Decision-Making; Escalation to Senior Officers Sample Clauses

Decision-Making; Escalation to Senior Officers. The Parties will endeavor in good faith and in compliance with this Agreement to reach unanimous agreement with respect to all matters within the JSC’s authority. Each Party’s representatives on the JSC will collectively have one vote, (the “Party Vote”) and no action or decision will be taken by the JSC without unanimous Party Vote (i.e., the affirmative Party Vote of each Party). If the JSC is not be able to reach agreement with respect to a matter at a duly called meeting of the JSC, then either Party may refer such matter to the Senior Officers for resolution, and the Senior Officers will attempt to resolve the matter in good faith. If the Senior Officers fail to resolve such matter within [***] Business Days after the date on which the matter is referred to the Senior Officers (unless a longer period is agreed to by the Parties), then Lian will have the final decision-making authority as to all matters relating to [***], except for (a) [***], (b) [***] (i) [***], (ii) [***], or (iii) [***] (A) [***] or (B) [***]; and (c) [***]. Lyra will have final decision-making authority over [***]. The status quo with respect to any matter that is not subject to a Party’s final decision-making authority, and is not resolved at the JSC or by escalation to the Senior Officers as described above, will [***].
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Decision-Making; Escalation to Senior Officers. Company and Licensee will endeavor in good faith and in compliance with this Agreement to reach unanimous agreement with respect to all matters within the JSC’s authority. Company’s representatives on the JSC will collectively have one vote and Licensee’s representatives on the JSC will collectively have one vote, (the “Party Vote”) and no action or decision will be taken by the JSC without unanimous Party Vote (i.e., the affirmative Party Vote of each of Company and Licensee), which will be documented in written meeting minutes, which shall be approved by the JSC through formal processes that the JSC may reasonably put in place. Should the JSC not be able to reach agreement with respect to a matter at a duly called meeting of the JSC, either Company or Licensee may refer such matter to the Senior Officers for resolution, and the Senior Officers will attempt to resolve the matter in good faith. If the Senior Officers fail to resolve such matter within [***] after the date on which the matter is first referred to the Senior Officers (unless a longer period is agreed to by Company and Licensee), then, the Senior Officer of Licensee will have the final decision-making authority on all matters relating to [***], unless such matter relates to:
Decision-Making; Escalation to Senior Officers. The Parties will endeavor in good faith and in compliance with this Agreement to reach unanimous agreement with respect to all matters within the JSC’s authority. Each Party’s representatives on the JSC will collectively have one vote (the “Party Vote”) on all matters before the JSC, and no action or decision will be taken by the JSC without a unanimous Party Vote (i.e., the affirmative Party Vote of each Party). A decision made in accordance with this Section 6.5 shall be deemed to be a decision made by the JSC. Should the JSC not be able to reach agreement with respect to a matter at a duly called meeting of the JSC, either Party may refer such matter to the Senior Officers for resolution, and the Senior Officers will attempt to resolve the matter in good faith. If the Senior Officers fail to resolve such matter within [***] days after the date on which the matter is referred to the Senior Officers (unless a longer period is agreed to by the Parties), then:
Decision-Making; Escalation to Senior Officers. The Parties will endeavor in good faith and in compliance with this Agreement to reach unanimous agreement with respect to all matters within the JSC’s authority. Each Party’s representatives on the JSC will collectively have one vote, (the “Party Vote”) and no action or decision will be taken by the JSC without unanimous Party Vote (i.e., the affirmative Party Vote of each Party), which will be documented by a written consent signed by each Party’s co-chairperson. Should the JSC not be able to reach agreement with respect to a matter at a duly called meeting of the JSC, either Party may refer such matter to the Senior Officers for resolution, and the Senior Officers will attempt to resolve the matter in good faith. If the Senior Officers fail to resolve such matter within [***] after the date on which the matter is referred to the Senior Officers (unless a longer period is agreed to by the Parties), then [***]. Notwithstanding any provision of this ARTICLE V to the contrary, the JSC will not have the authority to amend the terms or conditions of this Agreement.
Decision-Making; Escalation to Senior Officers. The Parties will endeavor in good faith and in compliance with this Agreement to reach unanimous agreement with respect to all matters within the JSC’s authority. [***]. Should the JSC not be able to reach agreement with respect to a matter at a duly called meeting of the JSC, either Party may refer such matter to the Executive Officers for resolution in accordance with Section 14.1, and the Executive Officers will attempt to resolve the matter in good faith (subject only to, in the case of Bayer, approval of the applicable management board, if required). If the Executive Officers fail to resolve such matter within [***] after the date on which the matter is referred to the Executive Officers (unless a longer period is agreed to by the Parties), then:
Decision-Making; Escalation to Senior Officers. The fourth sentence of Section 5.5 of the License Agreement is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety as follows: If the Senior Officers fail to resolve such matter within [***] after the date on which matter is referred to the Senior Officers (unless a longer period is agreed to by the Parties), then, [***].
Decision-Making; Escalation to Senior Officers. Each Party’s representatives on the JSC will collectively have [***] (the “Party Vote”) on all matters before the JSC, [***]. Should the JSC not be able to reach agreement with respect to a matter at a duly called meeting of the JSC, either Party may refer such matter to the Executive Officers for resolution, and the Executive Officers will attempt to resolve the matter in good faith. If the Executive Officers fail to resolve such matter within [***] after the date on which the matter is referred to the Executive Officers (unless a longer period is agreed to by the Parties), then the Executive Officer of Ideaya shall have final decision-making authority on all matters relating to the Development, Manufacture or Commercialization of the Licensed Compound and Licensed Products. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained herein, neither the JSC nor a Party through exercise of its final decision-making authority will have the right or authority to amend or waive any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or otherwise determine any matter outside the authority of the JSC or that expressly requires mutual agreement of the Parties under this Agreement, or to increase or materially change the other Party’s obligations under this Agreement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Decision-Making; Escalation to Senior Officers

