Common use of Design Reviews Clause in Contracts

Design Reviews. ‌ Except as mutually agreed upon by Developer and IFA, all Design Reviews shall be conducted in the Project Office. IFA will provide Xxxxx 0, Xxxxx 0 where applicable, RFC, and Final Design Design Reviews. Each of the Design Reviews (for each stage of design development) will consist of three phases. • Phase 1 shall consist of informal, brief presentations (sometimes known as over-the- shoulder reviews) during the development of design at the review office by the Responsible Engineer of the Design Unit being reviewed and the other Developer staff. The presentations shall include an explanation of what component(s) are being reviewed, highlighting any critical points or other information that may be of particular interest to the review participants. • Phase 2 shall be a period of more detailed review by the review participants. For minor items with little complexity, and although it is expected that most Phase 2 reviews will take place in the Project Office, Phase 2 shall, as necessary, provide for review participants to take the review package to their own offices for further examination, particularly for complex and, sensitive features. During this period, reviewers are encouraged to contact or meet with the Responsible Engineer to gain further understanding of the design intent of discuss the reviewers issues. The length of Phase 2 shall be consistent with the durations agreed to at the design workshop or as subsequently agreed to in writing. IFA’s Phase 2 written comments, if any, shall be provided to Developer through a design requirement verification report and within the periods specified in the PPA or as agreed to during the Design Workshop. All IFA design requirement verification observations shall be viewable to the Developer’s staff through the IFA’s requirement verification database application. Developer’s design staff shall be required to respond to all IFA observations related to design non-conformances or Design Requirements not being realized through the IFA’s requirement verification database application. • Phase 3 shall consist of review participants meeting face to face with the Responsible Engineer and other members of Developer’s staff to present and resolve comments from review participants. All IFA detected issues shall be appropriately resolved within the IFA’s requirement verification database application. Phase 3 face to face comment resolution meetings may be waived as mutually agreed between Developer and IFA but any waiver of this meeting by IFA does not release Developer from appropriately resolving the IFA detected issues within IFA’s requirement verification database application.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: www.state.in.us

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Design Reviews. ‌ Except as mutually agreed upon by Developer and IFA, all Design Reviews shall be conducted in the Project Office. IFA will provide Xxxxx 0, Xxxxx 0 where applicable, RFC, and Final Design Design Reviews. Each of the Design Reviews (for each stage of design development) will consist of three phases. Phase 1 shall consist of informal, brief presentations (sometimes known as over-the- shoulder reviews) during the development of design at the review office by the Responsible Engineer of the Design Unit being reviewed and the other Developer staff. The presentations shall include an explanation of what component(s) are being reviewed, highlighting any critical points or other information that may be of particular interest to the review participants. Phase 2 shall be a period of more detailed review by the review participants. For minor items with little complexity, and although it is expected that most Phase 2 reviews will take place in the Project Office, Phase 2 shall, as necessary, provide for review participants to take the review package to their own offices for further examination, particularly for complex and, sensitive features. During this period, reviewers are encouraged to contact or meet with the Responsible Engineer to gain further understanding of the design intent of discuss the reviewers issues. The length of Phase 2 shall be consistent with the durations agreed to at the design workshop or as subsequently agreed to in writing. IFA’s IFA‘s Phase 2 written comments, if any, shall be provided to Developer through a design requirement verification report and within the periods specified in the PPA or as agreed to during the Design Workshop. All IFA design requirement verification observations shall be viewable to the Developer’s staff through the IFA’s requirement verification database application. Developer’s design staff shall be required to respond to all IFA observations related to design non-conformances or Design Requirements not being realized through the IFA’s requirement verification database application. • Phase 3 shall consist of review participants meeting face to face with the Responsible Engineer and other members of Developer’s Developer‘s staff to present and resolve comments from review participants. All IFA detected issues shall be appropriately resolved within the IFA’s requirement verification database application. Phase 3 face to face comment resolution meetings may be waived as mutually agreed between Developer and IFA but any waiver of this meeting by IFA does not release Developer from appropriately resolving the IFA detected issues within IFA’s requirement verification database application.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: secure.in.gov

