Golden Litigation Sample Clauses

Golden Litigation. On May 1, 2001, Michael Golden ("Golden") filed an initial complaint against the Comxxxx xx xxx Xxrcuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida (the "Court"), alleging that the Company breached its January 5, 2001 employment agreement with Golden, which was entered into as a result of the merger between the Company and Colonial Direct Financial Group, Inc. ("Colonial Direct"). Mr. Golden claims that he terminated the agreement for "good reason," xx xxxxxed in the agreement, and that the Company has failed to pay him severance payments and other benefits as well as accrued commissions and un-reimbursed expenses. In the initial complaint, Golden sought monetary damages from the Company in excess of $50,000 together with interest, attorney's fees and costs. On July 13, 2001, the Company filed its answer and affirmative defenses and counterclaims with the Court against Golden and Ben Lichtenberg ("Lichtenberg"), Golden's partner in Colonial Direct, xxxxxxx xxx xatexxxx xxxxxxtions in the complaint, affirmatively alleging that Golden is not entitled to any severance payments because he was terminated for cause for his insubordination, failure to follow directives of the board of directors of the Company and for breaches of fiduciary duty to the Company. The Company also alleged that both Golden and Lichtenberg violated the merger agreement between Colonial Direct anx xxx Xxxxxny by breaching certain of the representations and warranties set forth in the merger agreement by, among other things, failing to advise the Company of certain loan agreement defaults, improperly withdrawing approximately $400,000 of capital from Colonial Direct, failing to deliver a closing balance sheet and failing to disclose significant liabilities of Colonial Direct. Claiming that the activities of Golden and Lichtenberg constituted violations of Florida's Securities Investor Xxxxxxxxxx Act, common law fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, intentional interference with advantageous business relationships, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and dealing, the Company is seeking indemnification under the merger agreement and additional monetary damages against Golden and Lichtenberg in excess of $15,000. In response to the Compaxx'x xxxxxx, affirmative defenses and counterclaims, on or about September 1, 2001, Golden filed an amended complaint with the Court against the Company, Leonard Sokolow ("Sokolow"), the President and C...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Golden Litigation

  • Transaction Litigation In the event that any stockholder litigation related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement is brought, or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened, against the Company or any Indemnified Party from and following the date of this Agreement and prior to the Effective Time (such litigation, other than any Proceeding in connection with, arising out of or otherwise related to a demand for appraisal under Section 262 of the DGCL, which shall be governed by Section 4.2(g), “Transaction Litigation”), the Company shall as promptly as practicable (a) notify Parent thereof and shall keep Parent reasonably informed with respect to the status thereof, (b) give Parent an opportunity to participate in the defense and/or settlement (at Parent’s sole expense and subject to a customary joint defense agreement) of any Transaction Litigation, (c) timely consult with Parent with respect to the defense and/or settlement of any Transaction Litigation and (d) shall consider in good faith Parent’s advice and recommendations with respect to such Transaction Litigation. The Company shall not agree to settle or offer to settle any Transaction Litigation without the prior written consent of Parent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed, or conditioned).

  • Shareholder Litigation The Company shall give Parent the opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any shareholder litigation against the Company and/or its directors relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and no such settlement shall be agreed to without Parent’s prior written consent.

  • Stockholder Litigation The Company shall give Parent the opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any stockholder litigation against the Company and/or its directors relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and no such settlement shall be agreed to without Parent’s prior written consent.

  • Certain Litigation The Company agrees that it shall not settle any litigation commenced after the date hereof against the Company or any of its directors by any shareholder of the Company relating to the Offer, the Merger, this Agreement, or the Shareholder Agreement, without the prior written consent of Parent. In addition, except as provided in Section 6.2(c), the Company shall not voluntarily cooperate with any third party that may hereafter seek to restrain or prohibit or otherwise oppose the Offer or the Merger and shall cooperate with Parent and Sub to resist any such effort to restrain or prohibit or otherwise oppose the Offer or the Merger.

