Core Syntax Sample Clauses

Core Syntax. A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.‌ Xxx, Xxxxx. 2015. Giving reflexivity a voice. Doctoral dissertation, University of Califor- nia, Los Angeles. Xxxxx, Xxxx. 2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press. Xxxxx, Xxxx, & Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx. To appear. Switch-reference in American languages: A synthetic overview. In The Routledge handbook of North American languages, ed. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxx, & Xxxx Xxxxxxx. London: Routledge. Xxxxx, Xxxxxx. 2005. Long distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23:757–807. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, & Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx. To appear. Upward Agree is superior. Linguistic Inquiry. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx. 2008. Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi theory: Phi features across modules and interfaces, ed. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx & Xxxxxx Xx´jar, 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxx. 2015. Variable force modality in Washo. In North East Linguistic Society (XXXX) 45, Volume 1, ed. Xxxx Xxx & Xxxxx O¨ zyıldız, 105–114. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA Publications.‌
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Core Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Bobaljik, J. (1995). In terms of Merge: Copy and head-movement. In‌ Pensalfini, R. and Ura, H., editors, Papers on Minimalist Syntax, volume 27, pages 41–64. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge,Massachussets.
Sample 1
Core Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.‌ Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx & Xxxxxx Xxxxxx. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of Spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. Xxxxx, Xxxx. 2015. Adjective agreement in Noon: Evidence for a split theory of noun-mofifier concord. In LSA annual meeting extended abstracts. Portland: Linguistic Society of America. Xxxxx, Xxxx X. 2003. Agreement, dislocation, and partial configurationality. In Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxx & Xxxx Xxx Xxxxxx (eds.), Formal approaches to function in grammar, 107–134. Amsterdam: Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx. Xxxxx, Xxxx X. 2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Xxxxx, Xxxx X. 2015. Case: Its principles and its parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Xxxxx, Xxxx X. & Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx. 2010. Two modalities of case assignment: Case in Sakha. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28(3). 593–642. Xxxxx, Xxxxxx & Xxxxx Xxxxx. 2009. Cyclic Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40(1). 35–73. Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx & Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx. 2009. Closest conjunct agreement in head final languages. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 9. 67–88.‌ Xxxxx, Xxxxxx & Xxxxxx Xxxxxx. 2013. Locating agreement in grammar: An argu- ment from agreement in conjunctions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31(4). 951–1013. DOI:10.1007/s11049-013-9203-y Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx & Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx. 2019. Checking up on (-)Agree. Linguis- tic Inquiry 50(3). 527–569.‌ Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx X. 2008. Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic opera- tion. In Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxx & Xxxxxx Xxxxx (eds.), Phi-Theory: Phi fea- tures across interfaces and modules, 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx X. & Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx. 2005. The domain of agreement. Nat- ural Language & Linguistic Theory 23(4). 809–865. Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx X. 2005. Against ConjP. Lingua 115. 461–482. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx. 2007. On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry 38(4). 589–644. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx. 2009. Unifying first and last conjunct agreement. Natural Lan- guage & Linguistic Theory 27(3). 455–496. DOI:10.1007/s11049-009-9072-6 Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx. 2018. Attraction at a distance: A’-Movement and Case. Linguistic Inquiry 49(3). 409–440. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx. 1997. Empty nouns in Bantu locatives. The Linguistic Review 14(4). 361–410. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx. 2001. Multiple agreement and case deletion: Against phi- incompleteness. Syntax 4(3). 147–163. Xxxxxxx, Xxxx. 1995. The Minimalist Prog...
Sample 1
Core Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Xxxx, X., Xxxxxxxxx, X., and Sportiche, D. (1994). Agreement, word order, and conjunction in some varieties of Arabic. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(2):195–220. Xxxx, X. X., Xxxxxxxxx, X., and Xxxxxxxx, X. (2010). The Syntax of Arabic. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York. Xxxxx, X. X. (2008). The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Xxxxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxx, X., and Xxxxxxxx, M. (2009). Closest conjunct agreement in head final languages. In Xxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxx, X. and Xxxxxxx, X., editors, Linguistic Variation Yearbook, volume 9, pages 67–88. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Publishing Company, Amsterdam. Xxxxx, X. and Xxxxxx, M. (2013). Locating agreement in grammar: An argument from agree- ment in conjunctions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31(4):951–1013. Xxxxxxxx, X. and Xxxxxxxxx, H. (2014). Upward agree is superior. Xxxxxxxx, X. X. (2008). Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Harbour, D., Xxxxx, D., and Be´jar, S., editors, Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces, pages 295–328. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Xxxˇxxxxx´, Zˇ . (2007). On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(4):589–644. Xxxˇxxxxx´, Zˇ . (2009). Unifying first and last conjunct agreement. Natural Language and Lin- guistic Theory, 27:455–496. Xxxxxxxx, X. (2014). Defects of defective intervention. Linguistic Inquiry, 45(4):707–719. Xxxxxxxx, X. (2015). Delayed valuation: a reanalysis of “upwards” complementizer agreement and the mechanics of Case. Syntax, to appear. Xxxxxxx, X. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Xxxxxx, R., Xxxxxxxx, D., and Xxxxxxxxxx, X., editors, Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, pages 89–156. MIT Press. Xxxxxxx, X. (2001). Derivation by phase. In Xxxxxxxxxx, M., editor, Xxx Xxxx: A Life in Linguistics, pages 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Xxxxx, X. (2015). Arabic first conjunct agreement: Against late operations. Presentation at 29th Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics. University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Xxxxx, X. (2000). VSO and left-conjunct agreement: Biblical Hebrew vs. Modern Hebrew. In Carnie, X. and Xxxxxxxxx, E., editors, The Syntax of Verb Initial Languages, pages 75–96. Oxford University Press. Xxxxxxxx, X. (2000). Deriving OV order in Finnish. In Xxxxxxxxx, P., editor, Derivation of VO and OV, pages 123–152. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Publishing Comp...
Sample 1
Core Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Xxxxx, X. (2021). Auxiliary Selection in Italo-Romance – A Nested Agree‌‌ Approach. PhD thesis, Leipzig University. Xxxxxxx, X. and Xxxxxxxxxxx, X. (1997). Obviation in subjunctive clauses and AGR: Evidence from Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15:229–262. Xxxxxxxxx, X. (2000). The Feature Structure of Functional Categories. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Xxxxxxxx, X. (1995). In terms of Merge: Copy and head-movement. In Pensalfini, R. and Xxx, X., editors, Papers on Minimalist Syntax, volume 27, pages 41–64. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge,Massachussets.
Sample 1
Core Syntax. A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Haegeman, L. and X. Xxxxxx (2001) “Adult Null Subjects in the non pro-drop languages: Two Diary Dialects”, in Language Acquisition, 9(4), 329-346 Xxxxxx X. and X. Xxxxx (1999) “Distributed Morphology” in GLOT International Volume 4 Issue 4.
Sample 1
Core Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Xxxxxxxxx, X. (1997). Adverb Placement. Benjamins, Amsterdam. Xxxxxxxx, X. (1995). In terms of Merge: Copy and head-movement. In‌‌ Xxxxxxxxxx, X. and Xxx, H., editors, Papers on Minimalist Syntax, volume 27, pages 41–64. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge,Massachussets.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Core Syntax

