City S. 00xx Xxxxxx Contributions. The City approved the imposition of an additional ¼ cent sales tax to be used for restoring, rehabilitating, and expanding the City’s street infrastructure. Having imposed such a tax, the City Council has subsequently identified the S. 40th Arterial Improvements described herein as a project toward which a portion of the additional sales tax revenue generated by the additional ¼ cent sales tax should be allocated.
City S. (Decision No. 13), FD 36500 et al., slip op. at 3–4 (STB served Feb. 18, 2022), based on the analysis discussed above, we now find that such a determination is not 11 The Board notes that NSR amended its responsive application to address the criticisms raised by CSXT. As discussed, the Board finds the amended responsive application to be in substantial compliance with the applicable regulations. 12 Based on the environmental information submitted by CN regarding its responsive application, it appears that the thresholds triggering an environmental review under the Board’s regulations at 49 CFR 1105.6(b)(4) and 1105.7(e)(5) would be reached or exceeded. Therefore, the Board’s Office of Environmental Analysis (OEA) will conduct an environmental and historic review of CN’s responsive application that will be separate from, but conducted concurrently with, OEA’s ongoing environmental and historic review of the Transaction. NSR’s responsive application seeking trackage rights is categorically excluded from environmental and historic review under 49 CFR 1105.6(c)(3) and 1105.8(b)(3). 13 This is consistent with another regulatory provision that appears to recognize that a minor/ significant determination will not be required for every responsive application. See 49 CFR 1180.4(d)(4)(v) (‘‘Each responsive application filed and accepted (if required) is considered consolidated with the primary application.’’) necessary.14 Notice of the responsive applications will be published in the Federal Register to ensure that all parties are aware of them.
City S
