Bosnia and Herzegovina. Declaration On Xxxxxx Xx Xxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Declaration On Behalf Of The Republika Srpska
Bosnia and Herzegovina. Declaration On Behalf Of The Federation Of Bosnia And Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina. 6.1.1 Present situation
Bosnia and Herzegovina. Botswana ............................................................Brazil ...................................................................Brunei ..................................................................Bulgaria ...............................................................
Bosnia and Herzegovina. Declaration On Xxxxxx Xx Xxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Declaration On Behalf Of The Republika Srpska I paesi, Bosnia-Erzegovina, documenti: gli accordi di Dayton, indice I paesi, Bosnia-Erzegovina, documenti: gli accordi di Dayton ANNEX 5 Agreement on Arbitration
Bosnia and Herzegovina. GCC 1.1 (e) (iii) The Project Sites are: as specified in the attached Implementation Schedule. GCC 1.1 (e) (x) The Contract shall continue in force until the Electronic Health Record Software and all the Services have been provided unless the Contract is terminated earlier in accordance with the terms set out in the Contract. GCC 1.1. (e) (xii) The Post-Warranty Services Period is four (4) years following the expiration of the Warranty period during which the Supplier may be obligated to provide maintenance and/or technical support services for the Software, and in accordance with any amendments to the legislation within the Post-Warranty Services Period the bidder must modify the software solutions as requested, under separate contract(s).
Bosnia and Herzegovina. General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina (The Dayton Agreement), 21 November 1995
Bosnia and Herzegovina. On 14th June 2007 a meeting concerning the final phase of the Pro- gramme drafting was held in Sarajevo. The meeting concerned the «approach question», namely – «integrated» versus «transitional» approach.
Bosnia and Herzegovina. The IPA Component II Co–ordinator (within the meaning of Art.
32.1 of the IPA Implementing Regulation) is the Assistant Director for Coordination of EU Assistance in the Directorate for European Integration (DEI). DEI is the main coordinative body for all EU inte- gration issues, including coordination of EU assistance programmes (NIPAC) and as there is no line ministry responsible for manage- ment and implementation of the Component II of IPA yet, DEI is carrying out this task as well.
Bosnia and Herzegovina. The case of Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxxx and the political party “Party for Bosnia and Herzegovina”31, hereinafter referred to as Pilav v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, is the first of the two legal proceedings which will be presented in this work. As stated before, both of these cases are dealing with issues of human rights, more specifically the area of political rights – the right to vote and the right to public participation in government affairs.32 After the Bosnian war, Xx. Xxxxx actively participated in the social and the political life of his community in the city of Srebrenica, entity of Republika Srpska. He was elected and held several political offices, including the seat in the Council of Peoples in the Parliament of Republika Srpska. In 2006 Pilav announced his candidacy for the member of the Presidency of Bosnia and 31 Originally “Stranka za Bosnu i Hercegovinu”, trans. mine; 32 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21; Herzegovina33 on general elections which were to be held in October the same year. Therefore, he submitted his application to the Central Election Commission of Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, this institution refused his candidacy, firstly on July 24 (decision number 01-07-1-913- 103-1/06) and then on August 1, after he appealed to the previous decision (decision number 01- 02-2-1581/06). Consequently, he submitted an appeal to a higher instance, in this case, to the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. With this request he was questioning the Electoral Commission’s ruling. On August 00 xxx Xxxxx xx Xxxxxx xxx Xxxxxxxxxxx confirmed that the Commission’s decision adhered to the current legal framework. Ergo, his next step was to complain to the highest, and last possible instance, the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Xx. Xxxxx made an appeal against the decisions of both the Central Election Commission and the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in front of the Constitutional Court of the country.