  • Third Party Litigation The undersigned agrees to be available to the Company and its affiliates on a reasonable basis in connection with any pending or threatened claims, charges or litigation in which the Company or any of its affiliates is now or may become involved, or any other claims or demands made against or upon the Company or any of its affiliates, regardless of whether or not the undersigned is a named defendant in any particular case.

  • INDEMNIFICATION, LITIGATION The Company will indemnify the Executive to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the state of incorporation in effect at that time, or certificate of incorporation and by-laws of the Company whichever affords the greater protection to the Executive. The Executive will be entitled to any insurance proceeds related to any award, or any fees or expenses incurred in connection with any action, suit or proceeding to which he may be made a party by reason of being a director or officer of the Company.

  • Cooperation in Litigation Each party hereto will reasonably cooperate with the other in the defense or prosecution of any litigation or proceeding already instituted or which may be instituted hereafter against or by such party relating to or arising out of the use of the Purchased Assets prior to the Effective Date (other than litigation arising out of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement). The party requesting such cooperation shall pay the out-of-pocket expenses (including legal fees and disbursements) of the party providing such cooperation and of its officers, directors, employees, other personnel and agents reasonably incurred in connection with providing such cooperation, but shall not be responsible to reimburse the party providing such cooperation for such party's time spent in such cooperation or the salaries or costs of fringe benefits or similar expenses paid by the party providing such cooperation to its officers, directors, employees, other personnel and agents while assisting in the defense or prosecution of any such litigation or proceeding.

  • Related Litigation The party that delivers the Arbitration Notice to the other party shall have the option to also commence concurrent legal proceedings with any state or federal court sitting in Salt Lake County, Utah (“Litigation Proceedings”), subject to the following: (a) the complaint in the Litigation Proceedings is to be substantially similar to the claims set forth in the Arbitration Notice, provided that an additional cause of action to compel arbitration will also be included therein, (b) so long as the other party files an answer to the complaint in the Litigation Proceedings and an answer to the Arbitration Notice, the Litigation Proceedings will be stayed pending an Arbitration Award (or Appeal Panel Award (defined below), as applicable) hereunder, (c) if the other party fails to file an answer in the Litigation Proceedings or an answer in the Arbitration proceedings, then the party initiating Arbitration shall be entitled to a default judgment consistent with the relief requested, to be entered in the Litigation Proceedings, and (d) any legal or procedural issue arising under the Arbitration Act that requires a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction may be determined in the Litigation Proceedings. Any award of the arbitrator (or of the Appeal Panel (defined below)) may be entered in such Litigation Proceedings pursuant to the Arbitration Act.

  • Pending Litigation There are no actions, suits, proceedings or written agreements pending, or, to the Company’s knowledge, threatened or proposed, against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries at law or in equity or before or by any federal, state, municipal, or other governmental department, commission, board, or other administrative agency, domestic or foreign, that, either separately or in the aggregate, would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company and any of its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or affect issuance or payment of the Subordinated Notes; and neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or named as subject to the provisions of any order, writ, injunction, or decree of, or any written agreement with, any court, commission, board or agency, domestic or foreign, that either separately or in the aggregate, will have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company and any of its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.

  • Litigation There is no action, suit, inquiry, notice of violation, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened against or affecting the Company, any Subsidiary or any of their respective properties before or by any court, arbitrator, governmental or administrative agency or regulatory authority (federal, state, county, local or foreign) (collectively, an “Action”) which (i) adversely affects or challenges the legality, validity or enforceability of any of the Transaction Documents or the Securities or (ii) could, if there were an unfavorable decision, have or reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary, nor any director or officer thereof, is or has been the subject of any Action involving a claim of violation of or liability under federal or state securities laws or a claim of breach of fiduciary duty. There has not been, and to the knowledge of the Company, there is not pending or contemplated, any investigation by the Commission involving the Company or any current or former director or officer of the Company. The Commission has not issued any stop order or other order suspending the effectiveness of any registration statement filed by the Company or any Subsidiary under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.