Capability for operation in the Sample Clauses

Capability for operation in the arctic environment Starting a power generator from freezing temperatures is still a huge challenge for conventional technologies. In the REFCS concept, the fuel cell stack has shown capability of unassisted start-up from -25 °C. This ability relates to the automotive type metal bipolar plate design used in the stacks. The fuel processor uses a 30 w-% ethanol water mixture having a freezing point of -19 °C, so the system can in principle start from complete hibernation at that temperature. With the hydrogen buffer tank and fuel cell by-product heat distribution to ethanol vessel heat-up, the system will be able to start-up from -25 °C. The possibility for cold operation is a major advantage to conventional diesel generators and opens completely new markets for off-grid arctic regions. As a summary, the best opportunities for the REFCS lie in applications where noise and particle/NOx emissions are not tolerated, fuel logistics plays a large role in the overall costs, and a renewable/sustainable fuel is preferred.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Capability for operation in the

  • COOPERATION IN IMPLEMENTATION On demand of the other Spouse and without undue delay or expense, each Spouse shall execute, acknowledge, or deliver any instrument, furnish any information, or perform any other acts reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. If a Spouse fails to execute any document as required by this provision, the court may appoint the court clerk or his or her authorized designee to execute the document on that Xxxxxx’s behalf.

  • Responsibility for Property Lessor is not responsible for any damage to or loss of Renter’s or anyone else’s property.

  • Cost Responsibility for Network Upgrades 9 5.1 Applicability 9 5.2 Network Upgrades 9

  • Responsibility for Equipment City shall not be responsible for any damage to persons or property as a result of the use, misuse or failure of any equipment used by Contractor, or by any of its employees, even though such equipment be furnished, rented or loaned to Contractor by City.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • Responsibility for Damage Resident is solely responsible for any damage, defacement or loss within the assigned bedroom space. All assigned residents of an apartment are jointly and severally responsible for any damage, defacement or loss to common areas, other parts of the facility, fixtures or appliances, except for the portion of damages over $100,000 where it is finally established that Resident or one or more other residents of the apartment were solely at fault for the entire loss, in which case such person(s) will be solely responsible. Resident is fully responsible for the conduct of Resident’s guests, visitors, licensees and invitees (“Guests”), including without limitation harm to individuals or damage or defacement of any part of the Property or its fixtures or property of third parties (including other residents) by such Guests.

  • Responsibility for Costs The Servicer is responsible for collection from such Borrower of any recording or similar costs or expenses incidental to the granting of relief with respect to a delinquent Mortgage Loan.

  • Responsibility for Evaluation Within each school the Principal will be responsible for the evaluation of employees assigned to that school. Evaluation will be made by the Principal or a qualified administrator. An employee assigned to more than one school will be evaluated by the Principal of the school in which the employee is assigned for the greater amount of time, with input provided by the Principal of the other school. Any Principal or person charged with the responsibility of evaluation of employees may involve other staff and students in the process if acceptable to the certificated teacher being evaluated.

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

  • Cost Responsibility for Interconnection Facilities and Distribution Upgrades 4.1 Interconnection Facilities 4.2 Distribution Upgrades

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.