Claimant Status Sample Clauses

The Claimant Status clause defines who is recognized as having the right to make a claim under the agreement. Typically, this clause specifies whether only the direct parties to the contract, or also third parties such as successors, assigns, or affiliates, are eligible to bring claims. For example, it may clarify that only the named buyer or seller can initiate a dispute, or it may extend rights to parent companies or subsidiaries. The core function of this clause is to prevent ambiguity about who can enforce the contract, thereby reducing the risk of unexpected or unauthorized claims.
Claimant Status. CLAIMANT represents and the COMPANY confirms such representation, as follows: a. CLAIMANT believes it is not an affiliate, now or by way of this Agreement, and relies upon the COMPANY knowledge of the members of the Board, officers and shareholdings, etc. in such regard (COMPANY represents to CLAIMANT that it has concluded and CLAIMANT may rely upon same, that CLAIMANT is not and will not be, by way of this Agreement, as affiliate of the COMPANY.); and CLAIMANT is (i) an "accredited investor" as that term is defined in Rule 501 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the "Act" by reason of Rule 501 and (ii) able, by reason of the business and financial experience of its officers (if an entity) and professional advisors, as a sophisticated investor.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Claimant Status. Claimant represents and the Company confirms such representation, as follows: A. Claimant believes it is not an affiliate, now or by way of this Agreement; and B. Claimant is (i) an "accredited investor" as that term is defined in Rule 501 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the "Act" by reason of Rule 501 and (ii) able, by reason of the business and financial experience, a sophisticated investor.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Claimant Status. CLAIMANT represents and the COMPANY confirms such representation, as follows: a. CLAIMANT believes it is not an affiliate, now or by way of this Agreement, and relies upon the COMPANY knowledge of the members of the Board, officers and shareholdings, etc. in such regard (COMPANY represents to CLAIMANT that it has concluded and CLAIMANT may rely upon same, that CLAIMANT is not and will not be, by way of this Agreement, an affiliate of the COMPANY); and CLAIMANT is (i) an "accredited investor" as that term is defined in Rule 501 under the Securities Act of 1933and (ii) capable, by reason of the business and financial experience of its officers (if an entity) and professional advisors, as a sophisticated investor, of evaluating, the merits and risks of the prospective investment;.
View Source

Related to Claimant Status

  • Independent Status The employees, volunteers, or agents of each party who are engaged in the performance of this Agreement will continue to be employees, volunteers, or agents of that party and will not for any purpose be employees, volunteers, or agents of the other party.

  • Current Status Sacramento County recently adopted a revised American River Parkway Plan which includes specific policies related to implementing water flows protective of the lower American River ecosystem. The Parkway Plan serves as a guide for other local, state and federal agencies with authority within the American River Parkway under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and the Urban American River Parkway Preservation Act. Sacramento County, through the Water Forum, is in the process of preparing a draft environmental impact report to institute the FMS consistent with the American River Parkway Plan and the coequal goals of the Water Forum Agreement by entering into an operations agreement with Reclamation or by seeking to modify Reclamation’s Folsom Dam water right permits or other measures. Reclamation has been operating the Folsom and Nimbus Dams in accordance with the minimum release requirements of the FMS since 2006. In 2009, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) included the FMS flow, operational criteria, American River Group, and monitoring requirements in the Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives of the Biological Opinion (BO) for operating the CVP. The NMFS BO also called for an iterative temperature management planning process that is consistent with the water temperature objectives of the FMS. The Water Forum is currently investigating the potential for an improved Flow Standard for the lower American River that would provide increased protection of salmonid species and improved water supply reliability.

  • Student Status Licensee must maintain status as a student registered at Cal Poly with a minimum of eight (8) Cal Poly quarter units or if a graduate student, four (4) units. Exception requests must be submitted in writing to University Housing for approval (or contact the Disability Resource Center if disability related) if Licensee falls below these minimums. Dropping below the minimum is not considered a standard for cancellation and will not release the Licensee from paying any housing-related fees. The University may, at its sole option and discretion, revoke this License in accordance with the provisions herein if the Licensee fails to enroll in the minimum units, or drops below the minimum unit requirement after the beginning of the academic fee period.

  • REIT Status The Borrower qualifies as, and has elected to be treated as, a REIT and is in compliance with all requirements and conditions imposed under the Internal Revenue Code to allow the Borrower to maintain its status as a REIT.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.