Drug Utilization Review Sample Clauses

Drug Utilization Review. Compliance with Formularies and Provider ----------------------------------------------------------------- Manual. Provider shall (1) cooperate with ESI's procedures for drug ------ utilization review and generic substitution, as set forth from time to time in the Provider Manual; (2) comply with ESI's procedures for calling prescribers to facilitate generic substitution and Formulary compliance, and other programs established by a Sponsor; and (3) comply with the Provider Manual. Provider shall use commercially reasonable efforts to comply with the applicable Formulary when dispensing Covered Medications to Members. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in no event will Provider (i) attempt to switch a Member's prescription to a drug that is not a Formulary drug on the applicable Formulary, except for generic substitution opportunities or where required by medical necessity. Provider agrees that ESI's manufacturer agreements, therapeutic programs and formularies take precedence with the manufacturers over any such agreements or programs to which Provider is a party with respect to Covered Medications dispensed to Members. Provider will not implement any substitution program for Members of Prescription Drug Programs that is inconsistent with such Prescription Drug Program, including the applicable Formulary.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Drug Utilization Review. The Health Plan shall design and implement a drug utilization review (DUR) program designed to encourage coordination between an enrollee’s primary care physician and a prescriber of a psychotropic or similar prescription drug for behavioral health problems. The Health Plan’s DUR program shall identify those medications for other serious medical conditions (such as hypertension, diabetes, neurological disorders, or cardiac problems), where this is a significant risk to the enrollee posed by potential drug interactions between drugs for these conditions and behavioral-related drugs. After the WellCare of Florida, Inc., Medicaid HMO Non-Reform Contract Health Plan identifies the potential for such problems, the Health Plan’s DUR program shall notify all related prescribers that certain drugs may be contra-indicated due to the potential for drug interactions and shall encourage the prescribers to coordinate their care. Notice may be provided electronically or via mail, or by telephonic or direct consultation, as the Health Plan deems appropriate.
Drug Utilization Review. Benecard will review both concurrently and retrospectively Claims for potential fraud, waste, abuse, and clinical appropriateness. Claims are reviewed daily from the previous day to ensure such Claims are being prescribed based on clinically appropriate and FDA approved guidelines, including but not limited to, duplicate therapy, refill too soon, gender appropriate, age appropriate, cost and quantities. Fraud, waste and abuse Claims are also reviewed retrospectively each calendar quarter, reported and tracked until resolution of the case is completed and when applicable, notified to the Group.
Drug Utilization Review. Both parties agree to maintain and participate in, the Drug Utilization Management Program. This program shall be administered in accordance with applicable Benefit Program requirements and shall include medication therapy management programs.
Drug Utilization Review. Xxxxx will provide concurrent drug utilization review services through edits applied during Claims Processing in order to assist the dispensing pharmacist and prescribing physician in identifying potential drug interactions, incorrect prescriptions or dosages, and certain other circumstances that may be indicative of inappropriate prescription drug usage. Xxxxx’x utilization review services are not intended to substitute for the professional judgment of the prescriber, the dispensing pharmacist or any other health care professional providing services to the Member. Client or its third party designee (as applicable) will have the final responsibility for all decisions with respect to coverage of a Claim and the benefits allowable under the Plan, including determining whether any rejected or disputed claim will be allowed.
Drug Utilization Review. The Health Plan shall design and implement a drug utilization review (DUR) program designed to encourage coordination between an enrollee’s primary care physician and a prescriber of a psychotropic or similar prescription drug for behavioral health problems. The Health Plan’s DUR program shall identify those medications for other serious medical conditions (such as hypertension, diabetes, neurological disorders, or cardiac problems), where this is a significant risk to the enrollee posed by potential drug interactions between drugs for these conditions and behavioral-related drugs. After the Health Plan identifies the potential for such problems, the Health Plan’s DUR program shall notify all related prescribers that certain drugs may be contra-indicated due to the potential for drug interactions and shall encourage the prescribers to coordinate their care. Notice may be provided electronically or via mail, or by telephonic or direct consultation, as the Health Plan deems appropriate. HealthEase of Florida, Inc. Medicaid HMO Non-Reform Contract 5. Outreach Program – The Health Plan shall have an outreach program including referral and other resources designed to assist PCPs in the identification, management and treatment of: a. Enrollees with severe and persistent mental illness; b. Children/adolescents with severe emotional disturbances; and c. Enrollees with clinical depression.
Drug Utilization Review. The Health Plan shall design and implement a drug utilization review (DUR) program designed to encourage coordination between an enrollee’s primary care physician and a prescriber of a psychotropic or similar prescription drug for behavioral health problems. The Health Plan’s DUR program shall identify those medications for other serious medical conditions (such as hypertension, diabetes, neurological disorders, or cardiac problems), where this is a significant risk to the enrollee posed by potential drug interactions between drugs for these conditions and behavioral-related drugs. After the Health Plan identifies the potential for such problems, the Health Plan’s DUR program shall notify all related prescribers that certain drugs may be contra-indicated due to the potential for drug interactions and shall encourage the prescribers to coordinate their care. Notice may be provided electronically or via mail, or by telephonic or direct consultation, as the Health Plan deems appropriate. WellCare of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Staywell Health Plan of Florida Medicaid HMO Non-Reform Contract 5. Outreach Program – The Health Plan shall have an outreach program including referral and other resources designed to assist PCPs in the identification, management and treatment of: a. Enrollees with severe and persistent mental illness; b. Children/adolescents with severe emotional disturbances; and c. Enrollees with clinical depression.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Drug Utilization Review. CHLIC shall perform a concurrent Drug Utilization Review (“DUR”) analysis of each prescription submitted for processing, which may include: (1) prescribed dosage within a safe range; (2) drug-to-drug interaction; (3) drug-to- allergy interaction; (4) age-to-drug interaction;

