Conhecimento da Lingua O Contratado, pelo presente instrumento, declara expressamente que tem pleno conhecimento da língua inglesa e que leu, compreendeu e livremente aceitou e concordou com os termos e condições estabelecidas no Plano e no Acordo de Atribuição (“Agreement” xx xxxxxx).
Consentement Relatif à la Langue Utilisée Les parties reconnaissent avoir exigé que cette convention («Agreement») soit rédigée en anglais, ainsi que tous les documents, avis et procédures judiciaires, éxécutés, donnés ou intentés en vertu de, ou liés directement ou indirectement à la présente.
Argentina Caja de Valores S A. Australia Austraclear Limited Reserve Bank Information and Transfer System Austria Öesterreichische Kontrollbank AG (Wertpapiersammelbank Division) Belgium Caisse Interprofessionnelle de Dépôt et de Virement de Titres S.A. Banque Nationale de Belgique Brazil Companhia Brasileira de Liquidaçao e Custodia (CBLC) Bolsa de Valores de Rio de Janeiro All SSB clients presently use CBLC Central de Custodia e de Liquidação Financeira de Titulos Bulgaria Central Depository AD Bulgarian National Bank Canada The Canadian Depository for Securities Limited People’s Republic Shanghai Securities Central Clearing and of China Registration Corporation Shenzhen Securities Central Clearing Co., Ltd. Costa Rica Central de Valores S.A. (CEVAL) Croatia Ministry of Finance National Bank of Croatia Czech Republic Stredisko cenných papírů Czech National Bank Denmark Værdipapircentralen (the Danish Securities Center) Egypt Misr Company for Clearing, Settlement, and Central Depository Estonia Eesti Väärtpaberite Keskdepositoorium Finland The Finnish Central Securities Depository France Société Interprofessionnelle pour la Compensation des Valeurs Mobilières (SICOVAM) Germany Deutsche Börse Clearing AG Greece The Central Securities Depository (Apothetirion Titlon AE) Hong Kong The Central Clearing and Settlement System Central Money Markets Unit Hungary The Central Depository and Clearing House (Budapest) Ltd. (KELER) India The National Securities Depository Limited Indonesia Bank Indonesia Ireland Central Bank of Ireland Securities Settlement Office Israel The Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Clearing House Ltd. Bank of Israel Italy Monte Titoli S.p.A. Banca d’Italia Ivory Coast Depositaire Central – Banque de Règlement Jamaica The Jamaican Central Securities Depository Japan Bank of Japan Net System Kenya Central Bank of Kenya Republic of Korea Korea Securities Depository Corporation Latvia The Latvian Central Depository Lebanon The Custodian and Clearing Center of Financial Instruments for Lebanon and the Middle East (MIDCLEAR) X.X.X. The Central Bank of Lebanon Lithuania The Central Securities Depository of Lithuania Malaysia The Malaysian Central Depository Sdn. Bhd. Bank Negara Malaysia, Scripless Securities Trading and Safekeeping System Mauritius The Central Depository & Settlement Co. Ltd. Mexico S.D. INDEVAL, S.A. de C.V. (Instituto para el Depósito de Valores) Morocco Maroclear The Netherlands Nederlands Centraal Instituut voor Giraal Effectenverkeer B.V. (NECIGEF) De Nederlandsche Bank N.V. New Zealand New Zealand Central Securities Depository Limited Norway Verdipapirsentralen (the Norwegian Registry of Securities) Oman Muscat Securities Market Pakistan Central Depository Company of Pakistan Limited Peru Caja de Valores y Liquidaciones S.A. (CAVALI) Philippines The Philippines Central Depository, Inc. The Registry of Scripless Securities (XXXX) of the Bureau of the Treasury Poland The National Depository of Securities (Krajowy Depozyt Papierów Wartościowych) Central Treasury Bills Registrar Portugal Central de Valores Mobiliários (Central) Romania National Securities Clearing, Settlement and Depository Co. Bucharest Stock Exchange Registry Division Singapore The Central Depository (Pte) Limited Monetary Authority of Singapore Slovak Republic Stredisko Cenných Papierov National Bank of Slovakia Slovenia Klirinsko Depotna Xxxxxx x.x. South Africa The Central Depository Limited Spain Servicio de Compensación y Liquidación de Valores, S.A. Banco de España, Central de Anotaciones en Cuenta Sri Lanka Central Depository System (Pvt) Limited Sweden Värdepapperscentralen AB (the Swedish Central Securities Depository) Switzerland Schweizerische Effekten - Giro AG Taiwan - R.O.C. The Taiwan Securities Central Depository Co., Ltd. Thailand Thailand Securities Depository Company Limited Tunisia Société Tunisienne Interprofessionelle de Compensation et de Dépôt de Valeurs Mobilières Central Bank of Tunisia Tunisian Treasury Turkey Takas ve Saklama Bankasi A.S. (TAKASBANK) Central Bank of Turkey Ukraine The National Bank of Ukraine United Kingdom The Bank of England, The Central Gilts Office and The Central Moneymarkets Office Uruguay Central Bank of Uruguay Venezuela Central Bank of Venezuela Zambia Lusaka Central Depository Limited Bank of Zambia
As-Built Plans Within thirty (30) days after completion of Tenant’s Changes requiring the submission of plans to Landlord, Tenant shall furnish to Landlord a complete set of “as-built” plans and specifications.
Abnormally High Tenders 36.4 An abnormally high price is one where the tender price, in combination with other constituent elements of the Tender, appears unreasonably too high to the extent that the Procuring Entity is concerned that it (the Procuring Entity) may not be getting value for money or it may be paying too high a price for the contract compared with market prices or that genuine competition between Tenderers is compromised.
36.5 In case of an abnormally high tender price, the Procuring Entity shall make a survey of the market prices, check if the estimated cost of the contract is correct and review the Tender Documents to check if the specifications, scope of work and conditions of contract are contributory to the abnormally high tenders. The Procuring Entity may also seek written clarification from the tenderer on the reason for the high tender price. The Procuring Entity shall proceed as follows:
i) If the tender price is abnormally high based on wrong estimated cost of the contract, the Procuring Entity may accept or not accept the tender depending on the Procuring Entity's budget considerations.
ii) If specifications, scope of work and/or conditions of contract are contributory to the abnormally high tender prices, the Procuring Entity shall reject all tenders and may retender for the contract based on revised estimates, specifications, scope of work and conditions of contract, as the case may be.
36.6 If the Procuring Entity determines that the Tender Price is abnormally too high because genuine competition between tenderers is compromised (often due to collusion, corruption or other manipulations), the Procuring Entity shall reject all Tenders and shall institute or cause relevant Government Agencies to institute an investigation on the cause of the compromise, before retendering.
CFR 200 328. Failure to submit such required Performance Reports may cause a delay or suspension of funding. 30 ILCS 705/1 et seq.
PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* credits contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses). All parties must sign the document; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.
Unbundled Copper Loops (UCL) 2.4.1 BellSouth shall make available Unbundled Copper Loops (UCLs). The UCL is a copper twisted pair Loop that is unencumbered by any intervening equipment (e.g., filters, load coils, range extenders, digital loop carrier, or repeaters) and is not intended to support any particular telecommunications service. The UCL will be offered in two types – Designed and Non-Designed.
Union Label Upon depletion of existing stocks, all uniforms and clothing issued by the Employer shall bear a recognized union label.
As-Builts Seller shall provide final as-built drawings of the Seller-Owned Interconnection Facilities within 30 Days of the successful completion of the Acceptance Test.
