Objection Right. Customer may reasonably object to Contentsquare’s use of a new Sub-processor, for reasons relating to the protection of Personal Data intended to be Processed by such Sub-processor, by providing a written notice to Contentsquare at xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx, listing all specific legitimate gaps allegedly preventing the use of such Sub-processor by Contentsquare, within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of Contentsquare’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2 above. Failure to object to such new Sub-processor in writing within such time period shall be deemed as acceptance of the new Sub-Processor by Customer. In the event Customer reasonably objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentences, Contentsquare shall have the right to cure the objection through one of the following options (to be selected at Contentsquare’s sole discretion): (i) Contentsquare shall cease to use the Sub-processor with regard to Customer Personal Data;
Objection Right. Customers may reasonably object in writing for appointment of a new Sub-processor if the new Sub-processor is proven to represent a substantial and unreasonable risk to the protection of Customer’s Personal Data, subject to the termination and liability clauses of the Agreement. An objection for a new Sub-processor shall be sent to xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx within ten (10) business days after notification thereon. Customer acknowledges that appointment of Sub-processors is essential for the provision of the Services and the objection for a new Sub-processor may prevent Lokalise from offering the Services to Customers.
Objection Right. If Customer objects to Riverbed’s use of a new Subprocessor (including when, where applicable, exercising its right to object under clause 9(a) of the Standard Contractual Clauses), it will provide Riverbed with: (i) written notice of the objection within 30 days after Riverbed has provided notice to Customer as described in Section 5(b) above; and (ii) documentary evidence that reasonably shows that the new Subprocessor does not or cannot comply with the requirements in this DPA (an “Objection”). If Customer does not provide Riverbed with a notice of Objection within this 30 day period, Customer is deemed to have accepted the new Subprocessor. In the event of an Objection, Riverbed will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Customer Personal Data by the objected-to new Subprocessor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Riverbed is unable to make available such change within a reasonable time period, which will not exceed 30 days, Customer may terminate the applicable Agreement with respect to only those Services which cannot be provided by Riverbed without the use of the objected-to new Subprocessor by providing not less than 30 days’ written notice to Riverbed. This termination right is Customer’s sole and exclusive remedy if Customer objects to any new Subprocessor.
Objection Right. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 9, as Regulatory Approval holder, BioNTech shall have the right to object to and oppose any intended action of Pfizer as Lead Development Party if BioNTech reasonably believes Pfizer’s intended action to be contrary to applicable Law.
Objection Right. Customer may reasonably object to Contentsquare’s use of a new Sub-processor, for reasons relating to the protection of Personal Data intended to be Processed by such Sub-processor, by providing a written notice to Contentsquare at xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx, listing all specific legitimate gaps allegedly preventing the use of such Sub-processor by Contentsquare, within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of Contentsquare’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2 above. Failure to object to such new Sub-processor in writing within such time period shall be deemed as acceptance of the new Sub-Processor by Customer. In the event Customer reasonably objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentences, Contentsquare shall have the right to cure the objection through one of the following options (to be selected at Contentsquare’s sole discretion): (i) Contentsquare shall cease to use the Sub-processor with regard to Customer Personal Data; (ii) Sub-processor shall take the corrective steps curing the gaps listed by Customer in its objection (which steps will be deemed to resolve Customer’s objection) and proceed to use the Sub- processor to process Customer Personal Data; or (iii) Contentsquare may cease to provide, temporarily or permanently, the particular aspect of a Contentsquare Service that would involve use of the subcontractor to process Customer Personal Data (“Objection Remediations”). If Contentsquare is unable to implement any of the above Objection Remediations within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of objection notice, Customer may, as a sole remedy, terminate the applicable Agreement and this DPA with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Contentsquare without the use of the objected-to Sub-processor. All amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date with respect to the Processing at issue shall be duly paid to Contentsquare. Until a decision is made regarding the new Sub-processor, Contentsquare may temporarily suspend the Processing of the affected Personal Data and/or suspend access to the Account. Customer will have no further claims against Contentsquare due to the use of approved Sub-processors in accordance with the terms of this Section 5 or termination or suspension of any part of the Contentsquare Service in accordance with the terms of this Section 5 or the termination of the Agreement (including, without limitation, requesting refunds) and/or the DPA...
Objection Right. Customers have the right to raise objections to KrispCall's selection or replacement of a sub- processor, provided such objections are made in writing and are based on valid data protection concerns. In such a situation, the Customer and KrispCall will engage in good-faith discussions to explore reasonable alternative solutions. If no resolution is reached within 15 days from the date of the Customer's written objection, the Customer may discontinue the use of the affected KrispCall services by providing written notice to KrispCall. Such discontinuation will not affect any fees incurred by the Customer before the discontinuation of the affected services. If no objections are raised prior to KrispCall replacing or appointing a new sub-processor, the Customer will be considered to have authorized the new sub-processor.
Objection Right. Client may reasonably object to Xxxxxx XxXxxxxx’x use of a new Sub-Processor by notifying Xxxxxx XxXxxxxx in writing within 30 days after receipt of a notice of a new appointment. Xxxxxx XxXxxxxx will use commercially reasonable efforts to make available to Client a change in Add-On Services that is satisfactory to the Client. If Xxxxxx XxXxxxxx is unable to facilitate such change, the Client may terminate the T&C with 30 days written notice.
Objection Right. Customer may object to the use of a new Sub-Processor on a reasonable and legitimate basis. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-Processor, Customer shall provide written notice to xxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx within the 7 calendar day notice period set out in Section [6.3] outlining Customer’s specific concerns about the new Sub-Processor in order to give Bynder the opportunity to address such concerns. Bynder may, at its sole discretion, (i) not appoint the Sub-Processor and/or propose an alternate Sub-Processor; (ii) take the steps to address the Customer’s specific concerns and obtain Customer’s written consent to use the Sub-Processor; or (iii) make available to Customer the Bynder Product(s) without the particular aspect that would involve use of the objected-to Sub-processor. If Bynder is unable or determines in its reasonable judgement, that it is commercially unreasonable to do any of the options in Section 6.4 (i)-(iii), Customer may terminate the Agreement in accordance with section 19.3 of the Terms.
Objection Right. Each managing director has the right to object to the execution of measures by any other managing director in the other managing director’s business unit. Such measures must be suspended until all managing directors have jointly decided on the dispute, as the case may be by calling in the superior.
Objection Right. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 8, where a Party is the MA Holder, it shall have the right to object to or oppose any intended action of the other Party if such objecting Party reasonably and in good faith believes the other Party’s intended action is contrary to applicable Law and carries a material risk that if such action is taken, it will result in a material negative impact on approvability of a Market Authorization Application or continued approval of a Marketing Authorization Approval for the Product or sanctions or fines from the relevant Governmental Authority. In case of an objection or opposition by the MA Holder pursuant to the preceding sentence, the Parties shall promptly discuss the relevant issue in good faith and the objected or opposed intended action shall not be initiated or shall be put on hold until the Parties have reached an agreement on how to ensure compliance with applicable law.
