Current Approach Sample Clauses

Current Approach. The current approach faces many limitations: • Everything is centralised. The current centralised system architecture concentrates all services and processing in one location, leading to potential system failures and latency issues. A revised technical use case would explore decentralised architectures to distribute processing across multiple nodes. This would improve system resilience, reduce latency, and offer a scalable solution for geographically dispersed users. • All data resides with the service provider. With all data stored by the service provider, concerns arise about privacy and security. The technical use case should develop a distributed data storage solution, possibly using blockchain or decentralised databases, to enhance data security and give users more control. Ensuring data encryption, access control, and compliance with data protection laws are key aspects of this approach. • No reliability on the customer side - network dead, no service. Dependence on continuous network connectivity leads to service disruptions during network outages. A technical use case should focus on offline capabilities or local caching to maintain basic functionalities during disconnections. Systems designed to operate offline and sync with central servers once online would ensure uninterrupted service. • Huge data ingress over limited network connection. Significant data ingress through limited network connections causes congestion and inefficiency. The technical use case would look into optimising data transfer using data compression, selective transmission, or edge computing to process data closer to its source. This approach aims to minimise data transfer volume, ease network congestion, and enhance system performance.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Current Approach. While the Italian transmission grid is centrally managed by a single PDC, the introduction of PMUs in the distribution grid is still at an experimental level. Nevertheless, the massive amount of PMUs and PDCs in the future network makes this centralized approach (a) hardly scalable, (b) not resilient to network failures or forced disconnections (e.g., to preserve a portion of the network from an ongoing attack).
Current Approach. To solve the above computing problem with the current technology, we can follow either one of the following two approaches: (a) centralized processing, (b) individual computing. • Centralized processing The robot fleet operates under a centralized communication architecture, whereby the intelligence (i.e., processing resources and software) is placed in a central component, such as the fleet manager (or orchestration system). All communication between the individual robots and the fleet manager is routed through an intermediary edge or cloud device. In this setup, the central device acts as a hub that (a) implements processing algorithms, and

Related to Current Approach

  • Project Approach € Project schedules and budgets are reviewed by the Project Manager on a weekly basis during our company-wide Project Managers Meeting using project status reports generated by our control software (Deltek Vision). Progress is compared to the schedule and budget to ensure adequate resources are available and that necessary coordination is occurring. Costs are reported real time, with actual labor based on time sheet entry and actual expense costs based on invoices. The reporting system can be customized to track specific tasks or efforts in multiple categories, making it flexible enough to adapt to any project specific requirements. We hold regular project coordination meetings to facilitate communication and information transfer among the design team. These meetings are held weekly and are supplemented with e-mail communication, as well as telephone conversations. We hold monthly project status meetings with your project manager to update project status, discuss priorities, and receive direction from City staff. This provides an opportunity for communication and information to flow openly between the City and the design team. These meetings are supplemented by communications that will occur via e-mail and telephone. We conduct meetings with other agencies and stakeholders impacted by the work as needed. E-mail and telephone communication work well for quick questions or minor issues, but we have found that the most effective means of communication with other agencies and stakeholders is the “old-fashioned” face- to-face mexxxxx. Xxbble’s record of providing quality civil engineering services to our clients reflects our ability to manage multiple projects effectively and efficiently. Our philosophy is that each project is personally overseen by one of our principal officers, thereby providing immediate attention to all project aspects (i.e. negotiations, communications, schedule, budgets).

  • AGREEMENT APPROVAL This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any previously executed agreements, representations, verbal or written, to buy and/or sell the property. Neither this agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be transferred or assigned by Buyer without the prior written consent of Seller.

  • Settlement Approval The approval of the Master Servicer need not be requested for disposition of insurance loss settlements and the Servicer may disburse the loss proceeds as provided herein.

  • General Approach The parties will strive to achieve on-going performance improvement. They will follow a proactive, collaborative and responsive approach to performance management and improvement. Either party may request a meeting at any time. The parties will use their best efforts to meet as soon as possible following a request.

  • Approach All investments are to be made using the value approach by investing in companies at prices below their underlying long term values to protect capital from loss and earn income over time and provide operating income as needed. With regard to equities, no attempt is made to forecast the economy or the stock market. The manager will attempt to identify financially sound companies with good potential profitability which are selling at large discounts to their intrinsic value. Appropriate measures of low prices may consist of some or all of the following characteristics: low price earnings ratios, high dividend yields, significant discounts to book value, and free cash flow. Downside protection is obtained by seeking a margin of safety in terms of a sound financial position and a low price in relation to intrinsic value. Appropriate measures of financial integrity which are regularly monitored, include debt/equity ratios, financial leverage, asset turnover, profit margin, return on equity, and interest coverage. As a result of this bargain hunting approach, it is anticipated that purchases will be made when economic and issue-specific conditions are less than ideal and sentiment is uncertain or negative. Conversely, it is expected that gains will be realized when issue-specific factors are positive and sentiment is buoyant. The investment time horizon is one business cycle (approximately 3-5 years). As regards bonds, the approach is similar. No attempt is made to forecast the economy or interest rates. The manager will attempt to purchase attractively priced bonds offering yields better than Treasury bonds with maturities of 10 years or less that are of sound quality i.e. whose obligations are expected to be fully met as they come due. We do not regard rating services as being an unimpeachable source for assessing credit quality any more than we would regard a broker's recommendation on a stock as being necessarily correct. In any form of investment research and evaluation, there is no substitute for the reasoned judgement of the investment committee and its managers.

  • Interconnection Product Options Interconnection Customer has selected the following (checked) type of Interconnection Service:

  • FAA APPROVAL This Agreement may be subject to approval of the FAA. If the FAA disapproves this Agreement, it will become null and void, and both Parties will bear their own expenses relative to this Agreement, up to the date of disapproval.

  • Minimum Data Necessary Shared The Provider attests that the Student Data request by the Provider from the LEA in order for the LEA to access the Provider’s products and/or services is limited to the Student Data that is adequate, relevant, and limited to what is necessary in relation to the K-12 school purposes for which it is processed.

  • Final Settlement Approval 4.1 No later than ten (10) business days before the Fairness Hearing, Class Counsel shall submit to the Court a motion for entry of the Final Order (Exhibit 5) in the form approved by Class Counsel and Defense Counsel, which shall request approval by the Court of the terms of this Settlement Agreement and entry of the Final Order in accordance with this Settlement Agreement. The Final Order as proposed by the Settling Parties shall provide for the following, among other things, as is necessary to carry out the Settlement consistent with applicable law and governing Plan documents:

  • Project Approval The County may issue a Job Order Authorization for the Work, to include the firm-fixed-price of the Job Order and the project duration. Contractor agrees that all clauses of this Contract are applicable to any Job Order issued hereunder. The County reserves the right to reject a Contractor’s Quote based on unjustifiable quantities and/or methods, performance periods, inadequate documentation, or other inconsistencies or deficiencies on the Contractor’s part in the sole opinion of the County. The County reserves the right to issue a unilateral Job Order authorization for the Work if a Quote price cannot be mutually agreed upon. This is based upon unjustifiable quantities in the sole opinion of the County. The County also reserves the right to not issue a Job Order Authorization if the County’s requirement is no longer valid or the project is not funded. In these instances, the Contractor has no right of claim to recover Quote expenses. The County may pursue continuing valid requirements by other means where Contract was not reached with the Contractor.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.