  • Annual Statement as to Compliance, Notice of Servicer Termination Event (a) To the extent required by Section 1123 of Regulation AB, the Servicer, shall deliver to the Trustee, the Owner Trustee, the Trust Collateral Agent and each Rating Agency, on or before March 31 (or 90 days after the end of the Issuer’s fiscal year, if other than December 31) of each year (regardless of whether the Seller has ceased filing reports under the Exchange Act), beginning on March 31, 2019, an officer’s certificate signed by any Responsible Officer of the Servicer, dated as of December 31 of the previous calendar year, stating that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year (or such other period as shall have elapsed from the Closing Date to the date of the first such certificate) and of its performance under this Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision, and (ii) to such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all material respects all its obligations under this Agreement throughout such period, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, identifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status of such failure.

  • Coordination of Benefits The coordination of benefits (COB) provision applies when a Member has health care coverage under more than one plan. Plan is defined below. The order of benefit determination rules govern the order in which each plan will pay a claim for benefits. The plan that pays first is called the primary plan. The primary plan must pay benefits according to its policy terms without regard to the possibility that another plan may cover some expenses. The plan that pays after the primary plan is the secondary plan. In no event will a secondary plan be required to pay an amount in excess of its maximum benefit plus accrued savings. If the Member is covered by more than one health benefit plan, and the Member does not know which is the primary plan, the Member or the Member’s provider should contact any one of the health plans to verify which plan is primary. The health plan the Member contacts is responsible for working with the other plan to determine which is primary and will let the Member know within 30 calendar days. All health plans have timely claim filing requirements. If the Member or the Member’s provider fails to submit the Member’s claim to a secondary health plan within that plan’s claim filing time limit, the plan can deny the claim. If the Member experiences delays in the processing of the claim by the primary health plan, the Member or the Member’s provider will need to submit the claim to the secondary health plan within its claim filing time limit to prevent a denial of the claim. If the Member is covered by more than one health benefit plan, the Member or the Member’s provider should file all the Member’s claims with each plan at the same time. If Medicare is the Member’s primary plan, Medicare may submit the Member’s claims to the Member’s secondary carrier.

  • Decision-Making The JDC shall act by consensus. The representatives from each Party will have, collectively, one (1) vote on behalf of that Party. If the JDC cannot reach consensus on an issue that comes before the JDC and over which the JDC has oversight, then the Parties shall refer such matter to the JSC for resolution in accordance with Sections 2.2(e) and 2.6(b).

  • Third Party Administrators for Defined Contribution Plans 2.1 The Fund may decide to make available to certain of its customers, a qualified plan program (the “Program”) pursuant to which the customers (“Employers”) may adopt certain plans of deferred compensation (“Plan or Plans”) for the benefit of the individual Plan participant (the “Plan Participant”), such Plan(s) being qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code and administered by TPAs which may be plan administrators as defined in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

  • Period for Review and Consideration of Agreement Employee understands that Employee has been given a period of twenty-one (21) days to review and consider this Agreement before signing it. Employee further understands that Employee may use as much of this 21-day period as Employee wishes prior to signing.

  • Selection and Payment of Appeal Panel In the event an Appellant delivers an Appeal Notice to the Appellee (together with proof of payment of the applicable bond) in compliance with the provisions of Paragraph 5.1 above, the Appeal will be heard by a three (3) person arbitration panel (the “Appeal Panel”).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!