At-Risk DSRIP Funding Sample Clauses

At-Risk DSRIP Funding. A portion of the State’s DSRIP expenditure authority will be at-risk. If MassHealth’s DSRIP expenditure authority is reduced based on an Accountability Score that is less than 100%, then MassHealth will reduce DSRIP payments in proportion to the reduced expenditure authority to ensure sufficient state funding to support the program. This mechanism ensures that all recipients of MassHealth DSRIP funding are accountable to the State achieving its performance commitments. The portion of the State’s DSRIP expenditure authority that is at-risk will follow the same at-risk Budget Period structure as for the ACOs. The Budget Period is January 1 through December 31. The 6-month Preparation Budget Period funds will be equal to half of the State’s allocated DSRIP Year 1 funds. Budget Period 1 funds will be equal to the sum of half of the State’s allocated DSRIP Year 1 funds, and half of DSRIP Year 2 funds. Budget Periods 2 through 4 will be sourced by the same funding pattern as Budget Period 1. Budget Period 5 funds will be equal to half of the State’s allocated DSRIP Year 5 funds. In the Preparation Budget Period and Budget Period 1, 0% of funds will be at-risk. However, in Budget Periods 2 through 5, the portion of at-risk expenditure authority follows the table below: DSRIP Budget Period Prep BP and BP 1 July 1, 2017 – December 31, 2018 BP 2 January 1, 2019- December 31, 2019 BP 3 January 1, 2020- December 2020 BP 4 January 1, 2021- December 31, 2021 BP 5 January 1, 2022- December 31, 2022 DSRIP Expenditure Authority $637.5M $412.5M $362.5M $275M $112.5M % of Expenditure Authority At- Risk 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Actual Expenditure Authority At- Risk $0M $20.625M $36.25M $41.25M $22.5M State DSRIP Accountability Score: The State will calculate the State’s DSRIP Accountability Score. See DSRIP Protocol Section 5.2. The State DSRIP Accountability will be based on performance in the following domains: MassHealth ACO/APM Adoption Rate Reduction in State Spending Growth ACO Quality and Utilization Performance Each domain will be assigned a domain weight for each performance year, such that the sum of the domain weights is 100% each year. State performance in each domain will be multiplied by the associated weight, and then summed together to create an aggregate score, namely the State’s DSRIP Accountability Score. The State will report its Accountability Score to CMS once it is available, and the score will then be used by the State and CMS to determine whether the State’s...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
At-Risk DSRIP Funding. A portion of DSRIP ACO startup/ongoing funds and glide path funding will be at-risk. An ACO’s DSRIP Accountability Score will determine the amount of at-risk funding that is earned (STC 69).
Sample 1Sample 2
At-Risk DSRIP Funding. A portion of DSRIP Community Partners funding will be at-risk. A CP’s DSRIP Accountability Score will determine the amount of at- risk funding that is earned (see DSRIP Protocol Section 5.4)).
Sample 1Sample 2
At-Risk DSRIP Funding. A portion of the State’s DSRIP expenditure authority will be at-risk. If MassHealth’s DSRIP expenditure authority is reduced based on an Accountability Score that is less than 100%, then MassHealth will reduce DSRIP payments in proportion to the reduced expenditure authority to ensure sufficient state funding to support the program. This mechanism ensures that all recipients of MassHealth DSRIP funding are accountable to the State achieving its performance commitments.
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to At-Risk DSRIP Funding

  • Program Funding Upon entry into force of this Compact, MCC will grant to the Government, under the terms of this Compact, an amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eight Million Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand United States Dollars (US$408,850,000) to support the Program (“Program Funding”). The allocation of Program Funding is generally described in Annex II to this Compact.

  • Formula Funding Funding equivalent to the level of funding which would be provided through the funding formula of the LA to a maintained school which had all of that Academy's relevant characteristics, including its number of pupils;

  • Per-pupil Funding The School's non-facility general fund per-pupil funding shall be as defined in Sec. 302D-28, HRS. The Commission shall distribute the School's per-pupil allocation each fiscal year pursuant to Sec. 302D-28(f), HRS, and shall provide the School with the calculations used to determine the per-pupil amount each year. All funds distributed to the School from the Commission shall be used solely for the School's educational purposes as appropriated by the Legislature, and the School shall have discretion to determine how such funding shall be allocated at the school level to serve those purposes subject to applicable laws and this Contract.

