Common use of Final Evaluation Procedures Clause in Contracts

Final Evaluation Procedures. After completing formal (classroom) observations, informal (walkthroughs) observations, and pre and post-conferences with the teacher, the Evaluator will use the evidence collected to rate the teacher’s performance on standards. Each teacher’s performance rating will be combined with the assessment of student growth measures to produce the summative evaluation rating. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered in the previous school year and performance that is assessed during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year. The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. The evaluator shall note all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. The evaluation report shall be signed and dated by the evaluator. The evaluation report should then be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation will be placed on file, but the teacher's signature should not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. The evaluation report shall be completed by May 10th, signed by both parties with copies provide to the Superintendent and the teacher. The teacher shall have the right to make a written response to the evaluation and to have it attached to the evaluation report to be placed in the teacher's personnel file. A copy, signed by both parties, shall be provided to the teacher. At the conclusion of the evaluation process each teacher’s final performance rating of ineffective, developing, skilled or accomplished and the final growth measure ranking below expected growth, at expected growth or above expected growth will be entered into the electronic system, Ohio eTPES (Ohio electronic Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems). After the data is entered the eTPES will calculate the Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness the eTPES will be used to report teacher effectiveness ratings. Only the minimum requirements necessary to arrive at a Final Summative rating will be reported electronically to eTPES.

Final Evaluation Procedures. After completing formal (classroom) observations, informal (walkthroughs) observations, and pre and post-conferences with the teacher, the Evaluator will use the evidence collected to rate the teacher’s performance on standards. Each teacher’s performance rating will be combined with the assessment of student growth measures to produce the summative evaluation rating. , based upon the following “Evaluation Matrix”: Teacher Performance 4 3 2 1 Student Growth Measure Above Accomplished Accomplished Skilled Developing Expected Skilled Skilled Developing Developing Below Developing Developing Ineffective Ineffective The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered in the previous school year and performance that is assessed during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year. The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. The evaluator shall note all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. The evaluation report shall be signed and dated by the evaluator. The evaluation report should then be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation will be placed on file, but the teacher's signature should not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. The evaluation report shall be completed by May 10th, signed by both parties with copies provide parties, and sent to the Superintendent and the teacherSuperintendent. The teacher shall have the right to make a written response to the evaluation and to have it attached to the evaluation report to be placed in the teacher's personnel file. A copy, signed by both parties, shall part1ie4s,-MshEallD-03-0435 be provided to the teacher. 1505-01 At the conclusion of the evaluation process each teacher’s final performance rating of ineffective, inKef3fe1ct6iv0e,1 developing, skilled or accomplished and the final growth measure ranking below expected growth, at expected growth or above expected growth will be entered into the electronic system, Ohio eTPES (Ohio electronic Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems). After the data is entered the eTPES will calculate the Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness the eTPES will be used to report teacher effectiveness ratings. Only the minimum requirements necessary to arrive at a Final Summative rating will be reported electronically to eTPES.

Final Evaluation Procedures. After completing formal (classroom) observations, informal (walkthroughs) observations, and pre and post-conferences with the teacher, the Evaluator will use the evidence collected to rate the teacher’s performance on standards. Each teacher’s performance rating will be combined with the assessment of student growth measures to produce the summative evaluation rating. , based upon the following “Evaluation Matrix”: The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered in the previous school year (for category A or B teachers) or by SLO(s) for the current school year (for category C teachers) and performance that is assessed during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year. The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. The evaluator shall note all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation rubric report. The evaluation rubric report shall be signed and dated by the evaluator. The evaluation rubric report should then be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation will be placed on file, but the teacher's signature should not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. The teacher shall then be given a copy of the completed evaluation rubric report. The evaluation report shall be completed in eTPES by May 10th, signed by both parties with copies provide parties, and sent to the Superintendent and the teacherSuperintendent. The teacher shall have the right to make a written response to the evaluation and to have it attached to the evaluation report to be placed in the teacher's personnel file. A copycopy of the written response, signed by both parties, shall be provided to the teacher. At the conclusion of the evaluation process process, each teacher’s final performance rating of ineffective, developing, skilled or accomplished and the final growth measure ranking below expected growth, at expected growth or above expected growth will be entered into the electronic system, Ohio eTPES (Ohio electronic Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems). After the data is entered the entered, Ohio eTPES will calculate the Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness the Effectiveness. Ohio eTPES will be used to report teacher effectiveness ratings. Only the minimum requirements necessary to arrive at a Final Summative rating Rating of Teacher Effectiveness will be reported electronically to Ohio eTPES.