  • -wire Unbundled Digital/DS0 Loop These are designed 4-wire Loops that may be configured as 64kbps, 56kbps, 19kbps, and other sub-rate speeds associated with digital data services and will come standard with a test point, OC, and a DLR.

  • Data Usage We may use Data for the following purposes (in each case to the extent permitted by law):

  • Unbundled Channelization (Multiplexing) 5.7.1 To the extent NewPhone is purchasing DS1 or DS3 or STS-1 Dedicated Transport pursuant to this Agreement, Unbundled Channelization (UC) provides the optional multiplexing capability that will allow a DS1 (1.544 Mbps) or DS3 (44.736 Mbps) or STS-1 (51.84 Mbps) Network Elements to be multiplexed or channelized at a BellSouth central office. Channelization can be accomplished through the use of a multiplexer or a digital cross-connect system at the discretion of BellSouth. Once UC has been installed, NewPhone may request channel activation on a channelized facility and BellSouth shall connect the requested facilities via COCIs. The COCI must be compatible with the lower capacity facility and ordered with the lower capacity facility. This service is available as defined in NECA 4.

  • Wire Unbundled DS1 Digital Loop This is a designed 4-wire Loop that is provisioned according to industry standards for DS1 or Primary Rate ISDN services and will come standard with a test point, OC, and a DLR. A DS1 Loop may be provisioned over a variety of loop transmission technologies including copper, HDSL-based technology or fiber optic transport systems. It will include a 4-Wire DS1 Network Interface at the End User’s location.

  • DISCLOSEABLE TRANSACTION On 22 October 2021, the Lender, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into the Loan Agreement with the Borrower pursuant to which the Lender has agreed to grant a loan of HK$10 million to the Borrower for a term of 156 months.

  • Unbundled Network Terminating Wire (UNTW) 2.8.3.1 UNTW is unshielded twisted copper wiring that is used to extend circuits from an intra-building network cable terminal or from a building entrance terminal to an individual End User’s point of demarcation. It is the final portion of the Loop that in multi-subscriber configurations represents the point at which the network branches out to serve individual subscribers.

  • Reducing Text Messaging While Driving Pursuant to Executive Order 13513, 74 FR 51225 (Oct. 6, 2009), Recipient should encourage its employees, subrecipients, and contractors to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving, and Recipient should establish workplace safety policies to decrease accidents caused by distracted drivers.

  • Click Save Save a cloud model to local machine

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.