  • Loss of Funding Performance by University under this Agreement may be dependent upon the appropriation and allotment of funds by the Texas State Legislature (Legislature) and/or allocation of funds by the Board of Regents of The University of Texas System (Board). If Legislature fails to appropriate or allot necessary funds, or Board fails to allocate necessary funds, then University will issue written notice to Contractor and University may terminate this Agreement without further duty or obligation. Contractor acknowledges that appropriation, allotment, and allocation of funds are beyond University’s control.

  • Fiscal Funding Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, the parties hereto agree that the charges hereunder are payable to the Contractor by the District solely from appropriations received by District. In the event such appropriations are determined by the Chief Financial Officer/Comptroller of the District to no longer exist or to be insufficient with respect to the charges payable hereunder, this Agreement shall immediately terminate without further obligation to the District upon notice that such appropriations no longer exist and are insufficient. If this Agreement is so terminated, then the District shall only pay Contractor for goods and/or services provided by Contractor and accepted by the District up to, through, and including the date of termination. Following the termination of this Agreement under this Section, the parties’ duties to one another shall cease except for those obligations that shall survive the termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the District’s payment obligations for goods and/or services accepted by the District before the date of termination, and the Contractor’s duties to insure and/or indemnify the District and to cooperate with any audit. Termination of this Agreement pursuant to this Section shall not limit either of the parties’ remedies for any breach of this Agreement.

  • Other Funding It may be appropriate for funding to be provided to the awardee by other organizations, including Federal agencies in support of their missions or in support of mission-related staff research. It is also recognized that it may be appropriate for personnel or facilities to be used for other NSF and non-NSF projects that are deemed consistent with the scope of the federal award. Such activities, however, must be coordinated in advance with NSF and not impact negatively on NSF sponsored activities to be performed under the award. Accordingly:

  • Lack of Funding The Parties recognize that the compensation provided for in this Grant Contract depends on budget approval and appropriations of sufficient grant funds by the Lancaster County Board of County Commissioners (“Grant Funds”). The Parties further recognize that the Sponsor may terminate this Grant Contract in whole or in part immediately upon written notice to Grantee if grant funds do not receive sufficient budget approval or appropriations. The date Project Monitor sends the written notice of termination shall be the date of termination. The Grantee understands and agrees that the Sponsor shall not provide for funding under this Grant Contract from the Lancaster County General Fund, tax revenue, or any other source, and that the sole source of funding for this Grant Contract shall be approved and appropriated Grant Funds. In the event that Grant Funds do not receive sufficient budget approval or appropriations, the Grantee shall be compensated pursuant to the terms of this Grant Contract for authorized Project Account costs charged against the Project Account prior to the date of termination according to the approved Project Budget. Xxxxxxx agrees that Xxxxxxx has no reasonable expectation of payment for unauthorized costs, or for payment of any kind from any other source. The Grantee further understands and agrees that any costs not covered by the current Grant Contract are not authorized.

  • State Interest Liabilities 8.6.1 The State shall be liable for interest on Federal funds from the date Federal funds are credited to a State account until the date those funds are paid out for program purposes.

  • Payment of Funding 5.1 Payments will be made after written request to FFG in accordance with the following payment plan: 1st instalment after conclusion of the Funding Agreement EUR xx 2nd instalment after the end of the reporting period xx.xx.20xx EUR xx 3rd instalment after the end of the reporting period xx.xx.20xx EUR xx 4th instalment after the end of the reporting period xx.xx.20xx EUR xx Final instalment after final approval by FFG EUR xx

  • Funding This Contract is subject to termination or cancellation, without penalty to System Agency, either in whole or in part, subject to the availability of state funds. System Agency is a state agency whose authority and appropriations are subject to actions of the Texas Legislature. If System Agency becomes subject to a legislative change, revocation of statutory authority, or lack of appropriated funds that would render either System Agency’s or Grantee’s delivery or performance under the Contract impossible or unnecessary, the Contract will be terminated or cancelled and be deemed null and void. In the event of a termination or cancellation under this Section, System Agency will not be liable to Grantee for any damages, that are caused or associated with such termination, or cancellation, and System Agency will not be required to give prior notice.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.