Objection Right for New Sub Sample Clauses

Objection Right for New Sub processors. Customer may reasonably object to Data Processor’s use of a new Sub-processor, for reasons relating to the protection of Personal Data, by notifying Data Processor promptly in writing within three (3) business days after receipt of Data Processor’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2.2 and such written objection shall include the reasons, relating to the protection of Personal Data, for objecting to Data Processor’s use of such new Sub-processor. Failure to object to such new Sub-processor in writing within three (3) business days following Data Processor’s notice shall be deemed as acceptance of the new Sub-Processor. In the event Customer r eas o n ab l y objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentences, Data Processor will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Customer. If Data Processor is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Customer may, as a sole remedy, terminate the applicable Agreement an d this DP A with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Data Processor without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Data Processor provided that all amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date with respect to the Processing at issue shall be duly paid to Data Processor. Until a decision is made regarding the new Sub-processor, Data Processor may temporarily suspend the Processing of the affected Personal Data and/or suspend access to the Account. Customer will have no further claims against Data Processor due to the termination of the Agreement (including, without limitation, requesting refunds) and/or the DPA in the situation described in this paragraph.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Objection Right for New Sub processors. Customer may object to Supplier’s use of a new Sub-processor by notifying Supplier promptly in writing within thirty (30) days of receipt of Supplier’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in section 5.2. If Customer objects to a new Sub-processor as permitted in the preceding sentence, Supplier will: (i) use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services; (ii) or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening Customer; 0r
Objection Right for New Sub processors. Customer may object to ClickDimensions’ use of a new Sub-processor by notifying ClickDimensions promptly in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of ClickDimensions’ notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, ClickDimensions will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Customer. If ClickDimensions is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Customer’s sole remedy is to terminate the applicable Order Form(s) with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by ClickDimensions without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to ClickDimensions.
Objection Right for New Sub processors. To the extent required under Data Protection Laws and Regulations, Customer may object to Enverus’s use of a new Sub-processor by notifying Enverus promptly in writing within thirty (30) days of receipt of Enverus’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in section 5.3. If Customer objects to a new Sub-processor as permitted in the preceding sentence, Enverus will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Enverus is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed sixty (60) days, Customer may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Enverus without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Enverus. Enverus will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Order Form(s) following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
Objection Right for New Sub processors. Customer may reasonably object to Aha!’s use of a new Sub- processor (e.g., making Personal Data available to the specific Sub-processor may violate applicable Data Protection Laws and Regulations) by notifying Aha! promptly in writing within ten (10) days after receipt of Aha!’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 4.2. Such notice from Customer shall explain the reasonable grounds for the objection. Upon receipt of such notice, Aha! will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Service or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Service to avoid processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Aha! is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed sixty (60) days, Customer may terminate the Account with respect only to that Service which cannot be provided by Aha! without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Aha! Upon such termination, Aha! will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the Subscription Term following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Service, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
Objection Right for New Sub processors. Customer may reasonably object to RSSBUS’ use of a new Sub- processor (e.g., if making Personal Data available to the Sub-processor may violate applicable Data Protection Law or decrease protections for such Personal Data) by notifying RSSBUS promptly in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of RSSBUS’ notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2. Such notice shall explain the reasonable grounds for the objection. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor, and that objection is not unreasonable, RSSBUS will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Customer. If RSSBUS is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, either party may terminate the applicable Order(s) with respect only to those aspects of the Services which cannot be provided by RSSBUS without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to RSSBUS. RSSBUS will refund Customer any prepaid fees on a prorated basis of such Order(s) following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
Objection Right for New Sub processors. XXX may object to Sumo Apps’s use of a new Sub- processor by notifying Sumo Apps promptly in writing within thirty (30) days after receipt of Sumo Apps’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.3. In the event LEA objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, Sumo Apps will use reasonable efforts to make available to LEA a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to LEA’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub processor without unreasonably burdening LEA. If Sumo Apps is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, LEA may terminate the Agreement with respect to only to those Services which cannot be provided by Sumo Apps without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Sumo Apps. Sumo Apps will refund LEA any prepaid fees (if applicable) covering the remainder of the term of such Agreement following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on LEA.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Objection Right for New Sub processors. Customer may object to ClickDimensions’ use of a new Sub-processor by notifying ClickDimensions promptly in writing within ten
Objection Right for New Sub processors. Customer, in order to exercise its right to object to Supplier’s use of a new Sub-processor, whether Affiliate or not, shall notify the Supplier promptly in writing within thirty (30) days after the change. Personal Data shall by no means be processed by the Sub-processor against which the Customer has explicitly objected. If Supplier and Customer cannot find a mutually agreeable resolution to address the Customer’s objection within a reasonable time period, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, the Customer may terminate the Services. The Supplier shall refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the Service following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Service. Customer shall return at Customer’s own delivery expenses any hardware (i.e. YODECK player) acquired by Flipnode. Contractual relationships. Flipnode shall only engage and disclose Personal Data to non-Affiliate Sub- processors that are parties to written agreements with Flipnode containing data protection obligations no less protective that the obligations of this DPA and comply with any requirements for such processing in the Data Protection Laws and Regulations. Flipnode agrees and warrants, upon request of the Customer, to send promptly a copy of any Sub-processor contract to the Customer, and to make available to the Data Subject upon request a copy of the DPA, or any existing Sub-processing contract, unless the DPA or contract contain commercial information, in which case it may remove such commercial information, with the exception of Attachment 2, which shall be replaced by a summary description of the security measures, in those cases where the Data Subject is unable to obtain a copy from the Customer.
Objection Right for New Sub processors. Customer may object to SFDC’s use of a new Sub-processor by notifying SFDC promptly in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of SFDC’s notice made in accordance with Section 5.2. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor for the Covered Services, as permitted in the preceding sentence, Customer’s sole remedy is to terminate the Pilot Agreement and cease use of the Covered Services.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.