Related to Drug Utilization Review

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Midterm Review The Recipient shall: (a) carry out jointly with the Association, no later than 24 months after the Effective Date, a midterm review to assess the status of Project implementation, as measured against the performance indicators referred to in Section II.A.1 (a) of Schedule 2 to this Agreement. Such review shall include an assessment of the following: (i) overall progress in Project implementation; (ii) results of monitoring and evaluation activities; (iii) annual work plans and budgets;

  • Compliance Review During the Term, Developer agrees to permit the GLO, HUD, and/or a designated representative of the GLO or HUD to access the Property for the purpose of performing Compliance-Monitoring Procedures. In accordance with GLO Compliance-Monitoring Procedures, the GLO or HUD will periodically monitor and audit Developer’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement, the CDBG-DR Regulations, the CDBG Multifamily Rental Housing Guidelines, and any and all other Governmental Requirements during the Term. In conducting any compliance reviews, the GLO or HUD will rely primarily on information obtained from Developer’s records and reports, on-site monitoring, and audit reports. The GLO or HUD may also consider other relevant information gained from other sources, including litigation and citizen complaints. 5.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: INDEMNIFICATION (a) Developer agrees to the following. (i) Developer shall not receive, store, dispose, or release any Hazardous Materials on or to the Property; transport any Hazardous Materials to or from the Property; or permit the existence of any Hazardous Material contamination on the Property. (ii) Developer shall give written notice to the GLO immediately when Developer acquires knowledge of the presence of any Hazardous Material on the Property; the transport of any Hazardous Materials to or from the Property; or the existence of any Hazardous Material contamination on the Property, with a full description thereof. (iii) Developer will promptly, at Developer’s sole cost and expense, comply with any Governmental Requirements regarding the removal, treatment, or disposal of such Hazardous Materials or Hazardous Material contamination and provide the GLO with satisfactory evidence of such compliance. (iv) Developer shall provide the GLO, within thirty (30) days of demand by the GLO, financial assurance evidencing to the GLO that the necessary funds are available to pay for the cost of removing, treating, and disposing of such Hazardous Materials or Hazardous Material contamination and discharging any assessments that may be established on the Property as a result thereof. (v) Developer shall insure that all leases, licenses, and agreements of any kind (whether written or oral) now or hereafter executed that permit any party to occupy, possess, or use in any way the Property or any part thereof include an express prohibition on the disposal or discharge of any Hazardous Materials at the Property and a provision stating that failure to comply with such prohibition shall expressly constitute a default under any such agreement. (vi) Developer shall not cause or suffer any liens (including any so-called state, federal, or local “Superfund” lien relating to such matters) to be recorded against the Property as a consequence of, or in any way related to, the presence, remediation, or disposal of Hazardous Materials in or about the Property. (b) DEVELOPER SHALL, AT ALL TIMES, RETAIN ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE PRESENCE, HANDLING, TREATMENT, STORAGE, TRANSPORTATION, REMOVAL, OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ON THE PROPERTY. REGARDLESS OF WHETHER ANY EVENT OF DEFAULT OCCURS OR CONTINUES, WHETHER THE GLO EXERCISES ANY REMEDIES IN RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY, OR SUCH SITUATION RELATED TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WAS CAUSED BY OR WITHIN THE CONTROL OF DEVELOPER OR THE GLO, DEVELOPER SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE GLO AND ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND EMPLOYEES FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES, SUITS, ACTIONS, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, PENALTIES, DAMAGES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS, CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INTEREST, PENALTIES, FINES, AND MONETARY SANCTIONS), LOSSES, COSTS, AND EXPENSES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS) THAT MAY: (i) NOW OR IN THE FUTURE (WHETHER BEFORE OR AFTER THE CULMINATION OF THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT) BE INCURRED OR SUFFERED BY THE GLO BY REASON OF, RESULTING FROM, IN CONNECTION WITH, OR ARISING IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER FROM THE BREACH OF ANY WARRANTY OR COVENANT IN THIS SECTION OR THE INACCURACY OF ANY REPRESENTATION OF DEVELOPER IN RELATION TO THIS AGREEMENT;

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.

  • Program Compliance The School Board shall be responsible for monitoring the program to provide technical assistance and to ensure program compliance.

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!