Firm’s History Sample Clauses

Firm’s History. The Legal practitioner and their standing in the barNumber of pupils • Number of paralegal staff • Number of support staff • Areas of practice & specialization • Whether the legal practitioners are members of professional bodies
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Firm’s History. The Legal practitioner and their standing in the bar Number of pupils Number of paralegal staff Number of support staff Areas of practice & specialization Whether the legal practitioners are members of professional bodies Facilities The firm should possess facilities like a modern legal library, access to online law reports or other legal resources, computers, internet connectivity etc to enable them provide adequate services and facilitate real –time communication. Payment of Fees / Cost The County Government of Turkana consider Law firms that offer the right balance of value for money as measured by the quality of legal services offered. The payment of fees will be based on the Advocates Remuneration Order, capped or as may be negotiated between the Law Firms and the County Government of Turkana and or as applicable to the case or matter being handled. Without prejudice to the contents of paragraph 8 the County Government of Turkana recognizes that the present 5th Schedule of the Advocates Remuneration Order (Schedule V) under the Advocates Act, 2014, provides for an hourly billing system or an amount fixed by agreement between the County Government of Turkana and the Firm. Law firms are required to fill in the table below (Hourly billing table). If and when the issue of hourly billing arises from the performance of services instructed within the two-year period, where County Government of Turkana Consents, the parties will refer to the table 10.1 below as a basis for discussion and determination of fees payable. PRICE SCHEDULE OF SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE ADVOCATES REMUNERATION ORDER, 2014 AS AMENDED Bidder’s signature………………………………………..Official Stamp………………………………… Date…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Firm’s History. Indicate whether there has been, within the preceding five years, any occurrence of the situations described below and, if yes, then describe in detail the circumstances surrounding each such situation and the outcome. Failure by a Firm to disclose any such situations may result in a determination that the Firm is ineligible to bid on, contract for, or perform any work in connection with any future Group projects. Each Firm must disclose each of the following: • Debarment (of either the Firm or any of its principal officers or owners) by any Federal, State, County, Municipal or other local agency • Involvement as a party in any litigation, arbitration or mediation associated with an energy project (not including any action filed to validate a transaction) • Any convictions of the Firm or any of its principal officers or owners for violation of any Federal or State antitrust law (e.g., bid rigging, collusion, conspiracy or otherwise restricting competition between bidders) or other law relating to bidding or performance of public works • Determination by a governmental or public authority, which became final or unappealable, that the Firm or any of its principal officers or owners: (i) knowingly concealed any deficiency in the performance of any contract or project; (ii) falsified any information or made deceptive or fraudulent statements in connection with any contract or project; or (iii) willfully disregarded applicable laws, regulations, rules or contractual requirements in connection with any contract or project • The Firm has filed any claims and/or lawsuits against any public agencies in connection with any contracts or projects of such public agencies and, if yes, identify the public agency and describe the nature and the outcome of such claim and lawsuit. Failure by a Firm to disclose any such claims and/or litigation may result in a determination that the Firm is ineligible to bid on, contract for, or perform any work in connection with the Group’s projects.

Related to Firm’s History

  • Investment Analysis and Commentary The Subadviser will provide quarterly performance analysis and market commentary (the “Investment Report”) during the term of this Agreement. The Investment Reports are due within 10 days after the end of each quarter. In addition, interim Investment Reports shall be issued at such times as may be mutually agreed upon by the Adviser and Subadviser; provided however, that any such interim Investment Report will be due within 10 days of the end of the month in which such agreement is reached between the Adviser and Subadviser. The subject of each Investment Report shall be mutually agreed upon. The Adviser is freely able to publicly distribute the Investment Report.

  • Medical Verification The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence if the Town perceives the employee is abusing sick leave or has used an excessive amount of sick leave. The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence to verify that the employee is able to return to work with or without restrictions.

