EVALUATION OF OPTIONS. The County shall evaluate bids for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price of the basic period. However, the evaluation of options shall not obligate the County to exercise the option(s).
EVALUATION OF OPTIONS. The NAFI will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the NAFI to exercise the option(s).
EVALUATION OF OPTIONS. The IDIQ Contract resulting from this solicitation is intended to be a five-year ordering period without options. Task Orders will each specify a particular period of performance and may include options for additional periods of performance. Notwithstanding the lack of options on the IDIQ, the Government will include FAR clause 52.217-8 as part of the Contract award. Should the Government make use of FAR 52.217-8, it would have the ability to extend the Contract ordering period or any of the Task Orders’ periods of performance for up to six additional months. The prices for the six-month option shall be identical to the proposed pricing in the six months prior to expiration of the period of performance for each task. The total evaluated price will consist of the Contractor’s proposed prices for each of the Task Orders’ periods of performance including the pricing for the additional six-month period. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices or Task Order prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
EVALUATION OF OPTIONS. The County shall evaluate quotes for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price of the basic period. However, the evaluation of options shall not obligate the County to exercise the option(s).
EVALUATION OF OPTIONS. As prescribed in 17.208(c), insert a provision substantially the same as the following: Except when it is determined in accord- ance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Gov- ernment’s best interests, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Eval- uation of options will not obligate the Gov- ernment to exercise the option(s). [53 FR 17860, May 18, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 25532, June 21, 1990; 69 FR 59704, Oct. 5, 2004]
EVALUATION OF OPTIONS. 23 To arrive at the selection of the various solutions outlined, a dedicated project team was 24 formed in 2015 to further understand business processes, assess current IT systems, and 25 identify functional and technical requirements. This assessment was undertaken and funded by
EVALUATION OF OPTIONS. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
EVALUATION OF OPTIONS. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
M.2.4.4 Unbalanced Pricing
EVALUATION OF OPTIONS. The Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall evaluate options for improving the quality of information avail- able to the Federal Aviation Administration on airfield pavement conditions for airports that are part of the national air transportation system, including—
(1) improving the existing runway condition infor- mation contained in the airport safety data program by reviewing and revising rating criteria and provid- ing increased training for inspectors;
(2) requiring such airports to submit pavement condition index information as part of their airport master plan or as support in applications for airport improvement grants; and
(3) requiring all such airports to submit pavement condition index information on a regular basis and using this information to create a pavement condi- tion database that could be used in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of project applications and fore- casting anticipated pavement needs.
EVALUATION OF OPTIONS. The General Partners, in consultation with each other, will evaluate the options available to the Venture and the General Partners (including their respective Affiliates) under the FCC C-Block Order. Each General Partner (or its Affiliates) may determine the actions that will be taken with respect to their C-Block FCC licenses, provided that such actions with respect to the PCS licenses in the Designated BTAs shall be in the best interests of the Venture. In evaluating the options under the FCC C-Block Order to determine what action, if any, is in the best interest of the Venture, it shall be the goal of the parties to reduce the overall cost of the C-Block FCC licenses to the Venture while at the same time assuring that the Venture will have sufficient spectrum (initially not less than 10 Mhz, but with a view of attaining at least 20 Mhz in each Designated BTA (excluding Reading, where the goal will be to obtain at least 15 Mhz)) to permit the efficient and effective operation of the PCS system in the Designated BTAs. The option chosen may be based upon a risk/reward analysis of the available options, including the option of returning a license in a Designated BTA to the FCC, coupled with the prospect of re-acquiring such license, in accordance with FCC rules. and regulations, in a subsequent re-auction of such license.
