Common use of CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Clause in Contracts

CITY COUNCIL REVIEW. The decision of the arbitrator within the limits herein prescribed shall be in the form of a recommendation to the City Council. However, if the City Council declines to review the arbitrator’s recommendation, said recommendation shall be deemed binding upon both the City and the IAFF, Local 1906 and the grievant. If the City Council decides to review the arbitrator’s recommendations, it must undertake such review no later than the second regularly scheduled Council meeting following issuance of the recommendation. At a minimum, such review, which may be requested by either party, shall include a review of the hearing record and briefs submitted by the respective parties. The Council may, if it deems appropriate, permit oral arguments by representatives of the parties as well as asking for additional written or oral evidence. In the event of such request, the presentation or argument and/or evidence must be in the presence of both parties. Within thirty (30) working days after receiving the record, the City Council shall render a decision on the matter, which decision shall be final and binding on all parties subject to the following provision: in order to reject the advisory arbitrator’s recommendations, the City Council’s vote must be by a margin of four to one or better. If the Council does not render such a decision within the specified time limits, then it shall be deemed to have adopted the arbitrator’s recommendations.

CITY COUNCIL REVIEW. The decision of the arbitrator within the limits herein prescribed shall be in the form of a recommendation to the City Council. However, if the City Council declines to review the arbitrator’s recommendation, said recommendation shall be deemed binding upon both the City and the IAFF, IAFF Local 1906 and the grievant. If the City Council decides to review the arbitrator’s recommendations, it must undertake such review no later than the second regularly scheduled Council meeting following issuance of the recommendation. At a minimum, such review, which may be requested by either party, shall include a review of the hearing record and briefs submitted by the respective parties. The Council may, if it deems appropriate, permit oral arguments by representatives of the parties as well as asking for additional written or oral evidence. In the event of such request, the presentation or argument and/or evidence must be in the presence of both parties. Within thirty (30) working days after receiving the record, the City Council shall render a decision on the matter, which decision shall be final and binding on all parties subject to the following provision: in order to reject the advisory arbitrator’s recommendations, the City Council’s vote must be by a margin of four to one or better. If the Council does not render such a decision within the specified time limits, then it shall be deemed to have adopted the arbitrator’s recommendations.

CITY COUNCIL REVIEW. The decision of the arbitrator within the limits herein prescribed shall be in the form of a recommendation to the City Council. However, if the City Council declines to review the arbitrator’s recommendation, said recommendation shall be deemed binding upon both the City and the IAFF, Local 1906 and the grievantUnion. If the City Council decides to review the arbitrator’s recommendations, it must undertake such review no later than the second regularly scheduled Council meeting following issuance of the recommendation. At a minimum, such review, which may be requested by either party, shall include a review of the hearing record and briefs submitted by the respective parties. The Council may, if it deems appropriate, permit oral arguments by representatives of the parties as well as asking for additional written or oral evidence. In the event of such request, the presentation or argument and/or evidence must be in the presence of both parties. Within thirty (30) working days after receiving the record, the City Council shall render a decision on the matter, which decision shall be final and binding on all parties subject to the following provision: in order to reject the advisory arbitrator’s recommendations, the City Council’s vote must be by a margin of four to one or better. If the Council does not render such a decision within the specified time limits, then it shall be deemed to have adopted the arbitrator’s recommendations.