Dispute Regarding Workweeks Sample Clauses

Dispute Regarding Workweeks. Class Members and PAGA Group Members will have 18 an opportunity to dispute the number of Workweeks credited to each of them for the Class Period and/or 19 PAGA Period (if applicable), as reflected in their respective Class Notices. In order to dispute 20 Workweeks, Class Members and PAGA Group Members must submit a written letter to the Settlement 21 Administrator that: (a) contains the case name and number of the Action; (b) contains the full name, 22 signature, address, telephone number, and last four (4) digits of the Social Security Number of the 23 disputing individual; (c) clearly states that the dispute Class Member and/or PAGA Member disputes 24 the number of Workweeks credited to him or her during the Class Period and/or PAGA period and states 25 what number(s) of Workweeks he or she contends should be credited to him or her for the Class and/or 26 PAGA Period; (d) includes information and/or attaches documentation demonstrating that the number 27 of Workweeks that he or she contends should be credited to him or her for the Class Period and/or 28 PAGA Period; and (e) is returned by mail to the Settlement Administrator at the specified address, 1 postmarked on or before the Response Deadline. The date of the postmark on the mailing envelope will 2 be the exclusive means to determine whether a dispute has been timely submitted. Absent information 3 and/or documentation demonstrating that Defendant’s records and data are inaccurate as they pertain to 4 the number of Workweeks to be credited to a disputing Class Member and/or PAGA Member, 5 Defendant’s records will be presumed correct and determinative of the dispute. However, if a Class 6 Member and/or PAGA Member produces information and/or documents demonstrating that 7 Defendant’s records and data are inaccurate as they pertain to the number of Workweeks to be credited 8 to said individual for the Class Period and/or PAGA Period, the Settlement Administrator will evaluate 9 the materials submitted by said individual and the Settlement Administrator will resolve and determine 10 the number of Workweeks that said individual should be credited with for the Class Period and/or PAGA 11 Period, under the Settlement. The Settlement Administrator shall make an initial determination on all 12 Workweeks disputes, however, the Court shall have the right to review any decision made by the 13 Settlement Administrator on such disputes; to this end, the Settlement Administrator’s declaration filed 14 with the C...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Dispute Regarding Workweeks. Class Members will have an opportunity to dispute the 3 number of Workweeks to which they have been credited, as reflected in their respective Notices. In
Sample 1
Dispute Regarding Workweeks. Class Members will have an opportunity to dispute the 17 number of Workweeks to which they have been credited, as reflected in their respective Class Notices. 18 In order to dispute Workweeks, Class Members must submit a written letter to the Settlement 19 Administrator that: (a) includes the case name and number of the Action; (b) includes the full name, 20 signature, address, telephone number, and last four (4) digits of the Social Security Number of the 21 disputing Class Member; (c) clearly states that the Class Member disputes the number of Workweeks 22 credited to him or her and what he or she contends is the correct number to be credited to him or her;
Sample 1

Related to Dispute Regarding Workweeks

  • Customer Service, Dispute Resolution If you have a question about your XOOM charges or service you may contact XOOM directly by calling 0-000-000-0000 Monday – Friday 8 (eight) a.m. to 11 (eleven)p.m.

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Limitations This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. TIPS, a department of Region 8 Education Service Center, a political subdivision, and local government entity of the State of Texas, does not agree to binding arbitration as a remedy to dispute and no such provision shall be permitted in this Agreement with TIPS. Vendor agrees that any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement, except those specifically and expressly waived or negotiated within this Agreement, may be subject to non-binding mediation at the request of either party to be conducted by a mutually agreed upon mediator as prerequisite to the filing of any lawsuit arising out of or related to this Agreement. Mediation shall be held in either Camp or Titus County, Texas. Agreements reached in mediation will be subject to the approval by the Region 8 ESC's Board of Directors, authorized signature of the Parties if approved by the Board of Directors, and, once approved by the Board of Directors and properly signed, shall thereafter be enforceable as provided by the laws of the State of Texas. Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees No Waiver of TIPS Immunity This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Vendor agrees that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of sovereign or government immunity; nor constitute or be construed as a waiver of any of the privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department. The failure to enforce, or any delay in the enforcement, of any privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department under this Agreement or under applicable law shall not constitute a waiver of such privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities or be considered as a basis for estoppel. 5 Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees

  • Negotiation; Alternative Dispute Resolution The Parties will attempt in good faith to resolve any dispute or controversy arising out of or relating to the performance of services under this Agreement. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute, then, pursuant to San Francisco Administrative Code Section 21.36, Contractor may submit to the Contracting Officer a written request for administrative review and documentation of the Contractor's claim(s). Upon such request, the Contracting Officer shall promptly issue an administrative decision in writing, stating the reasons for the action taken and informing the Contractor of its right to judicial review. If agreed by both Parties in writing, disputes may be resolved by a mutually agreed-upon alternative dispute resolution process. If the parties do not mutually agree to an alternative dispute resolution process or such efforts do not resolve the dispute, then either Party may pursue any remedy available under California law. The status of any dispute or controversy notwithstanding, Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance of its obligations under this Agreement in accordance with the Agreement and the written directions of the City. Neither Party will be entitled to legal fees or costs for matters resolved under this section.

  • Dispute Resolution All or any disputes arising out or touching upon or in relation to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including the interpretation and validity of the terms thereof and the respective rights and obligations of the Parties, shall be settled amicably by mutual discussion, failing which the same shall be settled through the adjudicating officer appointed under the Act.

  • Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Registry Operator will comply with the following dispute resolution mechanisms as they may be revised from time to time:

  • GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE 8.01 The parties to this agreement believe it is important to adjust complaints and grievances as quickly as possible as provided for herein. The employee or Union shall first discuss any individual complaint informally with the Director of Care or designate at the first opportunity.

  • Informal Dispute Resolution Process 1. In the event there is a dispute under this Centralized Contract, the Contractor, OGS and Authorized User agree to exercise their best efforts to resolve the dispute as soon as possible. The Contractor, OGS and Authorized User shall, without delay, continue to perform their respective obligations under this Centralized Contract which are not affected by the dispute. Primary responsibility for resolving any dispute arising under this Centralized Contract shall rest with the Authorized User’s Contractor Coordinators and the Contractor’s Account Executive and the State & Local Government Regional General Manager.

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Prior to filing of litigation, the parties may select non-binding mediation as a method of conflict resolution for issues arising out of or relating to this procurement process or any contract resulting from or any contemplated transaction. The parties agree that if non-binding mediation is chosen as a resolution process, the parties must agree to the chosen mediator(s) and that all mediation venue shall be at a location in Xxx Xxxxx County, Texas or agreed by the parties. The parties agree to share equally the cost of the mediation process and venue cost.

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Process Owner may establish a dispute resolution process to be utilized in advance of that outlined in Tex. Gov’t Code, Chapter 2260.

  • Informal Dispute Resolution Prior to the initiation of formal dispute resolution procedures, the Parties shall first attempt to resolve their Dispute informally, in a timely and cost-effective manner, as follows:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.