Common use of Disputes Involving Safety Issues Clause in Contracts

Disputes Involving Safety Issues. STEP 1. When an employee or SEIU in good faith believes that an employee or employees are being required to work where a clear and present danger exists, the immediate supervisor will be notified. The supervisor will immediately investigate the allegation. The supervisor may check with a higher level of management or a departmental safety coordinator and thereafter direct the employee to either temporally perform other duties or proclaim the situation safe and direct the employee to proceed with assigned duties. If the employee or SEIU continues to believe their condition presents a clear and present danger, the employee or SEIU may proceed to STEP 2. If the employee believes there is an imminent danger the employee may proceed directly to STEP 3. STEP 2. When an employee or SEIU is not satisfied with the decision at STEP 1, the employee or SEIU may submit the issues to the Court Executive Officer. The Court Executive Officer or designee shall issue a written response to the alleged clear and present danger within five (5) calendar days after receipt of the request to review the issue. STEP 3. If the employee or SEIU is not satisfied with the decision rendered by the Court Executive Officer or designee, or where the employee believes there is an imminent danger, the issues may be submitted to the Safety Committee which shall be comprised of two (2) management designee appointed by the Court Executive Officer, two (2) union designee appointed by the union and a departmental employee appointed by the union and the court by mutual agreement. Within five (5) calendar days the Safety Committee shall respond in writing with a recommendation(s) for the Court Executive Officer to consider in resolving the issue. The Court Executive Officer shall seriously consider the recommendations of the Safety Committee. In the event the Court Executive Officer decides not to implement either of the suggestions from the Committee, the employee is entitled to request and receive a written response from the Court Executive Officer outlining the reasons for declining the suggestions and specifying an alternative solution.

Disputes Involving Safety Issues. ‌ STEP 1. When an employee or SEIU in good faith believes that an employee or employees are being required to work where a clear and present danger exists, the immediate supervisor will be notified. The supervisor will immediately investigate the allegation. The supervisor may check with a higher level of management or a departmental safety coordinator and thereafter direct the employee to either temporally temporarily perform other duties or proclaim the situation safe and direct the employee to proceed with assigned duties. If the employee or SEIU continues to believe their the condition presents a clear and present danger, the employee or SEIU may proceed to STEP 2. If the employee believes there is an imminent danger the employee may proceed directly to STEP 3. STEP 2. When an employee or SEIU is not satisfied with the decision at STEP 1, the employee or SEIU may submit the issues to the Court Executive Officer. The Court Executive Officer or designee shall issue a written response to the alleged clear and present danger within five (5) calendar days after receipt of the request to review the issue. STEP 3. If the employee or SEIU is not satisfied with the decision rendered by the Court Executive Officer or designee, or where the employee believes there is an imminent danger, the issues may be submitted to the Safety Committee which shall be comprised of two (2) management designee appointed by the Court Executive Officer, two (2) union designee appointed by the union and a departmental employee appointed by the union and the court by mutual agreement. Within five (5) calendar days the Safety Committee shall respond in writing with a recommendation(s) for the Court Executive Officer to consider in resolving the issue. The Court Executive Officer shall seriously consider the recommendations of the Safety Committee. In the event the Court Executive Officer decides not to implement either of the suggestions from the Committee, the employee is entitled to request and receive a written response from the Court Executive Officer outlining the reasons for declining the suggestions and specifying an alternative solution.

Disputes Involving Safety Issues. ‌ STEP 1. When an employee or SEIU in good faith believes that an employee or employees are being required to work where a clear and present danger exists, the immediate supervisor will be notified. The supervisor will immediately investigate the allegation. The supervisor may check with a higher level of management or a departmental safety coordinator and thereafter direct the employee to either temporally perform other duties or proclaim the situation safe and direct the employee to proceed with assigned duties. If the employee or SEIU continues to believe their condition presents a clear and present danger, the employee or SEIU may proceed to STEP 2. If the employee believes there is an imminent danger the employee may proceed directly to STEP 3. STEP 2. When an employee or SEIU is not satisfied with the decision at STEP 1, the employee or SEIU may submit the issues to the Court Executive Officer. The Court Executive Officer or designee shall issue a written response to the alleged clear and present danger within five (5) calendar days after receipt of the request to review the issue. STEP 3. If the employee or SEIU is not satisfied with the decision rendered by the Court Executive Officer or designee, or where the employee believes there is an imminent danger, the issues may be submitted to the Safety Committee which shall be comprised of two (2) management designee appointed by the Court Executive Officer, two (2) union designee appointed by the union and a departmental employee appointed by the union and the court by mutual agreement. Within five (5) calendar days the Safety Committee shall respond in writing with a recommendation(s) for the Court Executive Officer to consider in resolving the issue. The Court Executive Officer shall seriously consider the recommendations of the Safety Committee. In the event the Court Executive Officer decides not to implement either of the suggestions from the Committee, the employee is entitled to request and receive a written response from the Court Executive Officer outlining the reasons for declining the suggestions and specifying an alternative solution.

Disputes Involving Safety Issues. STEP 1. When an employee or SEIU in good faith believes that an employee or employees are being required to work where a clear and present danger exists, the immediate supervisor will be notified. The supervisor will immediately investigate the allegation. The supervisor may check with a higher level of management or a departmental safety coordinator and thereafter direct the employee to either temporally temporarily perform other duties or proclaim the situation safe and direct the employee to proceed with assigned duties. If the employee or SEIU continues to believe their the condition presents a clear and present danger, the employee or SEIU may proceed to STEP 2. If the employee believes there is an imminent danger the employee may proceed directly to STEP 3. STEP 2. When an employee or SEIU is not satisfied with the decision at STEP 1, the employee or SEIU may submit the issues to the Court Executive Officer. The Court Executive Officer or designee shall issue a written response to the alleged clear and present danger within five (5) calendar days after receipt of the request to review the issue. STEP 3. If the employee or SEIU is not satisfied with the decision rendered by the Court Executive Officer or designee, or where the employee believes there is an imminent danger, the issues may be submitted to the Safety Committee which shall be comprised of two (2) management designee appointed by the Court Executive Officer, two (2) union designee appointed by the union and a departmental employee appointed by the union and the court by mutual agreement. Within five (5) calendar days the Safety Committee shall respond in writing with a recommendation(s) for the Court Executive Officer to consider in resolving the issue. The Court Executive Officer shall seriously consider the recommendations of the Safety Committee. In the event the Court Executive Officer decides not to implement either of the suggestions from the Committee, the employee is entitled to request and receive a written response from the Court Executive Officer outlining the reasons for declining the suggestions and specifying an alternative solution.