Common use of Authorization Regarding Sub Processors Clause in Contracts

Authorization Regarding Sub Processors. 5.1.1 Securiti’s current list of Sub-processors is hereby enclosed at Schedule 2 to the DPA. Such Sub-processor list shall include the identities and details of those Sub-processors and their country of location (“Sub-processor List”). The Sub-processor List as of the date of execution of this DPA, or as of the date of publication (as applicable), is hereby, or shall be (as applicable), authorized by Client. In any event, the Sub-processor List shall be deemed authorized by Client unless it provides a written reasonable objection for reasons related to the GDPR within ten (10) business days following the publication of the Sub-processor List. Client may reasonably object for reasons related to the GDPR to Securiti’s use of an existing Sub-processor by providing a written objection to xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xx. In the event Client reasonably objects to an existing Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentences, and the parties do not find a solution in good faith to the issue in question, then Client may, as a sole remedy, terminate the applicable Agreement and this DPA with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Securiti without the use of the objected-to Sub-processor by providing written notice to Securiti provided that all amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date with respect to the Processing at issue shall be duly paid to Securiti. Client will have no further claims against Securiti due to (i) past use of approved Sub-processors prior to the date of objection or (ii) the termination of the Agreement (including, without limitation, requesting refunds) and the DPA in the situation described in this paragraph.