Consistency of Bid Evaluation Process With Least-Cost Best Sample Clauses

Consistency of Bid Evaluation Process With Least-Cost Best. Fit Decision 1. Determination of market value of bid; 2. Calculation of transmission adders and integration costs; 3. Evaluation of portfolio fit; and 4. Consideration of non-price factors. PG&E examined the reasonableness of the PPA using the same comparison tools used with RPS transactions received in the 2009 RPS Solicitation and with bilaterals currently being offered to PG&E. The general finding is that this Project is highly viable and as a CSP project, provides diversity to PG&E’s renewables portfolio. A more detailed discussion of PG&E’s evaluation of the PPA is provided in Confidential Appendices A and D.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Consistency of Bid Evaluation Process With Least-Cost Best. Fit Decision 1) Determination of market value of bid; 2) Calculation of transmission adders and integration costs; 3) Evaluation of portfolio fit; and 4) Consideration of non-price factors. PG&E examined the reasonableness of the Amended PPA using the same comparison tools used with other RPS transactions received in the 2009 RPS Solicitation. The general finding is that the Project is reasonably priced compared to this peer group. While the economics of this project compare unfavorably to PG&E’s 2011 RPS RFO shortlist, PG&E entered into the Amended PPA with Rice Solar for the following reasons: 1. The Project will provide technology diversity (use of molten salt heat transfer fluid plus storage) to PG&E’s portfolio. 2. The technology used in the Project will allow PG&E to more easily integrate deliveries of intermittent solar energy from this Project. 3. The Amended PPA allows a previously approved project to avoid default by complying with revised terms that do not add material risk / cost to PG&E customers. 4. The Amended PPA delays deliveries from Oct 1, 2013 to Dec 1, 2015. Projects with later start dates are better aligned with PG&E’s incremental RPS compliance needs. 11 Pub. Util. Code § 399.14(a)(2)(B). 12 D.00-00-000. PG&E provides below an overview of each of the criteria applied to the Amended PPA. A more detailed discussion of PG&E’s evaluation of the amended PPA is provided in Confidential Appendices A and D.

Related to Consistency of Bid Evaluation Process With Least-Cost Best

  • Frequency of Evaluation Short form employees shall be evaluated one (1) time per year, which evaluation shall be completed no later than June 1.

  • Commercial Price List Reductions Where NYS Net Prices are based on a discount from Contractor’s list prices, price decreases shall take effect automatically during the Contract term and apply to Purchase Orders submitted on or after the date Contractor lowers its pricing to its customers generally or to similarly situated government customers during the Contract term; or

  • Contract Changes Changes may not be made in the terms and conditions of this contract without the agreement and written permission of the Director of Residence Life or the Director’s designee.

  • Student Evaluation a. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall be responsible for administering the student evaluation process. b. Student evaluation packets for each class containing instruments and instructions shall be distributed to each faculty member by the first week of December during the fall semester and by the last week in April during the spring semester. c. It is expressly agreed that the faculty member being evaluated shall not be present in the classroom when the student evaluation is being administered and that all instruction to students with regard to such student evaluation shall be included in writing on the instrument, provided further that the designated unit or non-unit professional shall return the student evaluation directly to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The administering of the student evaluation shall be the responsibility of the President of the College or the President’s designee who shall determine who among unit or non-unit professionals shall administer such student evaluation. Student evaluations shall be valid only if signed by the student; provided, however, that faculty members shall not be entitled to the identity of the student responding unless such student evaluation is used as a basis for dismissal or other disciplinary action and such will be communicated to the students. d. The data from the student evaluation shall be tabulated and copies sent to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The raw data shall be retained by the College for a period of one (1) year during which time the faculty member shall have access thereto upon written request. e. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall review the tabulated data and shall forward a data summary to the faculty member by January 23 for the fall semester and by June 15 for the spring semester. f. The faculty member shall have seven (7) working days in which to respond to such data.

