consistent with the rules and indicators set out in its Annex IV. In additions, the Agency recommends that the project-specific CBA should comprise the following:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Assessment of CBA. The concerned NRAs find that the CBA demonstrates for the most part the above-mentioned expectations to be considered as basis for proper cross-border allocation decision. The concerned NRAs recognise that as the Finland’s internal line enables the increase of cross- border capacity but does not increase the cross-border capacity alone, the benefits of the project cluster must be evaluated as an entity. The country-specific CBA results provided in the investment request are based on the scenarios prepared by the project promoters in the cross-border capacity study. As the cross-border capacity study was conducted during 2016, study’s scenarios are based on the TYNDP2016 scenarios but there are deviations in the scenario building, modelling specifics and input used. The simulation results in the cross-border study show higher socio-economic welfare benefits than presented in the TYNDP2016. Nevertheless, the concerned NRAs finds that the specifics and more comprehensive dataset used in the modelling is rationalized and likely to lead to more accurate welfare assessment. In addition, the benefits of the project cluster have been modelled in TYNDP2018. As the aggregated results obtained from TYNDP2018 indicates notable SEW benefits and are in the same scope as the results presented by the project promoters, the concerned NRAs agree that the results from the cross-border capacity study are plausible. The concerned NRAs find that the recommended standardised social discount rate, investment lifetime and residual value is used by the project promoters in the CBA.
Sample 1
Assessment of CBA. The basis of concerned NRAs’ assessment of CBA The concerned NRAs have assessed the project-specific CBA while taking particular note on the ACER Recommendation. In order to be basis for proper cross-border allocation decision, the CBA needs to be comprehensive and comprehensible, and use comparable and monetised information on costs and benefits and other cross-border monetary flows, disaggregated per country. It is of utmost importance that input, assumptions etc. used to derive the CBA of a project for different purposes (i.e. TYNDP, PCI selection, TSO consultation, investment request) are identical unless there exists a reasoned justification. The project-specific CBA (submitted by the project promoters to TSOs during the TSO consultation, as well as submitted to NRAs as part of an investment request) needs to comply with principles laid down in Annex V of Regulation No 347/2013 and be consistent with the rules and indicators set out in its Annex IV. In addition, the Agency recommends that the project-specific CBA should comprise the following:
Sample 1

Related to Assessment of CBA

  • Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Development of a transportation project must comply with applicable environmental laws. The party named in article 1, Responsible Parties, under AGREEMENT is responsible for the following:

  • ASSESSMENT REPORT Within 120 days following the general election held on November 2nd 2003, the returning officer of the munici- pality shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and referendums in munici- palities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Minister setting out relevant ways to improve the trial and addressing, in particular, the following points : — the preparations for the election (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the advance poll and the poll ; — the cost of using the electronic voting system : – the cost of adapting election procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; – a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and the projected cost of holding the general election on November 2nd 2003 using traditional methods ; — the number and duration of incidents during which voting was stopped, if any ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting ; — the results obtained during the addition of the votes and the correspondence between the number of ballot paper cards issued to the deputy returning officers and the number of ballot paper cards returned used and unused ; — the examination of rejected ballot papers, if it has been completed.

  • Environmental Assessment Buyer shall have the right for a period commencing upon execution of this Agreement by both parties and ending on November 28, 2012, to conduct an environmental assessment of the Assets, at Buyer’s sole risk, liability and expense. Seller shall make available to Buyer, during the environmental assessment period described above, Seller’s historical files regarding prior operations on the Assets, and provide Buyer and its representatives with reasonable access to the Assets to conduct the environmental assessment. Buyer shall provide Seller three (3) days prior written notice of a desired date(s) for such assessment and Seller shall have the right to be present during any assessment and, if any testing is conducted pursuant to Seller’s express prior written consent, Seller may require splitting of all samples. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, Buyer shall not have the right to drill any test, monitor or other xxxxx or to extract samples of any air, soil, water or other substance from the Assets without Seller’s express prior written consent. If Buyer proposes a reasonable request to drill a test well or extract a sample pursuant to a systematic and customary procedure for the assessment of the environmental condition of the Assets and Seller refuses to grant its consent to such a well or sampling, then Buyer shall have the right, for a period of seventy-two (72) hours following notification of Seller’s refusal to consent, to deliver written notice to Seller of Buyer’s election to exclude from this transaction the portion of the Assets affected by such proposed test well or sample, and the Purchase Price shall be adjusted accordingly by the Allocated Value of such portion of the Assets so excluded. Under no circumstances whatsoever shall Seller ever be obligated to grant its consent to any such test xxxxx or sampling proposed by Buyer, and Buyer’s sole and exclusive remedy for any refusal by Seller to grant its consent shall be the limited right contained in the preceding sentence to exclude the affected Assets from the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. If Buyer fails to exercise the right to exclude such Assets by written notice to Seller delivered prior to the expiration of the seventy-two hour period described above, then Buyer shall be conclusively deemed to have waived such right and shall be obligated to purchase the affected Assets without conducting such testing or sampling or any adjustment of the Purchase Price unless otherwise provided in this Agreement.

  • Assessment Center A promotional candidate may not appeal or dispute the Assessment Center or scoring of the Assessment Center to an administrative or judicial body except for fraud committed by an assessor.

  • Assessment and updates 12.1 Various opportunities are provided to keep you up to date with your child’s progress. You will receive two comprehensive written reports each year and arrangements will be made for at least one interview where you can discuss your child’s development with their teacher. In addition, you can always contact the School to arrange a meeting if you have any concerns or wish to receive an update on progress.

  • Self-Assessment (a) Subject to clause 4.4(b), for Services that are Self-Assessable:

  • Loss Assessment We will pay up to $1000 for your share of loss assessment charged during the policy period against you by a corporation or as- sociation of property owners, when the assess- ment is made as a result of:

  • Assessment 29) The Secretary of State will notify the appropriate body for assessment purposes about the Academy.

  • Needs Assessment 1. The Contractor shall conduct a cultural and linguistic group-needs assessment of the eligible client population in the Contractor’s service area to assess the language needs of the population and determine what reasonable steps are necessary to ensure meaningful access to services and activities to eligible individuals. [22 CCR 98310, 98314] The group-needs assessment shall take into account the following four (4) factors:

  • Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - Transfer Agent shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats occurring and the impact of those threats upon the Transfer Agent organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.