Comparisons of Surgical Factors Sample Clauses

Comparisons of Surgical Factors. A comparison of mean keratometric astigmatism values stratified by the surgical factors is found in Table 3. When number of sutures is classified as a binary variable, the difference in keratometric astigmatism between 1 or 2 sutures and 3 or 4 sutures is -0.39 D (p = 0.364). The difference is slightly more pronounced at 1 year of age (Diff: -0.43 D; p = 0.307), but neither are significant. The change in the two groups between baseline and 1 year is also non-significant (Diff: -0.08 D; p = 0.895). Boxplots showing the distribution of keratometric astigmatism when stratified by the number of sutures as a binary variable are shown in Figure 4(a).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Comparisons of Surgical Factors

  • Other Factors The Employer may provide for additional formal and informal evaluations as it shall determine to be necessary for the proper conduct of the educational program and the utilization of its employees. The evaluation opinions of the Employer shall not be subject to the Grievance Procedure if the procedures herein set forth have been followed.

  • Measurements and arithmetic conventions All measurements and calculations shall be in the metric system and calculations done to 2 (two) decimal places, with the third digit of 5 (five) or above being rounded up and below 5 (five) being rounded down.

  • Additional Factors 16. The Respondent has not previously been the subject of MFDA disciplinary proceedings.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Demographic, Classification and Wage Information XXXXXX agrees to coordinate the accumulation and distribution of demographic, classification and wage data, as specified in the Letter of Understanding dated December 14, 2011, to CUPE on behalf of Boards of Education. The data currently housed in the Employment Data and Analysis Systems (EDAS) will be the source of the requested information.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • TEACHER EVALUATIONS A. Each teacher shall have the right, upon request, to review the contents of his/her personal file folder.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • JOB CLASSIFICATIONS AND RATES OF PAY 7.01 Employees shall be classified and paid in accordance with Schedule "A" which is attached to this Agreement and forms a part of it.

  • Performance Factors (a) Each party will notify the other party of the existence of a Performance Factor, as soon as reasonably possible after the party becomes aware of the Performance Factor. The Notice will:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.