Feeding of the ROW - Orphan Criteria Sample Clauses

Feeding of the ROW - Orphan Criteria. In compliance with the HLG guidelines for the definition of orphan works11, a work in ARROW is considered to be orphan if its rightholders can not be identified or, if identified, it is not possible to locate them. Moreover it has to be considered that an Orphan work is a work protected by copyright but the current owner is unknown or untraceable by diligent search, therefore works in the public domain are in principle not relevant for the scope of the ROW. Establishing if a work is orphan or not is not a simple and straightforward task but is the result of a diligent search for the rightholders, according to a procedure and methodology compliant with the principles contained in the HLG guidelines on diligent search. Such diligent search is supported by
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Feeding of the ROW - Orphan Criteria. In compliance with the HLEG guidelines for the definition of orphan works17, a work in ARROW is considered to be orphan if its rightholders can not be identified or, if identified, it is not possible to locate them. Moreover it has to be considered that an Orphan work is a work protected by copyright but the current owner is unknown or untraceable by diligent search, therefore works in the public domain are in principle not relevant for the scope of the ROW. Establishing if a work is orphan or not is not a simple and straightforward task but is the result of a diligent search for the rightholders, according to a procedure and methodology compliant with the principles contained in the HLEG guidelines on diligent search. Such diligent search is supported by the ARROW Rights Information Infrastructure (RII) that enables to search distributed sources of information to find out the rights status of a work and its rightholders18. As mentioned above, at the end of the RII workflow, each work is associated with a set of ARROW assertions on the work rights status: Copyright Status, Publishing Status and Orphan Status. The works that have an Orphan Status marked as “ProbablyOrphan” feed the ROW. The following table is an outline of the possible combinations of the ARROW assertions on the work rights status that lead to the inclusion of a specific work into the ROW. Copyright Status Publishing Status Orphan Status Inclusion in the ROW arrow:Copyright ARROW:CurrentlyActive ARROW:ProbablyOrphan YES
Sample 1

Related to Feeding of the ROW - Orphan Criteria

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Desirable Selection Criteria 1. Possession of, or significant progression toward the attainment of a post graduate qualification in area of specialty.

  • Program Objectives In performing its responsibilities with respect to the management and administration of the Program, each party shall be guided by the following Program objectives:

  • Program Objective The objectives of the Department’s grants are to:

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • Program Goals CalHFA MAC envisions that these monies would be used to complement other federal or lender programs designed specifically to stabilize communities by providing assistance to homeowners who have suffered a financial hardship and as a result are no longer financially able to afford their first-lien mortgage loan payments or their Property Expenses when associated with a Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (“HECM”) loan, only.

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • Promotional Criteria Subject to the utilisation of the skills, as required by the Employer, an employee remains at this level until he/she has developed the skills to allow the employee to effectively perform the tasks required of this function and is assessed to be competent to perform effectively at a higher level or has successfully completed appropriate training to ASF level 1 and has the demonstrated skills to perform at a higher level. An employee must be prepared to undertake appropriate training. LEVEL 3

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.