Combined results Sample Clauses

Combined results. For the four benchmark expressions described in (B) and (C), and for the other three benchmark expressions, we observe that the relative improvement of the choice of the best neighbourhood structure compared to the worst neighbourhood structure is never more than 10%. Furthermore, we observe that there are two groups of neighbourhood structures when the state space is sufficiently large. Group 1 makes small changes to the state (‘1 swap’, ‘2 swap’, ‘3 swap’, ‘1 shift’). Group 2 makes large structural changes (‘mirror’, ‘many shift’ ‘mirror shift’). The two groups converge before N = 1000 for expressions with small state spaces, such as HEP(σ), but are further apart for expressions with more variables, such as HEP(F13) and HEP(b). The difference in quality in the group itself is often negligible (less than 3%). Thus, as a strategy to apply the appropriate neighbourhood structure, we suggest to distribute the number of parallel runs evenly among the two groups: in the case of four parallel runs, two of the runs can be performed using one neighbourhood structure from the group 1 and two from group 2.‌

Combined results. UBICS shall cause the Combined Companies to publish interim financial information within 30 days following the conclusion of the first month of combined operations following the closing of the Transaction.

Combined results. The following is a summary of the combined results of the Target Group for each of the three years ended 31 December 1999 and the six months ended 30 June 2000, prepared on the basis set out in Section 1 above: (Turnover)............................. (a) Total operating revenue........... Operating expenses 12,977 18,859 26,384 15,706 Other operating expenses ......... (b) 2,054 3,404 4,349 2,697 Total operating expenses ......... 8,193 13,408 17,864 9,956 Profit from operations............. 4,784 5,451 8,520 5,750