Objection Right for Sub-processors. To the extent required under Data Protection Laws, Wiz shall notify Customer of any intended changes concerning the addition or replacement of other Sub-processor(s) thereby giving Customer the opportunity to object. Notification may be provided by updating the Sub-processor page in Services and/or the Sub-Processor List. Customer may reasonably object to Wiz’s use of a Sub-processor for reasons related to the Data Protection Laws by notifying Wiz in writing within ten (10) days after receipt of Wiz’s notice including the reasons for objecting to Wiz’s use of such Sub- processor. Failure to object to such Sub-Processor in writing within ten (10) days following Wiz’s notice shall be deemed as acceptance of the Sub-Processor. In the event Customer reasonably objects to a Sub-processor, Wiz will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services to avoid Processing of Customer Personal Data by the objected-to Sub- processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Wiz is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Customer may, as a sole remedy, terminate the Agreement and this DPA by providing written notice to Wiz provided that all amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date shall be duly paid to Wiz. Until a decision is made regarding the Sub-processor, Wiz may temporarily suspend the Processing of the affected Customer Personal Data. Customer will have no further claims against Wiz due to the termination of the Agreement and/or the DPA in the situation described in this clause.
Objection Right for Sub-processors. Client may object to Anacle’s use of a Sub-processor by notifying Anacle in writing. If Client objects to a Sub-processor as permitted in the preceding sentence, Anacle will use reasonable efforts to make available to Client a change in the SaaS Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Client’s configuration or use of the SaaS Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to Sub- processor without unreasonably burdening Client. If Anacle is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed sixty (60) days, Client may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) with respect only to those SaaS Services which cannot be provided by Anacle without the use of the objected-to Sub-processor by providing written notice to Anacle. Anacle will refund Client any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Order Form(s) following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated SaaS Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Client.
Objection Right for Sub-processors. Customer may object to ODASEVA’s use of a new Sub processor by notifying ODASEVA promptly in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of ODASEVA’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2 (“ Information Regarding Current and/or New Sub-processors”). In the event Customer objects to a new Sub- processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, ODASEVA will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Customer. If ODASEVA is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Customer may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by ODASEVA without the use of the objected-to new Sub- processor by providing written notice to ODASEVA. ODASEVA will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Order Form(s) following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
Objection Right for Sub-processors. Customer may reasonably object to Strigo's use of a certain Sub-processor (e.g., if making Personal Data available to the Sub-processor may violate applicable Data Protection Law or weaken the protections for such Personal Data) by notifying Strigo promptly in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of Strigo's notice in connection therewith. Such notice shall explain the reasonable grounds for the objection. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, Strigo will use commercially reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer's configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Strigo is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, either party may terminate without penalty the applicable Order Form(s) with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Strigo without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Strigo. Strigo will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Order Form(s) following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
Objection Right for Sub-processors. Client may reasonably object to Dazz’s use of alternative Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Dazz promptly in writing within three
