For any Carrier Company Code Change. Carrier must submit a service order to AT&T-9STATE changing the OCN/ACNA for each circuit ID number, as applicable. Carrier shall pay the appropriate charges to AT&T-9STATE for each service order submitted to accomplish a CMRS Provider Company Code Change; such charges are contained in the applicable AT&T-9STATE tariffs. In addition, Carrier shall pay any and all charges to AT&T-9STATE required for re-stenciling, re-engineering, changing locks and any other work necessary with respect to Collocation, if Carrier has elected to collocate with AT&T-9STATE.
For any Carrier Company Code Change. Carrier must submit a service order to AT&T-9STATE changing the OCN/ACNA for each circuit ID number, as applicable. Carrier shall pay the appropriate charges to AT&T-9STATE for each service order submitted to accomplish a CMRS Provider Company Code Change; such charges are contained in the applicable AT&T-9STATE tariffs. In addition, Carrier shall pay any and all charges to AT&T-9STATE required for re- stenciling, re-engineering, changing locks and any other work necessary with respect to Collocation, if Xxxxxxx has elected a cost of doing business. The number of telecommunication providers that are or have been involved in a merger, consolidation, assignment or transfer of assets, or bankruptcy has been substantial and AT&T should not be expected to bear the cost of changing the requesting carrier’s records, performing re-stenciling, re- engineering, etc. Additionally, AT&T needs 90 days to research and verify that the Carrier involved with the request does not owe AT&T any outstanding charges, including collocation charges owed under this agreement. language “from its current standard … interconnection agreement [is] appropriate”? AT&T’s “standard” generic language is irrelevant. Where AT&T proposes changes to longstanding general provisions, it should bear the burden to justify any change based on proven necessity or Sprint’s consent. Absent such necessity or Sprint consent, changes premised simply on AT&T’s desires to require cookie- cutter terms and conditions