  • Investment Analysis and Implementation In carrying out its obligations under Section 1 hereof, the Advisor shall: (a) supervise all aspects of the operations of the Funds; (b) obtain and evaluate pertinent information about significant developments and economic, statistical and financial data, domestic, foreign or otherwise, whether affecting the economy generally or the Funds, and whether concerning the individual issuers whose securities are included in the assets of the Funds or the activities in which such issuers engage, or with respect to securities which the Advisor considers desirable for inclusion in the Funds' assets; (c) determine which issuers and securities shall be represented in the Funds' investment portfolios and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; (d) formulate and implement continuing programs for the purchases and sales of the securities of such issuers and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; and (e) take, on behalf of the Trust and the Funds, all actions which appear to the Trust and the Funds necessary to carry into effect such purchase and sale programs and supervisory functions as aforesaid, including but not limited to the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of securities for the Funds.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING BOYCOTTING CERTAIN ENERGY COMPANIES (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree, when it is applicable, to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: If (a) company is not a sole proprietorship; (b) company has ten (10) or more full-time employees; and (c) this contract has a value of $100,000 or more that is to be paid wholly or partly from public funds, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ch. 2274 of SB 13 (87th session), the company hereby certifies and verifies that the company, or any wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary, parent company, or affiliate of these entities or business associations, if any, does not boycott energy companies and will not boycott energy companies during the term of the contract. For purposes of this contract, the term “company” shall mean an organization, association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company, that exists to make a profit. The term “boycott energy company” shall mean “without an ordinary business purpose, refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with a company because the company (a) engages in the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacturing of fossil fuel-based energy and does not commit or pledge to meet environmental standards beyond applicable federal and state law, or (b) does business with a company described by paragraph (a).” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 809.001(1).

  • Specialist A dentist who focuses on a specific area of dentistry, including oral surgery, endodontia, periodontia, orthodontia and pediatric dentistry, or a group of patients to diagnose, manage, prevent or treat certain types of symptoms and conditions. Spouse: The person to whom the Subscriber is legally married, including a same sex Spouse. Spouse also includes a domestic partner. Subscriber: The person to whom this Contract is issued. UCR (Usual, Customary and Reasonable): The cost of a dental service in a geographic area based on what Providers in the area usually charge for the same or similar medical service. Us, We, Our: BlueCross BlueShield of Western New York and anyone to whom We legally delegate performance, on Our behalf, under this Contract. Utilization Review: The review to determine whether services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational (including treatment for a rare disease or a clinical trial). You, Your: The Member.

  • Disturbance Analysis Data Exchange The Parties will cooperate with one another and the NYISO in the analysis of disturbances to either the Large Generating Facility or the New York State Transmission System by gathering and providing access to any information relating to any disturbance, including information from disturbance recording equipment, protective relay targets, breaker operations and sequence of events records, and any disturbance information required by Good Utility Practice.

  • ANALYSIS AND MONITORING The Custodian shall (a) provide the Fund (or its duly-authorized investment manager or investment adviser) with an analysis of the custody risks associated with maintaining assets with the Eligible Securities Depositories set forth on Schedule B hereto in accordance with section (a)(1)(i)(A) of Rule 17f-7, and (b) monitor such risks on a continuing basis, and promptly notify the Fund (or its duly-authorized investment manager or investment adviser) of any material change in such risks, in accordance with section (a)(1)(i)(B) of Rule 17f-7.

  • Specialists Persons working within a juridical person who possess uncommon knowledge essential to the commercial presence’s production, research equipment, techniques or management. In assessing such knowledge, account will be taken not only of knowledge specific to the commercial presence, but also of whether the person has a high level of qualification referring to a type of work or trade requiring specific technical knowledge, including membership of an accredited profession.

  • PROCEDURAL HISTORY On May 16, 2008, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T Illinois”) and Vertex Broadband, Corp. d/b/a AthenaTel d/b/a Reason to Switch d/b/a TownLink Communications d/b/a INT Connections (“Vertex”), filed a joint petition for approval of the 1st Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated May 6, 2008 under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. § 252 et seq.) (“the Act”). The 1st Amendment to the Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of AT&T Illinois and by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx on behalf of Vertex, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on June 9, 2008. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on June 6, 2008. At the hearing on June 9, 2008, AT&T Illinois, Vertex and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

  • PROCUREMENT ETHICS Contractor understands that a person who is interested in any way in the sale of any supplies, services, construction, or insurance to the State of Utah is violating the law if the person gives or offers to give any compensation, gratuity, contribution, loan, reward, or any promise thereof to any person acting as a procurement officer on behalf of the State of Utah, or who in any official capacity participates in the procurement of such supplies, services, construction, or insurance, whether it is given for their own use or for the use or benefit of any other person or organization.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!