  • Interconnection Facilities Engineering Procurement and Construction Interconnection Facilities, Network Upgrades, and Distribution Upgrades shall be studied, designed, and constructed pursuant to Good Utility Practice. Such studies, design and construction shall be based on the assumed accuracy and completeness of all technical information received by the Participating TO and the CAISO from the Interconnection Customer associated with interconnecting the Large Generating Facility.

  • MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION The goal of this task is to report the benefits resulting from this project. • Enter into agreement with M&V subcontractor per Task 1.9 • Coordinate site visits with the M&V subcontractor at the demonstration site • Develop M&V protocol for pre-installation measurement and calculations following Section II.B.2 of the grant solicitation manual3: o Electric, natural gas and/or other fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (use appropriate emissions factor from Attachment 8 of the grant solicitation manual) of the equipment/process/system(s)/sub-system(s) that are be upgraded and/or replaced and/or modified; and o If necessary, ensure installation of sub-metering equipment and data loggers for pre/post data analysis. • Prepare and provide a detailed Measurement and Verification Plan to include but not be limited to: o A description of the monitoring equipment and instrumentation which will be used; o A description of the key input parameters and output metrics which will be measured; o A description of the M&V protocol and analysis methods to be employed; and o A description of the independent, third-party measurement and verification services to be employed. • Perform three months (or shorter period as approved in writing by the CAM) of pre- installation measurements and calculations, based on the M&V protocol for pre-install • Prepare and provide a Pre-Installation Measurement and Verification Findings Report which includes M&V protocol, pre-install measurements (and calculations), analysis, and results performed in this task. • Develop M&V protocol for post-installation measurements (and calculations) of: o Electric, natural gas and/or other fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (use appropriate emissions factor from Attachment 8 of the grant solicitation manual) of the equipment/process/system(s)/sub-system(s) that will be upgraded and/or replaced and/or modified  Perform 12 months (or shorter period as approved in writing by the CAM) of post- installation measurements based on M&V protocol for post-installation. • Provide a summary of post-installation M&V progress in Progress Report(s) (see subtask 1.5) which shall include but not be limited to: o A narrative on operational highlights from the reporting period, including any stoppages in operation and why; and o A summary of M&V findings from the reporting period. • Analyze post-installation electrical, natural gas and/or other fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. • Prepare and provide a Post-Installation Measurement and Verification Findings Report that includes M&V protocol, pre and post install measurements and calculations, analysis, and results performed in this task. Results should at a minimum report on the reduction of electricity, natural gas and/or other fossil fuel usage and reductions of greenhouse gas emissions that directly result from this project.

  • Evaluation Process ‌ A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of their review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory. B. The supervisor will discuss the evaluation with the employee. The employee will have the opportunity to provide feedback on the evaluation. The discussion may include such topics as: 1. Reviewing the employee’s performance; 2. Identifying ways the employee may improve their performance; 3. Updating the employee’s position description, if necessary; 4. Identifying performance goals and expectations for the next appraisal period; and 5. Identifying employee training and development needs. C. The performance evaluation process will include, but not be limited to, a written performance evaluation on forms used by the Employer, the employee’s signature acknowledging receipt of the forms, and any comments by the employee. A copy of the performance evaluation will be provided to the employee at the time of the review. A copy of the final performance evaluation, including any employee or reviewer comments, will be provided to the employee. The original performance evaluation forms, including the employee’s comments, will be maintained in the employee’s personnel file. D. If an employee disagrees with their performance evaluation, the employee has the right to attach a rebuttal. E. The performance evaluation process is subject to the grievance procedure in Article 30. The specific content of a performance evaluation is not subject to the grievance procedure. F. Performance evaluations will not be used to initiate personnel actions such as transfer, promotion, or discipline.

  • Escalation Process If Customer believes in good faith that Customer has not received quality or timely assistance in response to a support request or that Customer urgently need to communicate important support related business issues to Service Provider’s management, Customer may escalate the support request by contacting Service Provider and requesting that the support request be escalated to work with Customer to develop an action plan.

  • Cost of Living Adjustments (Years 1 and 2: 2020-2021 and 2021-2022)

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the fall semester.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!