DERIVATION OF THE AD OPTION PRICING FORMULA Sample Clauses

DERIVATION OF THE AD OPTION PRICING FORMULA. ‌ Since the proposed ad option complements the existing keyword auctions, there may exist a situation that some advertisers only want to make guaranteed profits from the difference of costs between option and auction markets without taking any risk. This situation is called arbitrage [Varian 1987; Bjo¨rk 2009]. Hence, we must fairly evaluate the option so that arbitrage is eliminated. ∈ In the context of sponsored search, we consider that an advertiser buys a n-keyword m-click ad option at time 0. Then at time t, t [0, T ], the difference between the option value and the market value of candidate keywords can be expressed as Σ Π(t) = V (t, C(t); F , T, m) − ψi(t)Ci(t), (19)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DERIVATION OF THE AD OPTION PRICING FORMULA. Since the proposed ad option complements the existing keyword auctions, there may exist a situation that some advertisers want to make guaranteed profits only from the difference of costs between option and auction markets without taking any risk. This situation is called arbitrage [Varian 1987; Bjo¨rk 2009]. Hence, we must fairly evaluate the option so that arbitrage is eliminated. ∈ In the context of sponsored search, we consider that an advertiser buys an n-keyword m-click ad option at time 0. Then, at time t, t [0, T ], the difference between the option value and the market value of candidate keywords can be expressed as n П(t) = V (t, C(t); F, T, m) — ψi(t)Ci(t), (19) . = where ψi(t) represents the number of clicks needed for the keyword Ki such that i ψi(t) m. Here, we call П(t) the value difference process. Recall that, in Equation (3), we consider the value of an n-keyword m-click option as the sum of m independent n- keyword 1-click options; for mathematical convenience, Equation (19) can be rewritten as follows: П(t) =m V (t, C(t); F, T, 1) — i=1 ∆iCi(t) , (20) . where ∆i represents the probability that a single click goes for the keyword Ki and n i=1 ∆i = 1. The changes of П over a sufficient small period of time dt is then n n n n dП(t) = m⎝ ∂t dt + 2 σiσjρijCiCj ∂Ci∂Cj dt + ∂Ci dCi — ∆idCi⎠ . (21) ⎛ ∂V ∂2V ∂V ⎞ i=1 i=1 = i=1 j=1 The uncertain components in dП(t) can be removed if ∆i ∂V /∂Ci. This is called delta hedging in option pricing theory [Xxxxxxx 2006]. Hence, П(t) now becomes a riskless process over time: n n dП(t) = m⎝ ∂t + 2 σiσjρijCiCj ∂Ci∂Cj ⎠ dt. (22) ⎛ ∂V 1 ∂2V ⎞ i=1 j=1 ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. 7, No. 1, Article 5, Publication date: October 2015.

Related to DERIVATION OF THE AD OPTION PRICING FORMULA

  • Adjustment of Number of Common Shares and Exercise Price The subscription rights in effect under the Warrants for Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants shall be subject to adjustment from time to time as follows:

  • PRICING for Markup of Non-Prepriced Items in RS Means Unit Price Book What is your proposed Markup Percentage on materials not found in the RS Means Price Book? If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and mark them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials.

  • METHOD OF AWARD AND PROCEDURE FOR AWARDING A SOW AGREEMENT 5.1. Contractor selection, or the determination to terminate the SOW-RFP without award, shall be done in the best interest of the State.

  • Selection of Option (a) The Employer will advise the employee of his or her years of continuous employment no later than three (3) months following the official date of signing of the collective agreement.

  • Separation of Components The SOFTWARE PRODUCT is licensed as a single product. Its component parts may not be separated for use on more than one computer.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • ADJUSTMENT/APPROPRIATION OF PAYMENTS The Allottee authorizes the Promoter to adjust/appropriate all payments made by him/her under any head(s) of dues against lawful outstanding, if any, in his/her name as the Promoter may in its sole discretion deem fit and the Allottee undertakes not to object/demand/direct the Promoter to adjust his payments in any manner.

  • EVALUATION OF OPTIONS The County shall evaluate bids for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price of the basic period. However, the evaluation of options shall not obligate the County to exercise the option(s).

  • Emergency Action on Imports of Particular Products Where any product is being imported in such increased quantities and under such conditions as to cause, or threaten to cause:

  • Loss Mitigation and Consideration of Alternatives (i) For each Single Family Shared-Loss Loan in default or for which a default is reasonably foreseeable, the Assuming Institution shall undertake reasonable and customary loss mitigation efforts, in accordance with any of the following programs selected by Assuming Institution in its sole discretion, Exhibit 5 (FDIC Mortgage Loan Modification Program), the United States Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program Guidelines or any other modification program approved by the United States Treasury Department, the Corporation, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any other governmental agency (it being understood that the Assuming Institution can select different programs for the various Single Family Shared-Loss Loans) (such program chosen, the “Modification Guidelines”). After selecting the applicable Modification Guideline for each such Single Family Shared-Loss Loan, the Assuming Institution shall document its consideration of foreclosure, loan restructuring under the applicable Modification Guideline chosen, and short-sale (if short-sale is a viable option) alternatives and shall select the alternative the Assuming Institution believes, based on its estimated calculations, will result in the least Loss. If unemployment or underemployment is the primary cause for default or for which a default is reasonably foreseeable, the Assuming Institution may consider the borrower for a temporary forbearance plan which reduces the loan payment to an affordable level for at least six (6) months.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!