Enforcement Process. Vendors are expected to abide by regulations established for the Market. The PTA may enforce said regulations. Vendors must follow Market managers’ directions.
Enforcement Process. Prior to commencing involvement in any such suit, action, or proceeding, the Party controlling the suit, action, or proceeding pertaining to enforcement of the Licensed Technology against a Product Infringement (the “Enforcing Party”) will notify the other party (the “Non-Enforcing Party”) and will consider the Non-Enforcing Party’s recommendations made within *** after such notice regarding the proposed suit, action, or proceeding, except to the extent imminent action is determined by Enforcing Party to be required or the delay could reasonably be expected to result in the loss of rights by the Non-Enforcing Party or the Enforcing Party or otherwise adversely affect or prejudice the Enforcing Party. The Enforcing Party will give the Non-Enforcing Party timely notice of any proposed settlement of any such suit, action, or proceeding that the Enforcing Party controls and the Enforcing Party will not settle, stipulate to any facts, or make any admission with respect to any Product Infringement without the Non-Enforcing Party’s prior written consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) if such settlement, stipulation, or admission would: (i) adversely affect the validity, enforceability, or scope, or admit non-infringement, of any of the Licensed Technology; (ii) give rise to liability of the Non-Enforcing Party or its Affiliates; or (iii) impair the Non-Enforcing Party’s or any of its Affiliates’ rights in any Licensed Technology or the Non-Enforcing Party’s or any of its Affiliates’ rights under this Agreement.
Enforcement Process. Any Person violating these Rules and Regulations is subject to being (1) charged with a minor misdemeanor in accordance with the provisions of Section 4582.99 of the Ohio Revised Code; (2) charged with a violation of the applicable criminal codes; (3) fined in accordance with FAA regulations; and (4) subject to any other legal remedies that may be available to the Authority, or all of the above.
Enforcement Process. 23. On April 3, 2023, the Prosecution Team issued Administrative Civil Liability Complaint R9-2023-0015 to the City of Oceanside for the April 2020 SSOs to Buena Vista Creek, Buena Vista Lagoon, Pilgrim Creek, and Windmill Creek. The 9 See Enforcement Policy, Section VI.A, Step 4, Multiple Violations Resulting from the Same Incident, accessible at: xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx/board_decisions/adopted_orders/resolutions/2017/040417_9_fi nal%20adopted%20policy.pdf Prosecution Team proposed the San Diego Water Board impose civil liability against the City in the amount of $1,807,321 for the violations described in Paragraphs 20 and 21 above. The liability amount was calculated using the penalty calculation methodology described in the Enforcement Policy, with supporting details contained in Attachment A of Administrative Civil Liability Complaint R9-2023-0015. The penalty calculation was performed using an estimated BVLS discharge volume of 1,121,000 gallons10.