Design Reviews. ‌ Except as mutually agreed upon by Developer and IFA, all Design Reviews shall be conducted in the Project Office. IFA will provide Xxxxx 0, Xxxxx 0 where applicable, RFC, and Final Design Design Reviews. Each of the Design Reviews (for each stage of design development) will consist of three phases. Phase 1 shall consist of informal, brief presentations (sometimes known as over-the- shoulder reviews) during the development of design at the review office by the Responsible Engineer of the Design Unit being reviewed and the other Developer staff. The presentations shall include an explanation of what component(s) are being reviewed, highlighting any critical points or other information that may be of particular interest to the review participants. Phase 2 shall be a period of more detailed review by the review participants. For minor items with little complexity, and although it is expected that most Phase 2 reviews will take place in the Project Office, Phase 2 shall, as necessary, provide for review participants to take the review package to their own offices for further examination, particularly for complex and, sensitive features. During this period, reviewers are encouraged to contact or meet with the Responsible Engineer to gain further understanding of the design intent of discuss the reviewers issues. The length of Phase 2 shall be consistent with the durations agreed to at the design workshop or as subsequently agreed to in writing. IFA’s Phase 2 written comments, if any, shall be provided to Developer through a design requirement verification report and within the periods specified in the PPA or as agreed to during the Design Workshop. All IFA design requirement verification observations shall be viewable to the Developer’s staff through the IFA’s requirement verification database application. Developer’s design staff shall be required to respond to all IFA observations related to design non-conformances or Design Requirements not being realized through the IFA’s requirement verification database application. Phase 3 shall consist of review participants meeting face to face with the Responsible Engineer and other members of Developer’s staff to present and resolve comments from review participants. All IFA detected issues shall be appropriately resolved within the IFA’s requirement verification database application. Phase 3 face to face comment resolution meetings may be waived as mutually agreed between Developer and IFA but any waiver of this meeting by IFA does not release Developer from appropriately resolving the IFA detected issues within IFA’s requirement verification database application.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: www.in.gov

Design Reviews. ‌ Except as mutually agreed upon by Developer and IFA, all Design Reviews shall be conducted in the Project Office. IFA will provide Xxxxx 0, Xxxxx 0 where applicable, RFC, and Final Design Design Reviews. Each of the Design Reviews (for each stage of design development) will consist of three phases. Phase 1 shall consist of informal, brief presentations (sometimes known as over-the- shoulder reviews) during the development of design at the review office by the Responsible Engineer of the Design Unit being reviewed and the other Developer staff. The presentations shall include an explanation of what component(s) are being reviewed, highlighting any critical points or other information that may be of particular interest to the review participants. Phase 2 shall be a period of more detailed review by the review participants. For minor items with little complexity, and although it is expected that most Phase 2 reviews will take place in the Project Office, Phase 2 shall, as necessary, provide for review participants to take the review package to their own offices for further examination, particularly for complex and, sensitive features. During this period, reviewers are encouraged to contact or meet with the Responsible Engineer to gain further understanding of the design intent of discuss the reviewers issues. The length of Phase 2 shall be consistent with the durations agreed to at the design workshop or as subsequently agreed to in writing. IFA’s Phase 2 written comments, if any, shall be provided to Developer through a design requirement verification report and within the periods specified in the PPA or as agreed to during the Design Workshop. All IFA design requirement verification observations shall be viewable to the Developer’s staff through the IFA’s requirement verification database application. Developer’s design staff shall be required to respond to all IFA observations related to design non-conformances or Design Requirements not being realized through the IFA’s requirement verification database application. • Phase 3 shall consist of review participants meeting face to face with the Responsible Engineer and other members of Developer’s staff to present and resolve comments from review participants. All IFA detected issues shall be appropriately resolved within the IFA’s requirement verification database application. Phase 3 face to face comment resolution meetings may be waived as mutually agreed between Developer and IFA but any waiver of this meeting by IFA does not release Developer from appropriately resolving the IFA detected issues within IFA’s requirement verification database application.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: www.in.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Design Reviews. ‌ Except as mutually agreed upon by Developer Xxxxxxxxx and IFA, all Design Reviews shall be conducted in the Project Office. IFA will provide Xxxxx 0, Xxxxx 0 where applicable, RFC, and Final Design Design Reviews. Each of the Design Reviews (for each stage of design development) will consist of three phases. Phase 1 shall consist of informal, brief presentations (sometimes known as over-the- shoulder reviews) during the development of design at the review office by the Responsible Engineer of the Design Unit being reviewed and the other Developer staff. The presentations shall include an explanation of what component(s) are being reviewed, highlighting any critical points or other information that may be of particular interest to the review participants. Phase 2 shall be a period of more detailed review by the review participants. For minor items with little complexity, and although it is expected that most Phase 2 reviews will take place in the Project Office, Phase 2 shall, as necessary, provide for review participants to take the review package to their own offices for further examination, particularly for complex and, sensitive features. During this period, reviewers are encouraged to contact or meet with the Responsible Engineer to gain further understanding of the design intent of discuss the reviewers issues. The length of Phase 2 shall be consistent with the durations agreed to at the design workshop or as subsequently agreed to in writing. IFA’s Phase 2 written comments, if any, shall be provided to Developer through a design requirement verification report and within the periods specified in the PPA or as agreed to during the Design Workshop. All IFA design requirement verification observations shall be viewable to the Developer’s staff through the IFA’s requirement verification database application. Developer’s design staff shall be required to respond to all IFA observations related to design non-conformances or Design Requirements not being realized through the IFA’s requirement verification database application. Phase 3 shall consist of review participants meeting face to face with the Responsible Engineer and other members of Developer’s staff to present and resolve comments from review participants. All IFA detected issues shall be appropriately resolved within the IFA’s requirement verification database application. Phase 3 face to face comment resolution meetings may be waived as mutually agreed between Developer and IFA but any waiver of this meeting by IFA does not release Developer from appropriately resolving the IFA detected issues within IFA’s requirement verification database application.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: www.in.gov

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.