CONSULTATION STRUCTURE AND SLA REPORTING Sample Clauses

CONSULTATION STRUCTURE AND SLA REPORTING. Client will on its request receive the service report from Otherside over the past calendar quarter. The SLA report describes as a minimum: ▪ An overview of the number of registered tickets in the past quarter by type of incident: ▪ Functional Questions; ▪ Bugs; ▪ Malfunctions; ▪ An overview of the number of registered tickets in the past quarter by type of change: ▪ Service Requests; ▪ Product Suggestions; ▪ An overview of the number of closed tickets per type of incident with a maximum historical period of 6 months; ▪ An overview of the number of tickets by status: ▪ That are being handled by Otherside; ▪ That are being parked outside Otherside; ▪ An overview of the incidents in the past quarter; ▪ Which % of the Bugs were fixed on time and which % were not fixed on time; ▪ Which % of the Malfunctions have been responded to timely and which % have not been responded to timely; ▪ Which % of the Malfunctions were resolved in time and which % were not resolved in time; ▪ The availability for the Xpert Suite in the past quarter. If the agreed Service Level is not met, or if there are other points of attention in the provided service, the following escalation model applies: ESCALATION LEVEL CONTACT PERSON CLIENT CONTACT PERSON OTHERSIDE LEVEL 1 Functional application manager Employee Xpert Desk LEVEL 2 Coordinator functional application management / service level manager / IT manager Delivery Manager LEVEL 3 Contract owner Account Manager LEVEL 4 Management board Manager Operations By default, Otherside suggests the following consultation structure: 2 x per annum: Service Level Consultation (account manager, delivery manager, Client) 1 x per quarter: Business Account consultation (account manager, Client) 1 x per annum: Strategic consultation (management board and account manager, Client) A definitive consultation structure will be set up in consultation with the Client. 2 CONTINUITY, CAPACITY & AVAILABILITY MANAGEMENT
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to CONSULTATION STRUCTURE AND SLA REPORTING

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Trunk Group Architecture and Traffic Routing The Parties shall jointly engineer and configure Local/IntraLATA Trunks over the physical Interconnection arrangements as follows:

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • COOPERATION IN IMPLEMENTATION On demand of the other Spouse and without undue delay or expense, each Spouse shall execute, acknowledge, or deliver any instrument, furnish any information, or perform any other acts reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. If a Spouse fails to execute any document as required by this provision, the court may appoint the court clerk or his or her authorized designee to execute the document on that Xxxxxx’s behalf.

  • Progress Reporting 5. The IP will submit to UNICEF narrative progress reports against the planned activities contained in the Programme Document, using the PDPR. Unless otherwise agreed between the Parties in writing, these reports will be submitted at the end of every Quarter. The final report will be submitted no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the end the Programme and will be provided together with the FACE form.

  • Audit Cooperation In the event either Party is audited by a taxing authority, the other Party agrees to cooperate fully with the Party being audited in order to respond to any audit inquiries in a proper and timely manner so that the audit and/or any resulting controversy may be resolved expeditiously.

  • Scope of Cooperation 1. The Authorities recognise the importance of close communication concerning the Covered CCPs and intend to cooperate regarding:

  • Technical Cooperation 1. The Parties shall strengthen their cooperation in the field of standards, technical regulations, metrology, market surveillance, accreditation and conformity assessment systems with a view to increasing the mutual understanding of their respective systems and facilitating access to their respective markets. To that end, they may establish regulatory dialogues at both horizontal and sectoral levels.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.